帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

近20年来康定市景观格局演变及其驱动力分析
On the landscape pattern evolution and its motivating factors in Kangding City in the past two decades

查看参考文献27篇

贾佳 1   白军红 1 *   邓伟 2   李爱农 2   孔博 2   温晓君 1   卢琼琼 1  
文摘 为了研究近20年来康定市景观格局的演变并分析其主要驱动力,基于1990、2000、2010年的遥感解译数据,在类型和景观水平上计算分析了近20年来康定市的景观格局指数变化、景观类型转移和质心偏移,探讨了康定市景观格局演变的主要驱动力。结果表明:1)康定市景观格局中林地景观和草地景观所占面积最大,为主要优势基质景观类型,对维持区域生态系统稳定起决定性作用,其次依次为其他景观、水域景观、农田景观和人文景观;2)20年来康定市景观破碎化程度有所增加,景观形状整体上趋于简单化,景观连接性和多样性增加,但景观均匀度下降;3)1990-2010年人文景观和林地景观面积增加,而农田景观面积降低,其他类型面积变化较小,农田景观和人文景观受人类干扰较大,破碎化程度增加,斑块形状趋于简单;4)1990-2000年景观类型面积基本未发生转移,2000-2010年农田景观和草地景观向林地景观转移,草地景观和林地景观向人文景观转移;5)近20年来人文景观类型向西偏移了0.058°,向北偏移了0.026°,农田景观类型向西偏移了0.033°,向南偏移了0.014°,而林地、草地、水域和其他景观类型的质心几乎未发生偏移。近20年来康定市景观格局变化是自然因素和人为因素综合作用的结果,特别是社会经济、政策和人口增长等人为因素是康定市景观格局演变的主要因素。
其他语种文摘 To describe and register the evolutionary landscape pattern change of Kangding City over the past decades and explore the motivating factors via the remote sensing images of the yeas of 1990, 2000 and 2010, the authors have made an investigation and exploration of the indicative factors of the landscape pattern in accordance with the classic landscape scale mode by using the Fragstats 4.0 software. In doing so, we have also analyzed the dynamic changes in the transformation of the spatial centers of all the landscape types in the past 20 years. The results of our investigation and identification can be shown in the following main points: (1) The landscape pattern of the City has been mainly dominated by the forest land and the grassland landscapes, which are followed by the other types of landscape, such as the water bodies, the crop fields and the livestock breeding culture; (2) The entire shape of the landscape at the regional scale turned to be more simplified and dramatically promoted to a higher level during the period under study. Thus, it can be said that the landscape indexes of uniformity and diversity has been increased with the feature of homogeneity being decreased. (3) The areas of the cultural and forestland landscape has been increased with the areas of the cropland being shrunk from 1990 to 2010, though the other types of the landscape areas have seldom been found changed. Due to human interference, the landscape of cropland and the home-breeding husbandry landscape turn to be simplified and promoted to a higher level. (4) Truly speaking, little change and transformation have been found noticeably from the urban areas to the coordinative centers of the mixed landscapes during the decade from 1990 to 2000, whereas obvious changes can be observed from the decade between 2000 to 2010. For example, lots of cropland and grassland turn to be converted into forestland landscape with the grassland and forestland transformed into culture landscape. (5) Statistically speaking, the cultural landscape moved to the west by 0.058 degree while the cropland landscape moved to the north for 0.026 degree and a 0.033 degree shift to the west and then 0.026 degree to the south. The results of the principal component analysis demonstrate that the evolutionary change of the landscape pattern has mainly driven by the natural and anthropogenic factors, especially by the social and economic factors, political factors in addition to the urban population expansion on the dynamic changes of the landscape pattern of the city.
来源 安全与环境学报 ,2017,17(4):1571-1577 【扩展库】
DOI 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2017.04.068
关键词 环境学 ; 景观格局指数 ; 景观格局动态 ; 转移矩阵 ; 质心转移 ; 驱动力
地址

1. 北京师范大学环境学院, 北京, 100875  

2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都, 610041

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1009-6094
学科 环境保护管理
文献收藏号 CSCD:6066271

参考文献 共 27 共2页

1.  苏洁琼. 气候变化对湿地景观格局的影响研究综述. 环境科学与技术,2012,35(4):74-81 被引 12    
2.  张楷若. 基于RS和GIS的广元朝天区土地利用景观格局分析,2013 被引 3    
3.  Turner M G. Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science?. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematic,2005,36(7):319-344 被引 46    
4.  Bogaert J. Book review multifunctional landscapes. Landscape Ecology,2006,21(3):465-467 被引 2    
5.  胡金明. 纳帕海湿地季节性景观格局动态变化及其驱动. 地理研究,2010,29(5):899-908 被引 13    
6.  杨丽. 泾河流域景观指数的粒度效应分析. 资源科学,2007,29(2):183-187 被引 31    
7.  胡巍巍. 景观格局与生态过程相互关系研究进展. 地理科学进展,2008,27(1):18-24 被引 45    
8.  Musacchio L. Changing landscapes, changing disciplines: seeking to understand inter disciplinarity in landscape ecological change research. Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,73(4):326-338 被引 6    
9.  白军红. 白洋淀湖沼湿地系统景观格局演变及驱动力分析. 地理研究,2013,32(9):1634-1644 被引 22    
10.  Li Shengnan. Influence of hydrology process on wetland landscape pattern: a case study in the Yellow River Delta. Ecological Engineering,2009,35(12):1719-1726 被引 19    
11.  周亚东. 基于GIS与Fragstats的海南岛森林景观格局研究. 中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(5):78-83 被引 16    
12.  国务院办公厅. 国务院关于印发全国主体功能区规划的通知,2011 被引 3    
13.  黄来斌. Changes of wetlands landscapes in the Yalong River catchment. 长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(S1):140-147 被引 5    
14.  Lausch A. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecological Indicators,2002,2(1/2):3-15 被引 34    
15.  Bai Junhong. Changes in landscape pattern of alpine wetlands on the Zoige Plateau in the past four decades. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(5):2245-2252 被引 8    
16.  刘艳芬. 1995--1999年黄河三角洲东部自然保护区湿地景观格局变化. 应用生态学报,2010,21(11):2904-2911 被引 23    
17.  Wand F. Quantitative methods and application in GIS,2006 被引 1    
18.  姜欢欢. 三峡库区秭归县景观格局变化及模拟预测. 应用生态学报,2009,20(2):474-479 被引 11    
19.  吴菊. 鄱阳湖区土地利用景观格局变化与驱动力研究,2008 被引 1    
20.  郭泺. 黔东南地区景观格局的动态变化及驱动力. 山地学报,2011,29(5):543-550 被引 11    
引证文献 2

1 魏雪馨 浙江庆元香菇文化系统景观特征及演变 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(9):1443-1452
被引 1

2 付士磊 基于生态敏感性分析评价的生态安全管控研究---以沈抚新区为例 安全与环境学报,2020,20(4):1579-1587
被引 5

显示所有2篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号