百年来的资源环境承载力研究:从理论到实践
A review of resources and environment carrying capacity research since the 20th Century:from theory to practice
查看参考文献168篇
|
文摘
|
从20世纪初期承载力概念提出,到21世纪作为描述发展限制的重要工具,从理论到实践,资源环境承载力研究走过百年,已成为衡量区域可持续发展的重要判据。本文简要回顾了资源环境承载力概念的源起与发展;系统梳理了从土地资源承载力、水资源承载力、环境承载力(容量),到资源环境承载力的研究进程;科学评述了基于生态足迹与虚拟土地、水足迹与虚拟水和能值分析与虚拟能量等方法开展的资源环境承载力研究的跨世纪进展。研究认为:资源环境承载力研究尚未形成一套统一的理论与方法体系,且研究结果的客观性与可比性一直存有争议。鉴于此,资源环境承载力研究应从理论到方法、从实践到应用,切实加强基础理论与承载机理、阈值率定与综合计量、技术标准与技术规范、定量评价与系统集成研究,以促进资源环境承载力研究的标准化与规范化、数字化与系统化,最终满足实用化与业务化的国家需求。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Carrying Capacity(CC)was first coined in biology and ecology in the 1920s,and later developed rapidly in related sciences such as natural resources science and environment science. The concept of Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity(RECC),from theoretical investigation to practical implementation,has become an effective and operational tool to describe development restrictions and quantify regional sustainable development. RECC research has become a hot topic methodologically and theoretically in ecology,geography and natural resource and environment. It primarily focuses on the ultimate limit of population and economic development on earth. After briefly looking at the origin of the concept and early headway,we summarize RECC research from land resource carrying capacity,water resource carrying capacity, and environmental carrying capacity(environment capacity). The following evaluating methods, including ecological footprint and virtual land(or the biological productive land by ecological footprint),water footprint and virtual water(or the global flow of virtual water),emergy analysis and virtual energy(or energy equilibrium),are considered as important research progresses in the past century. However,there is still lack of a standard set of evaluation theories and methodologies for RECC research in China and globally,leading to much debate over the objectivity and comparability of resultant figures. Concerning this issue,we propose that RECC research in the future should pay more attention to enhancing exploratory studies in basic theories and carrying mechanisms,thresholds determination and synthetical calculation,technological standards/manuals setting,measurable assessment and systematical integration. More effort is needed to promote the standardization,digitalization and systematization of RECC research in China before according with national practical and operational demands. |
|
来源
|
资源科学
,2017,39(3):379-395 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.18402/resci.2017.03.01
|
|
关键词
|
资源环境承载力
;
资源承载力
;
环境承载力
;
环境容量
;
承载力
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-7588 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;社会与环境 |
|
基金
|
西藏重大科技专项
;
国家重点研发计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5950218
|
参考文献 共
168
共9页
|
|
1.
毛汉英. 环渤海地区区域承载力研究.
地理学报,2001,56(3):363-371
|
被引
97
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
刘晓丽.
城市群地区资源环境承载力理论与实践,2013
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Pfaundler L. The World Economy in Light of Physics (Die Weltwirtschaft im Liche der Physik).
Deutsche Revue,1902,22(2):29-38
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Pfaundler L. The World Economy in Light of Physics (Die Weltwirtschaft im Liche der Physik).
Deutsche Revue,1902,22(2):171-182
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
USDA.
Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture 1906,1907
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Assessment M E. Ecosystems and human well-being:Biodiversity synthesis.
World Resources Institute,2005,42(1):77-101
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Imhoff M L. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production.
Nature,2004,429(24):870-873
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Running S W. A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere.
Science,2012,337(6101):1458-1459
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
王传艺.
未来地球计划战略研究议程2014-全球可持续发展研究战略优先领域,2015
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
樊杰.
国家汶川地域灾后重建规划资源环境承载能力评价,2009
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
樊杰.
玉树地震灾后恢复重建资源环境承载能力评价,2010
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
樊杰.
芦山地震灾后恢复重建资源环境承载能力评价,2014
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
樊杰. 鲁甸地震灾后重建的综合地理分析与对策研讨.
地理科学进展,2014,33(8):1011-1018
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Cohen J E.
How Many People Can the Earth Support?,1995
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Dhondt A A. Carrying capacity:A confusing concept.
Acta Oecologica/Oceologia Generalis,1988,9(4):337-346
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Graymore M.
Journey to Sustainability:Small Regions,Sustainable Carrying Capacity and Sustainability Assessment Methods,2005
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Price D. Carrying capacity reconsidered.
Population and Environment,1999,21(1):5-26
|
被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Seidl I. Carrying capacity reconsidered:From Malthus'population theory to cultural carrying capacity.
Ecological Economics,1999,31(3):395-348
|
被引
82
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Clarke A L. Assessing the carrying capacity of the Florida Keys.
Population & Environment,2002,23(4):405-418
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
陈春生. 环境容量受力分析与都市成长管理之研究-以台北都会区水资源个案为例.
国立台湾大学建筑与城乡研究学报,1987,3(1):133-144
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问