公务员工作投入与心理幸福感的关系:有中介的调节模型
Work Engagement and Psychological Well-being in Civil Servants: A Mediated Moderation Model
查看参考文献32篇
文摘
|
目的:探讨我国公务员工作投入与心理幸福感的关系,仁慈、德行、威权三类家长式领导风格在其中的调节作用及心理韧性对该调节的中介效应。方法:使用中文版Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)、家长式领导量表、Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表(CD-RISC)中文版和Ryff心理幸福感量表中文修订版,对411名公务员施测。结果:控制相关协变量后:①工作投入能显著正向预测公务员心理幸福感(γ=0.28,P <0.001);②德行领导对工作投入与心理幸福感的关系具正向调节作用(γ=0.08,P =0.029),且通过心理韧性的完全中介实现;威权领导具负向调节作用(γ=-0.17,P <0.001),通过心理韧性的部分中介实现;仁慈领导调节作用不显著。结论:我国公务员工作投入和心理幸福感的关系受德行和威权领导影响,在高德行领导或低威权领导下的公务员更能通过工作投入促进心理幸福感,该影响需通过公务员心理韧性发挥作用。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: The current study was conducted to the moderating effects of three different paternalistic leadership styles in the relationship between the work engagement and the psychological well-being in Chinese civil servants,and whether moderating effects were mediated by resilience.Methods: 411 Chinese civil servants were investigated with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale(UWES),Paternalistic Leadership Style Scale,Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CDRISC)and Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scale.Results: After controlling for several demographic variables,①the work engagement significantly and positively predicted the psychological well-being(γ=0.28,P <0.001);②The moral leadership positively moderated the relationship between the work engagement and the psychological well-being(γ=0.08,P = 0.029),and the resilience mediate the moderation completely.The authoritarian leadership had a negative moderation(γ=-0.17,P <0.001)which was partially mediated by the resilience.However,the moderation of the benevolent leadership was not significant.Conclusion: For Chinese civil servants,the relationship between the engagement and the psychological well-being is moderated by the moral or authoritarian leadership.The positive effect of work engagement on psychological well-being,which is mediated by resilience,will be stronger for those civil servants whose leaders possess high-level moral leadership or low-level authoritarian leadership. |
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2017,25(6):1109-1113 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.06.025
|
关键词
|
工作投入
;
家长式领导
;
心理韧性
;
心理幸福感
;
公务员
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
学科
|
基础医学 |
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6135306
|
参考文献 共
32
共2页
|
1.
马爽. 地税基层公务员工作压力与工作满意度、离职意向的关系:心理资本的调节作用.
中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(2):326-329,335
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
2.
张建人. 社区工作人员工作价值观、工作满意度与工作绩效的关系.
中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(1):178-181
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
3.
张陆. 自我实现的幸福——心理幸福感研究述评.
心理科学进展,2007,15(1):134-139
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
4.
胡少楠. 工作投入的概念、测量、前因与后效.
心理科学进展,2014,12:1975-1984
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Robertson I T. Job and work attitudes, engagement and employee performance: Where does psychological well-being fit in?.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal,2012,33(3):224-232
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Matz-Costa C. Differential impact of multiple levels of productive activity engagement on psychological well-being in middle and later life.
The Gerontologist,2014,54(2):277-289
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Chen C Y. The Influence of Leader's Spiritual Values of Servant Leadership on Employee Motivational Autonomy and Eudaemonic Well-Being.
Journal of Religion & Health,2013,52(2):418-438
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Chughtai A. Linking Ethical Leadership to Employee Well-Being: The Role of Trust in Supervisor.
Journal of Business Ethics,2015,128(3):653-663
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
9.
郑伯埙. 家长式领导:三元模式的建构与测量.
本土心理学研究,2000,14:3-64
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
10.
郑伯埙. 华人组织的家长式领导\一项文化观点的分析.
本土心理学研究,2001,13:127-180
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Skakon J. Are leaders'well-being behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of employees? A systematic review of three decades of research.
Work & Stress,2010,24(2):107-139
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Bronfenbrenner U.
Ecological systems theory,1992
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Mastern A S. Ordinary magic: Resilience process in development.
American Psychologist,2001,56(3):227-238
|
被引
46
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,1987,57(3):316-331
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
15.
刘玉兰. 西方抗逆力理论:转型,演进,争辩和发展.
国外社会科学,2011,6:68
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Luthar S S. The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work.
Child Development,2000,71(3):543-562
|
被引
73
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Doll B. Risk and Resilience: Implications for the Delivery of Educational and Mental Health Services in Schools.
School Psychology Review,1998,27(3):348-363
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Polk L V. Toward a middle-range theory of resilience.
Ans Advances in Nursing Science,1997,19(3):1-13
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Rutter M. Resilience: Some conceptual considerations.
Journal of Adolescent Health,1993,14(8):626-631
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
20.
洪炜. 心理弹性对基层公务员焦虑和抑郁的影响-有调节的中介模型.
中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(5):795-798
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|