帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

南海《更路簿》非物质文化遗产集体记忆的失忆与重构
The memory loss and reconstruction of intangible cultural heritage of South China Sea's "Geng Lu Bu" collective memory

查看参考文献38篇

文摘 南海《更路簿》是国家级非遗,承载着千百年来中国海南渔民耕海作业的集体记忆与“祖宗海”的家国情怀,探讨《更路簿》的保护、传承和活化等问题意义重大。通过对海南琼海、文昌等地20名老渔民的实地调研,采用NVivo 8软件对访谈及文献资料进行分析,探讨《更路簿》集体记忆的动态变化及其重构机制。研究表明:①记忆主体的更迭和客体信息的功能演变弱化了《更路簿》记忆的生境,渔民对时间性、季节性感知的失律,滞塞了记忆的代际流动。②《更路簿》集体记忆重构体现在多元主体的诉求赋予《更路簿》新的价值和意义,文本传承的仪式感与神圣空间的制度化激活了集体记忆的生命力,媒体语境对信息的重组和群体身份的同化构成记忆重构的重要路径。③渔民对南海的地方认同和情感依恋凝缩为记忆重构的特质内核,地理空间的地方化建构起个体记忆一集体记忆双向沟通的渠道,记忆的外生性升华为家一国尺度的转化。④南海作为渔民流动轨迹覆盖的场域,其活动空间的盈缩与《更路簿》记忆相关依赖,相互影响,渔民的空间实践与身份认同构成人一海间纽带联结的重要因素。
其他语种文摘 The "Geng Lu Bu" of South China Sea is a national non-material cultural heritage, which carries Hainan fishermen's deep "Family-country" feelings and collective memory about the activities of “Cultivating the Sea” for thousands of years. With the rapid development of navigation technologies and positioning systems in a modern society, "Geng Lu Bu" is gradually fading out of the stage of history. Hainan fishermen's collective memory of "Geng Lu Bu" has been suffering from amnesia, so it is of great significance to discuss how to activate "Geng Lu Bu" as a cultural heritage, and is of great urgency to explore how to not only protect but also inherit the collective memory effectively. Data and information are obtained from field surveys in Wenchang and Qionghai of Hainan and interviews from 20 local old fishermen. By adopting software NVivo8 to analyze the interview data and some relevant literatures, this paper discussed the dynamic change and reconstruction mechanism of collective memory. Results show that: (1) The intergenerational change of memory subject and the functional evolution of memory objective information has weakened the survival environment of "Geng Lu Bu". The fishermen's vague perception of fishing time and season obstructs the intergenerational inheritance of the memory about "Geng Lu Bu". (2) Multiple memory subjects' persue attaches new value and meaning to "Geng Lu Bu", and this, from another perspective, can reflect the reconstruction of collective memory of "Geng Lu Bu". Besides, the tradition of family inheritance and the systematization of scared space have activated the vital force of this memory. Conducted by the media, information's reorganization and identity assimilation has become an important way to reconstruct the memory. (3) Fishermen's local identity and emotional connection to the South China Sea, is the core of the memory's reconstruction. The localization of geographical space has formed a mutual communication between collective memory and individual memory. The exogenous character of collective memory has been sublimated into the "family-country isomorphism". (4) As the birthplace of "Cultivating the Sea" culture, the South China Sea's spatial pattern change has depended on the memory about "Geng Lu Bu" and interacted with each other. In the future, the linkage of the memory about "Geng Lu Bu" and the memory subject would be significantly affected by the fishermen's spatial practice and identity. The paper finally puts forward some suggestions on the protection and activation of cultural heritage.
来源 地理学报 ,2017,72(12):2281-2294 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201712012
关键词 集体记忆 ; 更路簿 ; 记忆重构 ; 耕海文化
地址

华南师范大学地理科学学院, 广州, 510631

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
基金 国家自然科学基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6137104

参考文献 共 38 共2页

1.  Assmann J. Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique,1995,65:125-133 被引 4    
2.  Withers C W J. Landscape, memory, history: Gloomy memories and the 19th century Scottish Highlands. Scottish Geographical Journal,2005,121(1):29-44 被引 8    
3.  Atkinson D. Urban rhetoric and embodied identities: City, nation, and empire at the Vittorio Emanuele II monument in Rome, 1870-1945. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1998,88(1):28-49 被引 1    
4.  Terdiman R. Given memory: On mnemonic coercion, reproduction and invention,2003:187 被引 1    
5.  Cook M. Agents of memorialization: Gunter Demnig's Stolpersteine and the individual (re-)creation of a Holocaust landscape in Berlin. Journal of Historical Geography,2014,43:138-147 被引 1    
6.  Hoelscher S. Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship. Social & Cultural Geography,2004,5(3):347-355 被引 12    
7.  周玮. 近20年城市记忆研究综述. 城市问题,2015(3):2-10 被引 7    
8.  朱蓉. 城市记忆与城市形态:从心理学、社会学视角探讨城市历史文化延续,2005 被引 1    
9.  李凡. 从地理学视角看城市历史文化景观集体记忆的研究. 人文地理,2010,25(4):60-66 被引 17    
10.  Yerushalmi Y H. Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory,2011:21-33 被引 1    
11.  李凡. 快速城市化背景下佛山传统祠堂文化景观变化以及地方认同的建构. 人文地理,2013,28(6):9-16 被引 12    
12.  汪芳. 迁移中的记忆与乡愁:城乡记忆的演变机制和空间逻辑. 地理研究,2017,36(1):3-25 被引 30    
13.  Seaton A V. The marketing of tourism products: Concepts, issues and case. Cengage Learning EMEA,1996:63-66 被引 1    
14.  Zhen F. The Rise of the internet city in China: Production and consumption of internet information. Urban Studies,2015,52(13):2313-2329 被引 13    
15.  杜芳娟. 贵州仡佬族精英的民族身份认同及其建构. 地理研究,2010,29(11):2089-2098 被引 7    
16.  汪芳. 传统村落的集体记忆研究--对纪录片《记住乡愁》进行内容分析为例. 地理研究,2015,34(12):2368-2380 被引 25    
17.  汪芳. 城市记忆规划研究:以北京市宣武区为例. 国际城市规划,2010(1):71-76 被引 4    
18.  汪芳. 基于游客认知的历史地段城市记忆研究——以北京南锣鼓巷历史地段为例. 地理学报,2012,67(4):545-556 被引 17    
19.  钱丽芸. 地方性与传承:宜兴紫砂文化的地理品牌与变迁. 地理科学,2011,31(10):1166-1171 被引 6    
20.  孙九霞. 遗产旅游地居民的地方认同--“碉乡”符号、记忆与空间. 地理研究,2015,34(12):2381-2394 被引 33    
引证文献 4

1 吕龙 乡村文化记忆资源的“文—旅”协同评价模型与应用——以苏州金庭镇为例 自然资源学报,2020,35(7):1570-1585
被引 7

2 曾娟 近30年来中国遗产研究的地理学科贡献 热带地理,2022,42(1):1-15
被引 0 次

显示所有4篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号