帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

解释水平视角下的道德判断
Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective

查看参考文献46篇

文摘 道德判断对社会合作有重要意义。近20年来涌现出大量对道德判断的研究。经典的社会直觉模型和双加工模型已经不足以解释所有的研究发现。近年来,解释水平理论为道德判断的研究提供了一个新的视角。通过文献梳理发现,基于解释水平理论的道德判断研究可以分为两难的道德判断研究和一般的道德判断研究。两难的道德判断研究已经有了较为一致的结论,但是一般的道德判断研究还存在争议。解释水平影响道德判断的深层原因可能是通过关注点影响道德判断的标准。未来的研究可以着眼于跨文化研究和深层机制的剖析,为解释水平视角下的道德判断研究提供更多的实验证据,加深人们对道德判断的理解。
其他语种文摘 Moral judgment is critical for social cooperation. Research on moral judgment has been rapidly growing in the last 20 years. Empirical evidence has been accumulating to challenge the assumptions underlying the Social Intuitionist Model and Dual-process Model, which are the dominant models of moral judgment. Recently, construal level theory (CLT) has provided a new perspective for research on moral judgment. This article reviewed CLT-based research on moral judgment by classifying studies into two different categories, namely, moral judgment on moral dilemmas and moral judgment on moral and immoral actions. Evidence from the former arrived at a consistent conclusion, whereas that from the latter is inconclusive. We proposed that construal levels may affect moral judgment through turning people's attention to different principles. Future research should focus on cross-cultural comparisons and exploring the mechanism underlying the relationship between CLT and moral judgment to clarify the controversy and provide additional empirical evidence.
来源 心理科学进展 ,2017,25(8):1423-1430 【核心库】
DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01423
关键词 道德判断 ; 解释水平理论 ; 道德两难 ; 道德违规行为 ; 道德高尚行为
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-3710
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目 ;  中国科学院青年创新促进会项目 ;  中国科协青年人才托举工程
文献收藏号 CSCD:6047976

参考文献 共 46 共3页

1.  宋希仁. 伦理学大辞典,1989 被引 2 次    
2.  叶红燕. 从具身视角看道德判断. 心理科学进展,2015,23:1480-1488 被引 4 次    
3.  喻丰. 道德困境之困境——情与理的辩争. 心理科学进展,2011,19:1702-1712 被引 14 次    
4.  Agerstrom J. Temporal distance and moral concerns: Future morally questionable behavior is perceived as more wrong and evokes stronger prosocial intentions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,2009,31:49-59 被引 1 次    
5.  Agerstrom J. Why people with an eye toward the future are more moral: The role of abstract thinking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,2013,35:373-381 被引 4 次    
6.  Agerstrom J. Look at yourself! Visual perspective influences moral judgment by level of mental construal. Social Psychology,2013,44:42-46 被引 3 次    
7.  Aguilar P. Psychological distance increases uncompromising consequentialism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2013,49:449-452 被引 3 次    
8.  Amit E. Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2009,138:400-415 被引 10 次    
9.  Amit E. You see, the ends don't justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science,2012,23:861-868 被引 3 次    
10.  Bar-Anan Y. The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2006,135:609-622 被引 21 次    
11.  Bartels D M. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition,2008,108:381-417 被引 7 次    
12.  Cohen D J. A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2016,145:1359-1381 被引 1 次    
13.  Cui F. Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other's pain: An ERP study. Scientific Report,2016,6:20851 被引 5 次    
14.  Cushman F. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science,2006,17:1082-1089 被引 11 次    
15.  Everett J A C. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2016,145:772-787 被引 2 次    
16.  Eyal T. Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Herzliya series on personality and social psychology,2012:185-202 被引 1 次    
17.  Eyal T. Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2008,44:1204-1209 被引 8 次    
18.  Fiedler K. Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2007,17:101-106 被引 4 次    
19.  Gong H. Consequences are far away: Psychological distance affects modes of moral decision making. Cognition,2012 被引 1 次    
20.  Gong H. Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making,2012,7:628-638 被引 6 次    
引证文献 5 篇

1 陈庆伟 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 心理科学进展,2018,26(6):1083-1095
被引 3 次

2 李悦 信息特征对个体限制性政策抵触态度的影响:基于解释水平理论 中国临床心理学杂志,2020,28(2):404-408
被引 0 次

显示所有5篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号