帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

循证构建动物实验系统评价制作流程
Systematic development of a standard process for systematic reviews of animal experimental studies

查看参考文献28篇

许家科 1   赵璐璐 1   廖绪亮 1   王欢 1   闫琼 1   武凯楠 1   谢晔 1   赵梦娜 1   魏晨如 1   侯皓中 1   肖政 2   赵霏 3   陈红梅 4   刘雅莉 5   姜彦彪 1   马彬 5 *  
文摘 目前,动物实验系统评价已成为整合动物实验结果、改善动物实验质量和指导临床研究的新趋势和重要手段。但已发表的动物实验系统评价在设计和实施过程均存在较多问题。因此,急需一个设计科学、实施规范的系统评价标准流程以提高动物实验系统评价的质量。本文将详细介绍动物实验系统评价制作流程,以推动国内高质量动物实验系统评价的开展。
其他语种文摘 At present,systematic reviews of animal experimental studies has become a new trend and an important way to synthesize the results of animal experimental studies,improve the conducting and reporting quality of animal experimental studies and provide references for the furture clinical research.However,there are many problems in the design and implementation process of published systematic reviews of animal experimental studies.Therefore,it is important to design a scientific and standard practical process to improve the quality of systematic reviews of animal experimental studies.In this paper,we developed a standard process for systematic reviews of animal experimental studies,in order to improve the quality of systematic reviews of animal experimental studies.
来源 中国循证医学杂志 ,2017,17(11):1357-1364 【核心库】
DOI 10.7507/1672-2531.201707133
关键词 系统评价 ; Meta分析 ; 动物实验
地址

1. 兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 兰州, 730000  

2. 遵义医学院附属医院遵义医学院循证医学中心,循证医学教育部网上合作研究中心遵义医学院分中心, 贵州, 遵义, 563000  

3. 西北民族大学医学院, 兰州, 730030  

4. 兰州大学基础医学院医学生理学与心理学研究所, 兰州, 730000  

5. 兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室, 兰州, 730000

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1672-2531
学科 医药、卫生
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6121208

参考文献 共 28 共2页

1.  杨克虎. 系统评价指导手册,2010:1-342 被引 1    
2.  Perel P. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ,2007,334(7586):197 被引 11    
3.  Roberts I. Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitation. BMJ,2002,324(7335):474-476 被引 15    
4.  Pound P. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?. BMJ,2004,328(7438):514-517 被引 15    
5.  Ritskes-Hoitinga M. Systematic reviews of preclinical animal studies can make significant contributions to health care and more transparent translational medicine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014(3):ED000078 被引 4    
6.  Mignini L E. Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research. BMC Med Res Methodol,2006,6:10 被引 7    
7.  Hooijmans C R. Meta-analyses of animal studies: an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare. ILAR J,2014,55(3):418-426 被引 4    
8.  Vesterinen H M. Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide. J Neurosci Methods,2014,221(15):92-102 被引 6    
9.  De Vries R B. A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies. Evid Based Preclin Med,2015,2(1):1-9 被引 1    
10.  De Vries R B. A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase. Lab Anim,2011,45(4):268-270 被引 2    
11.  Hooijmans C R. Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed. Lab Anim,2010,44(3):170-175 被引 6    
12.  Leenaars M. A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies. Lab Anim,2012,46(1):24 被引 5    
13.  Hooijmans C R. SYRCLE's risk ofbias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol,2014,14:43 被引 37    
14.  Peters J L. A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting. J Environ Sci Health B,2006,41(7):1245 被引 11    
15.  Mapstone J. Fluid resuscitation strategies: A systematic review of animal trials. J Trauma,2003,55(3):571-589 被引 8    
16.  Kilkenny C. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One,2009,4(11):e7824 被引 17    
17.  Hb V D W. Hypothermia in animal models of acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Brain,2007,130(Pt 12):3063-3074 被引 8    
18.  陈匡阳. 动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索策略报告情况调查. 中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(3):348-353 被引 5    
19.  Higgins J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: version 5.1.0,2011 被引 1    
20.  Hooijmans C R. The effects of long-term omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cognition and Alzheimer's pathology in animal models of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis,2012,28(1):191-209 被引 8    
引证文献 4

1 赵霏 动物实验系统评价/Meta分析的质量和报告特征 中国循证医学杂志,2018,18(8):871-877
被引 4

2 徐鹏 中药对自身免疫性重症肌无力动物干预作用实验研究的系统评价 中医杂志,2018,59(16):1420-1425
被引 0 次

显示所有4篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号