西北干旱区乡村性评价及驱动机制研究——以甘肃武威为例
Research on Rurality Evaluation and the Driving Mechanism in Arid Regions of Northwest China: A Case Study ofWuwei City in Gansu Province
查看参考文献35篇
|
文摘
|
基于武威市1949~2013年65 a的社会经济统计数据,以县域为基本单元构建乡村性指标体系,通过测算各县区乡村性指数和分异指数来分析乡村性的时间演变和空间分异,并从社会经济和技术经济两个维度探讨了乡村性演变的影响因素。结果表明:① 1949~2013年间武威市各县区乡村性指数总体呈减弱趋势,但减弱幅度和速度存在差异。②各县区乡村性分异指数呈波动增长趋势,2000年以后乡村性分异指数急剧增长,表明各县区乡村性差异越来越大。③社会经济和技术经济是影响乡村性变动的两大动因,各因素的发展致使城乡差距缩小、乡村性水平减弱、城乡一体化发展趋势明显。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Rural development occupies an important position in arid regions of northwest China. Along with the implementation of Western Development Strategy and the Construction of New Socialist Countryside, rural development in arid regions of northwest China embraces a new round of change. Study on dynamic change features and influencing factors of rurality and its driving mechanism, taking Wuwei City of Gansu Province as an example, is of great theoretical and practical significance to the formation of rural development plans and strategies in northwest arid areas based on local conditions. With the support of the socio-economic statistic data of Wuwei City in 65 years, this paper constructed rurality index system with county as the basic unit, calculated the rurality indexes of various counties and districts by factor analysis method and analyzed the time evolution and space differentiation of rurality levels by virtue of simple linear regression model and rurality differentiation index model. Moreover, the influencing factors of rurality evolution and its driving mechanism were also discussed from aspects of social economy and technical economy. As the results showed, 1) The rurality indexes of various counties and districts in Wuwei City in 1949-2013 decreased on the whole, but the reducing degrees and speed differed. The annual decline of rurality indexes remained large in general, while the variation coefficient kept increasing. Three stages were divided according to rurality indexes: high rurality (1949-1978), moderate rurality (1979-2003) and low rurality (2004-2013). 2) The rurality differentiation indexes in various counties and districts showed a trend of fluctuations in growth, which indicated that the rurality differentiation was growing large, especially after the year of 2000, when the differentiation indexes fluctuated significantly and increased rapidly, and the rurality indexes changed greatly along with prominent unbalanced economic development. 3) Social economy and technical economy are two major factors affecting the change of rurality. During the process of industrial structure adjustment, traffic improvement, intensified government policy support, rural labor force transfer, advancement of agricultural mechanization level and adjustment of planting structure, the urban-rural gap is narrowing down, rurality is constantly weakening and the development of urban and rural integration becomes a major trend. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2017,37(4):585-594 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.04.012
|
|
关键词
|
乡村性
;
分异指数
;
驱动机制
;
武威市
|
|
地址
|
西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 甘肃, 兰州, 730070
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
西北师范大学青年教师科研能力提升计划项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5976422
|
参考文献 共
35
共2页
|
|
1.
张荣天. 基于县域尺度的江苏省乡村性空间格局演变及其机理研究.
人文地理,2013,28(2):91-97
|
被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
孙玉. 东北地区乡村性评价及时空分异.
地理研究,2015,34(10):1864-1874
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
龙花楼. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价.
地理学报,2009,64(4):426-434
|
被引
142
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
李红波. 乡村性研究综述与展望.
人文地理,2015,30(1):16-20,142
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Woods M. Advocating rurality? The repositioning of rural local government.
Journal of Rural Studies,1998,14(1):13-26
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Cloke P J. An index of rurality for England and Wales.
Regional Studies,1977,11(1):31-46
|
被引
53
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Cloke P. Rurality in England and Wales 1981:A replication of the 1971 index.
Regional Studies,1986,20(4):289-306
|
被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Cloke P.
The Countryside: Development, Conservation and an Increasingly Marketable Commodity. Policy and Change in Thatcher's Britain,1992:269-295
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Harrington V. Rurality in England and Wales1991: A replication and extension of the 1981 rurality index.
Sociologia Ruralis,1998,38(2):178-203
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Woods M.
Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring,2005
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Pini B. Focus groups, feminist research and farm women: Opportunities for empowerment in rural social research.
Journal of Rural Studies,2002,18:339-351
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Duenckmann F. The village in the mind: applying Q-methodology to reconstructing constructions of rurality.
Journal of Rural Studies,2010,26:284-295
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
龙花楼. 新世纪以来乡村地理学国际研究进展及启示.
经济地理,2012,32(8):1-7,135
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hidle K. Market, commodity, resource and strength: Logics of Norwegian rurality.
Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography,2006,60(3):189-198
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Paniagua Angel. Rurality, identity and morality in remote rural areas in northern Spain.
Journal of Rural Studies,2014,35:49-58
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
张小林. 乡村概念辨析.
地理学报,1998,53(4):365-371
|
被引
76
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
李孝坤. 重庆三峡库区县域乡村性评价.
经济地理,2013,33(6):125-131
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
张荣天. 转型期长江三角洲乡村性测度及其空间格局分析.
农业现代化研究,2014,35(2):204-208
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
周华. 江苏省乡村性及乡村转型发展耦合关系研究.
中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(9):48-55
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
马力阳. 我国北方农牧交错带县域乡村性空间分异及其发展类型.
经济地理,2015,35(9):126-133
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问