论土地利用转型的研究框架
Discussion on land use transition research framework
查看参考文献86篇
|
文摘
|
当前,土地变化研究尚缺乏统一的理论指导。探索土地利用转型理论对构建土地变化研究的理论基础具有重要意义。本文试图梳理土地利用转型研究的缘起、拓展及启示,辨析土地利用转型与土地利用变化的内涵差异,构建土地利用转型的研究框架。结果表明:①耕地及城乡建设用地利用转型研究对构建土地利用转型的研究框架具有重要价值;②土地利用转型与土地利用变化在基本类型、时间尺度、空间尺度、价值主体、驱动因素、轨迹特征和结果/影响方面存在显著差异;③土地利用转型的研究框架涵盖转型诊断、机制研究和效应研究。其中,转型诊断的关键在于,从数量变化视角、景观格局变化视角和经营格局变化视角,以及外部性视角和政策发展视角,构建土地利用空间形态及功能形态的分析指标和转型的诊断准则;转型机制表现为人口、经济、技术、制度、文化和区位因素等土地利用变化深层驱动因素的级联驱动效应。转型机制研究应当着重探讨土地利用空间转型与功能转型的互动机制环;土地利用转型效应包括社会、经济、环境3个方面;④1961-2011年法国耕地利用转型能够支撑本文提出的研究框架及中国耕地保护创新。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Land change has been a hot topic in geographical research. The overarching and convincing theories of land change science, however, have not emerged. Establishment of land use transition theory is of significance for the theory basis of land change science. This paper attempts to establish a research framework of land use transition based on summarizing the development and implications of land use transition research and clarifying the differences between land use transition and land use change. Results show that transition research of artificial ecosystems, such as cultivated land, rural housing land and urban land, is of significance. Land use transition is distinguished from land use change on several aspects, such as fundamental types, temporal scale, spatial scale, agents, driving forces, trajectory, and results or effects. Research framework of land use transition covers transition diagnosis, mechanism research and effects research. Key issues of transition diagnosis are the establishment of measuring indices and diagnosis principles of land use spatial and functional morphologies from the perspectives of quantity change, landscape pattern change and management pattern change, and of land use externality and land use policy development. Mechanism of land use transition behaves as cascading effects of underlying driving factors of land use change, including demographic, economic, technological, institutional, cultural, and location factors. Mechanism research should place emphasis on interaction between land use spatial transition and functional transition. Effects of land use transition covers at least 17 themes relating to social, economic and environmental dimensions. Cultivated land use transition in France in 1961-2011 confirms the research framework of land use transition and is beneficial to the innovation of cultivated land protection in China. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2017,72(3):471-487 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201703009
|
|
关键词
|
土地利用转型
;
土地变化科学
;
格局
;
功能
;
研究框架
|
|
地址
|
广州大学地理科学学院国土与城镇规划研究所, 广州, 510006
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
广东省自然科学基金
;
广东省教育厅青年创新人才项目
;
广州市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目
;
广州市属高校科研项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5946227
|
参考文献 共
86
共5页
|
|
1.
Turner B L. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2007,104(52):20666-20671
|
被引
183
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Lambin E. Key findings of LUCC on its research questions.
Global Change Newsletter,2005,63:12-14
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Foster D. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation.
BioScience,2003,53(1):77-88
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Perring M P. Global environmental change effects on ecosystems: The importance of landuse legacies.
Global Change Biology,2016,22(4):1361-1371
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Seto K C. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2012,109(20):7687-7692
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Guneralp B. Evidence of urban land teleconnections and impacts on hinterlands.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013,5(5):445-451
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Mather A S.
Global Forest Resources,1990
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Mather A S. The forest transition.
Area,1992,24(4):367-379
|
被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Grainger A. National land use morphology: Patterns and possibilities.
Geography,1995,80(3):235-245
|
被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
龙花楼. 土地利用转型—土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径.
地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(1):87-90
|
被引
69
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
龙花楼. 区域土地利用转型分析－－以长江沿线样带为例.
自然资源学报,2002,17(2):144-149
|
被引
76
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Long H L. Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China.
Land Use Policy,2007,24(1):141-153
|
被引
64
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
DeFries R S. Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2004,2(5):249-257
|
被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Foley J A. Global consequences of land use.
Science,2005,309(22):570-574
|
被引
684
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Lambin E F. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change.
Land Use Policy,2010,27(2):108-118
|
被引
135
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展.
地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138
|
被引
202
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理.
地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618
|
被引
150
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Chen R S. The impact of rural out-migration on land use transition in China: Past, present and trend.
Land Use Policy,2014,40(4):101-110
|
被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Liu Y S. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making.
Land Use Policy,2014,40(1):6-12
|
被引
85
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Zhu F K. Functional transition of the rural settlement: Analysis of land-use differentiation in a transect of Beijing, China.
Habitat International,2014,41(1):262-271
|
被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问