全国资源环境承载能力预警(2016版)的基点和技术方法进展
Basic points and progress in technical methods of early-warning of the national resource and environmental carrying capacity(V 2016)
查看参考文献27篇
|
文摘
|
本文探讨了资源环境承载能力预警机制的设计基点,阐释了资源环境承载能力、承载能力评价和预警的基本概念,创建了资源环境承载能力预警的理论模型,并制定了2016版全国资源环境承载能力预警的技术流程、评价体系、集成方法与类型划分等技术要点,为全国资源环境承载能力预警全面试行提供技术参考。研究表明:增长极限论是资源环境承载能力预警的理论基础;以县级行政区为评价单元的资源环境承载能力预警,分别开展陆域评价和海域评价,二者均包括基础评价和专项评价两部分,基础评价采用统一指标体系对所有县级行政区进行全覆盖评价,专项评价根据主体功能区规划选取特征指标对优化开发、重点开发和限制开发区域进行评价;采取“短板效应”原理确定资源环境超载、临界超载和不超载3种类型,结合资源环境耗损过程评价划分红色(极重警)、橙色(重警)、黄色(中警)、蓝色(轻警)和绿色(无警)5个预警等级,通过陆海统筹校验确定资源环境承载能力“三类五级”评价方案。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
This article discusses the design basis of the early- warning system of resource and environmental carrying capacity, explains the basic concepts of resource and environmental carrying capacity and its evaluation and early-warning mechanism, and builds the theoretical model and develops key technical points of the earlywarning of the national resource and environmental carrying capacity evaluation(2016 version), including technical process, evaluation system, integration methods, and classification approaches, which can provide an important technical reference for carrying out the early-warning of national resource and environmental carrying capacity overloading. This research shows that "the limits to growth" is the theoretical basis of the early-warning of resource and environmental carrying capacity. Based on the county- level administrative regions, this work carries out evaluation of terrestrial and marine resource and environmental carrying capacity respectively, both include basic and specific evaluations. The basic evaluation adopts unified basic indicators to conduct an overall regional evaluation; and the specific evaluation is conducted for different major functional zones, including optimized development zones, priority development zones, and restricted development zones, with corresponding characteristic indicators. Then the worst performing one of all indicators is used to classify the evaluated units, which separates the evaluated regions into resource and environmental overloading, critical overloading, and non-overloading areas. Combining with the evaluation results of resource and environmental consumption, five early- warning levels—red(extremely serious warning), orange(serious warning), yellow(medium-level warning), blue(slight warning), and green(no warning)are divided based on the classification results. Finally, the three carrying capacity types and five early-warning levels of resource and environmental are verified through the terrestrial-marine coordinated test. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2017,36(3):266-276 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.001
|
|
关键词
|
资源环境承载能力
;
预警
;
技术流程
;
评价体系
;
主体功能区
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
社会与环境 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
中国科学院科技服务网络计划(STS 计划)项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5957342
|
参考文献 共
27
共2页
|
|
1.
陈百明.
中国土地资源生产能力及人口承载量研究,1992
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础.
地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350
|
被引
279
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案.
地理学报,2015,70(2):186-201
|
被引
262
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
樊杰. 全国资源环境承载能力监测预警(2014版)学术思路与总体技术流程.
地理科学,2015,35(1):1-10
|
被引
103
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
樊杰. 生态文明建设中优化国土空间开发格局的经济地理学研究创新与应用实践.
经济地理,2013,33(1):1-8
|
被引
46
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
樊杰. 人文-经济地理学在生态文明建设中的学科价值与学术创新.
地理科学进展,2013,32(2):147-160
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
陆大道. 中速增长:中国经济的可持续发展.
地理科学,2015,35(10):1207-1219
|
被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
陆大道. 区域可持续发展研究的兴起与作用.
中国科学院院刊,2012,27(3):290-300,319
|
被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
毛汉英. 区域承载力定量研究方法探讨.
地球科学进展,2001,16(4):549-555
|
被引
91
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
王浩.
西北地区水资源合理配置和承载能力研究,2003
|
被引
94
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
夏军. 气候变化对我国水资源影响研究面临的机遇与挑战.
地球科学进展,2011,26(1):1-12
|
被引
99
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Bai X M. Society: Realizing China's urban dream.
Nature,2014,509:158-160
|
被引
90
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Cohen J E. How many people can the earth support.
The Science,1995,35(6):18-23
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Doorenbos J.
Crop water requirement: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24,1977
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Esty D C.
2005 Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship,2005:47-60
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Falkenmark M. Towards water security: Political determination and human adaptation crucial.
Natural Resources Forum,1998,22(1):37-51
|
被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Graymore M L M. Sustaining human carrying capacity: A tool for regional sustainability assessment.
Ecological Economics,2010,69(3):459-468
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Li W H.
Agro-ecological farming systems in China,2001
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Liu J G. China's road to sustainability.
Science,2010,328:50
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Meadows D H.
The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind,1972:208
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问