跨境流动视阈下的节庆文化与民族认同研究——中越边境苗族花山节案例
Examining festival culture and ethnic identity from the perspective of cross-border mobility: A case study of Huashan Festival at the Sino-Vietnamese borderland
查看参考文献35篇
|
文摘
|
边界是分割不同政治实体的界线,但国家对于边界的管治往往是有弹性的,因而孕育了丰富的“流动”,成为经济融合、社会交流与文化对话的重要场域。跨境民族是受其影响的典型群体,他们在原本生活区域被分隔的情况下,从未间断过跨境流动。总体来看,跨境流动过程中的文化认同及其形成机制是多元复杂的。本文以云南省河口县中越边境地区的苗族花山节为研究切入点,通过质性研究方法探讨节庆所折射的民族文化认同与国家认同的建构过程。研究发现:跨界的流动性加强了民族文化的交流与认同,共同促成了花山节的文化传承,维系了跨境民族的亲缘关系。这样的跨界流动亦强化了边界所形成的发展轨迹差异的感知,从而增强了中国籍苗族边民的国家认同与国家自豪感。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Border is a political institution that not only separates political entities as nation-states with territorially based sovereignty, but also creates potentials for encounter, contact, and exchange. This point of view is particularly relevant to ethnic groups that lead cross-border living, whose lifeworlds are crosscut by de jure borders that impose belonging to nation-states and territorially based citizenship. Yet, the control of borders exercised by sovereign states is never complete or absolute. In contrast, cross-border ethnic groups are usually able to devise myriad tactics and strategies to facilitate border crossing. To interpret the geopolitical implications of such border crossing practices is thus an important academic enterprise for scholars interested in analyzing borderscapes from mundane and bottom-up perspectives. So far, the extant scholarship has pointed to two major lines of arguments that concern the relationship between border crossing and ethnic identity/sense of national belonging. On the one hand, bottom-up and spontaneous mobilities that transcend the confinement of borders are often read as resistance, or at least transgression, to the geopolitical order defined by legal borders. On the other hand, however, it has been warned that an exclusive emphasis on resistance and transgression runs the risk of idealizing cross-border mobilities, while the latter may re-inscribe and consolidate, rather than destabilize identification to nation-states, especially when the radical differences in social, economic, and political niches give rise to heightened perceptions of partition and thus "non-belonging" to a presumed ethnic identity. In this vein, this article proposes the hypothesis that the possibility of cross-border mobility re-inscribing borders and consolidating sense of belonging to nation-state cannot be ruled out. This article uses a case study of crossborder attendance of Huashan Festival at the Sino-Vietnamese borderland. Overall, the empirical findings suggest that the maintenance of cross-border ethnic ties and identity and the assertion of national belonging to China are two processes that are largely co-existence, even mutually reinforcing. The ways in which Huashan celebrations are organized at the two sides of the border are now radically different. While Huashan in Vietnam adheres more loyally to traditional practices, norms, and taboos, the one at the Chinese side has incorporated staged performances to boost local tourism and refashioned ethnic cultural activities to make them in tune with standards and tastes of "modern",“urban”popular cultures. Consequently, Chinese Miao tend to consolidate a sense of belonging to China due to a sense of being“modernized”and culturally superior. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2017,36(9):1081-1091 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.09.004
|
|
关键词
|
边界
;
跨境民族
;
节庆
;
国家认同
;
民族认同
|
|
地址
|
1.
西南林业大学园林学院, 昆明, 650224
2.
香港大学地理学系, 香港, 999077
3.
华南师范大学地理科学学院,文化地理与文化产业研究中心, 广州, 510631
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
云南省高校重点建设学科风景园林学建设项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6081268
|
参考文献 共
35
共2页
|
|
1.
谷家荣.
边民生活政治:滇越跨境民族的记忆、心境与行动,2013
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
何跃. 边民主义与跨界民族主义:以中国西南边疆为研究对象.
云南民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2010,27(1):24-29
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
马翀炜. 跨境橡胶种植对民族认同和国家认同的影响:以中老边境两个哈尼族(阿卡人)村寨为例.
思想战线,2011,37(3):17-21
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
齐鹏飞. 中越陆地边界谈判的历史及其基本经验再认识.
当代中国史研究,2013,20(3):60-68
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
石茂明.
跨国苗族研究:民族与国家的边界,2004:165-166
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
唐雪琼. 社会建构主义视角下的边界——研究综述与启示.
地理科学进展,2014,33(7):969-978
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
郑宇.
仪式类型与社会边界:越南老街省孟康县坡龙乡坡龙街赫蒙族调查研究,2013:220
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Alvarez R R Jr. The Mexican-US border: The making of an anthropology of borderlands.
Annual Review of Anthropology,1995,24(1):447-470
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Anderson B.
Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism,1983
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Anderson M.
Frontiers: Territory and state formation in the modern world,1996
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Anzaldua G.
Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. 3rd ed,2007
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Balibar E.
Politics and the other scene,2002
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Berndt C. Performative regional (dis)integration: Transnational markets, mobile commodities, and bordered North-South differences.
Environment and Planning A,2011,43(5):1057-1078
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Bhabha H K.
The location of culture,1994
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Casey E S. Border versus boundary at La Frontera.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,2011,29(3):384-398
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Dell'Agnese E. "Welcome to Tijuana": Popular music on the US-Mexico border.
Geopolitics,2015,20(1):171-192
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Diana A. The experimental governing of mobility and trade on the China-Laos frontier: The Tai Lue case.
Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography,2013,34(1):25-39
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Doevenspeck M. Constructing the border from below: Narratives from the Congolese-Rwandan state boundary.
Political Geography,2011,30(3):129-142
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Ernste H. Trans-world: Debating the place and borders of places in the age of transnationalism.
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,2009,100(5):577-586
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Fondahl G. Working borders and shifting identities in the Russian Far North.
Geoforum,2003,34(4):541-556
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问