乡村生活空间研究进展及展望
Progress and Prospect on Rural Living Space
查看参考文献18篇
|
文摘
|
乡村生活空间是一定地域乡村居民居住、就业、消费和休闲等日常活动迭置而成的空间聚合体,也是一定乡村地域空间形式、空间内涵和空间意义内在关联的有机统一体。近期西方学术界对乡村生活空间的关注主要集中于两个方面:一是后生产主义乡村的生活主体多元化和生活空间异质化,二是被城市社会生活他者化和空间边缘化的不同弱势群体的乡村生活体验及空间建构。国内乡村生活空间研究具有两个鲜明特点:从研究内容看,注重乡村居民居住及就业空间变化研究,但乡村消费空间和休闲空间研究成果很少见;从研究方法看,空间形式的实证分析始终占据主导地位,空间内涵的结构分析和空间意义的人本分析有待深化。乡村生活空间研究能够丰富乡村地理学的研究视角,并可能为乡村发展政策制定提供理论指导。西方乡村生活空间研究难以提供标准模版,中国乡村生活空间研究资源得天独厚,“形式-内涵-意义”相统一的空间观能够帮助构造有效分析框架,基于空间行为分析的多种方法集成能够提供有力分析工具。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In the context of both contemporary human development transformation and humanism booming, ‘living space'has become a new perspective for human geographers to investigate the change of human-environment relationship, and the spatial view of integrating‘pattern-connotation-implication'has also become a new thinking to interpret the interaction of human activities and environment. So far, the researches on living space have focused mainly on the urban areas and their element space and space form. In contrast, little attention has been paid on the rural areas, juxtaposition space and three-dimensioned research. Rural living space refers to a polymer formed by the overlapping of everyday activities for rural residents in a certain territory, such as dwelling, employment, consumption and leisure, and also an organic body where spatial form, spatial implication and spatial meaning are inherently associated with each other. Due to differences in development environment and concrete national situations, post-modernization and counter-urbanization in developed countries has contributed to the post-rurality in rural space. There have been two highlights on rural living space in western academic circles. One indicates the diversification of living subjects in rural area in the context of post-productivism and the heterogenization of living space, and the other refers to life experience and spatial construction with respect to vulnerable groups who are“otherized”by urban social living or marginalized in space. Rural region in China has kept going through function transformation and spatial reconstruction, so it is a unique significance for the livable construction of rural living space. At the present stage, there are also two distinct characteristics studying on rural living space at home. From the view of contents, studies on changes in dwelling space and employment space of rural residents have been played more attention, while studies on consumption space and leisure space are as sparse as morning stars. From the view of methods, the empirical analysis in spatial forms has occupied a leading position, while the structural analysis in spatial implication and humanistic analysis in spatial meaning are expected to carry forward. Notably, it is hard for western studies on rural living space to be standardized. Studies on China's rural living space own their distinct context. Effective analysis framework can be made from the view of space mutually unified by form, implication and meaning, applying the rational of deconstructing spatial pattern by environment, perceiving spatial connotation by relationship and interpreting spatial implication by impacts, and powerful analysis tools can be created based on various methods of spatial behavior analysis, employing the research methods of combing quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, spatial analysis and statistical analysis; Which will focus on mainly exploring the features, mechanism and effects of the changes of the rural living space to reveal the change laws of rural human-environment. The expected achievements might amplify the research viewpoints, contents and methods of rural geography, and provide theoretical support for the sustainable development of the rural areas. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2017,37(3):375-385 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.03.007
|
|
关键词
|
乡村生活空间
;
空间形式
;
空间内涵
;
空间意义
|
|
地址
|
华中师范大学, 地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室, 湖北, 武汉, 430079
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
教育部规划基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5955645
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
|
1.
苟晓霞. 世界各国预期寿命差异及影响因素定量分析.
南京人口管理学院学报,2013,29(3):31-36
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
明艳. 我国人口健康水平区域间差异性与区域内不平衡性的聚类分析.
人口研究,2009,33(22):67-73
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
王学渊. 中国工业水污染的公众健康影响研究:来自肿瘤登记地区的经验证据.
中共浙江省委党校学报,2015(4):61-68
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
陶庄. 环境因子对人群健康影响的测量与评估方法.
环境与健康杂志,2010,27(4):342-345
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
韩洪云. 农药施用健康成本及其影响因素研究——基于粮食主产区农户调研数据.
中国农业大学学报,2011,16(5):163-170
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
苗艳青. 空气污染和健康需求:Grossman模型的应用.
世界经济,2010(6):140-160
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
于晓薇. 我国城市居民健康状况及影响因素研究.
中国人口 ·资源与环境,2010,20(2):151-156
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
林相森. 对中同医疗服务利用不平等问题的实证检验.
中国人口科学,2009(3):86-112
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
何雄浪. 经济活动空间分布的探究:技术溢出、环境污染与贸易自由化.
地理科学,2015,35(2):161-167
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
国家统计局.
中国统计年鉴,2006/2015
|
被引
337
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
国家统计局.
中国环境统计年鉴,2006/2015
|
被引
57
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
国家统计局.
中国农村统计年鉴,2006/2015
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
张荣天. 长江三角洲地区城镇化效率测度及空间关联格局分析.
地理科学,2016,36(4):433-439
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Rey S J. Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence.
Geographical Analysis,2001,33(3):195-214
|
被引
58
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
韩海彬. 环境约束下中国农业全要素生产率增长及收敛分析.
中国人口 ·资源与环境,2013,23(3):70-76
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
王新刚. 基于时空窗口改进的时空加权回归分析——以湖北省黄石市住房价格为例.
地理科学,2015,35(5):615-621
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
国家统计局.
中国人口统计年鉴,2006/2015
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
吕添贵. 人口城镇化与土地城镇化协调性测度及优化——以南昌市为例.
地理科学,2016,36(2):239-246
|
被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问