贵州省乡村贫困空间格局与形成机制分析
Spatial Patterns and Determinants of Rural Poverty: A Case of Guizhou Province, China
查看参考文献32篇
|
文摘
|
以贫困态势严峻、区域内部贫困差异大的贵州省为研究区,分析了贵州省区县层面乡村贫困的空间异质性和空间依赖性格局,定量测度了乡村贫困空间差异的影响因素和因素效应的空间差异性,进而归纳了贵州省乡村贫困的形成机制。结果发现,贵州省区县乡村贫困具有时空稳定性,呈现出东、南、西部高而中、北部低的“马蹄”形空间异质性格局。区县贫困存在较强的空间依赖性,“高-高”型贫困地域即空间贫困陷阱区域,集聚分布在贵州省的东南部、南部。定量模型发现,坡度、到所在市中心的距离、青少年人口占比、少数民族人口占比是导致贵州区县层面乡村贫困空间差异的显著因素,且这些因素的效应水平呈现出不同的空间模式。产业发展受限、劳动力流动性差、金融和人力资本积累不足是贵州贫困空间形成的主导机制。最后建议扶贫政策层面应将基于地方和基于人的政策相结合。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
China has been a long-period fast economic growth after its opening policy. The whole degree of poverty in China has decreased sharply, which plays an important role in fulfilling Millennium Development Goals (MDG) made by the United Nations. As a developing country, however, China still has a challenge of reducing poverty and promoting regional development. Rural poverty is still a serious problem in rural China, especially in mountainous or ethnic areas. Different scales of governments in China develop much poverty-alleviation policy, but the efficacy of these policy are sometimes low because“one size fits all”policy always neglect regional difference in poverty resulting from different contexts of different places. Spatial patterns and determinants of regional poverty is a key theme for scholars from many disciplines. Giving that determinants of rural poverty in different places are different and the effects of significant factor are dependent on spatial scales, there is a need for more empirical evidences at different scales or in different regions. Furthermore there is little study to explore the spatial variations of effects of determinants. The present article can fill these gap to some extent through analyzing the determinants of county-level poverty and its spatial variation of their effects within Guizhou Province in the southwestern China. The rate of county-level poverty is largely different within this province. Based on methods of OLS regression, spatial econometric and geographic weighted regression (GWR), this article studies spatial variations and determinants of rural poverty at the county level. The results show that rate of rural poverty is higher in the eastern, southern, western counties than middle and northern counterparts. There is a significant spatial autocorrelation of rural poverty, for index of Moran's I is between 0.45 and 0.55, which indicates that poverty of neighboring counties have a positive effect on the poverty of a specific county. Some counties with a high-high poor pattern fall into spatial trap of poverty based on results of index of Local Moran's I. These counties are located at southeast and southern parts of Guizhou and have a high proportion of ethnic minorities'population. For the determinants, the OLS estimation results show that topographic slope, distance to a local urban center, the percentage of teenagers, the percentage of ethnic minorities are key determinants of spatial variations in rural poverty at the county level. The effects of these four factors are found to have different spatial patterns based on GWR analysis. There is no significant effect for distance to the provincial capital on the rural poverty. The above results have important policy implication. The core implication is to combine place-based and people-based policy, which surpass the current Poverty-Targeting-Alleviation (jing zhun fu pin) initiatives dominating poverty-reduction policy of China's governments. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2017,37(2):217-227 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.007
|
|
关键词
|
乡村贫困
;
空间格局
;
空间自相关
;
地理加权回归
;
贵州
|
|
地址
|
1.
北京师范大学地理科学学部, 北京, 100875
2.
吉首大学商学院, 湖南, 吉首, 416000
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
北京师范大学“985”专项研究项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5939558
|
参考文献 共
32
共2页
|
|
1.
Alkire S. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement.
Journal of Public Economics,2011,95(7):476-487
|
被引
123
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
刘艳华. 中国农村多维贫困地理识别及类型划分.
地理学报,2015,70(6):993-1007
|
被引
106
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
王艳慧. 县级多维贫困度量及其空间分布格局研究——以连片特困区扶贫重点县为例.
地理科学,2013,33(12):1489-1497
|
被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Ravallion M. Poor areas, or only poor people?.
Journal of Regional science,1999,39(4):689-711
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
刘卫东.
经济地理学思维,2013
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Green A E.
The geography of poverty and wealth,1994
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Kodras J E. The changing map of American poverty in an era of economic restructuring and political realignment.
Economic Geography,1997,73(1):67-93
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Curtis Katherine J. Spatial variation in poverty-generating processes: Child poverty in the United States.
Social Science Research,2012(41):14-59
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Epprecht M. How remote are Vietnam's ethnic minorities? An analysis of spatial patterns of poverty and inequality.
The Annals of Regional Science,2011,46(2):349-368
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ravallion M. China's (uneven) progress against poverty.
Journal of Development Economics,2007,82(1):1-42
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
万广华. 中国沿海与内地贫困差异之解析:基于回归的分解方法.
经济研究,2008,12:75-84
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
丁建军. 中国11个集中连片特困区贫困程度比较研究——基于综合发展指数计算的视角.
地理科学,2014,34(12):1418-1427
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
郭来喜. 中国贫困地区环境类型研究.
地理研究,1995,24(2):1-7
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Ravallion M.
Spatial poverty traps,1862
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Bird K. Livelihoods and Chronic Poverty in Semi-arid Zimbabwe.
World Development,2003,31(3):591-610
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Okwi P O. Spatial determinants of poverty in rural Kenya.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2007,104(43):16769-16774
|
被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
曲玮. 自然地理环境的贫困效应检验--自然地理条件对农村贫困影响的实证分析.
中国农村经济,2012(2):21-34
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
丁文广. 甘肃省不同地理区域灾害与贫困耦合关系量化研究.
经济地理,2013,33(3):28-35
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
丁建军. 武陵山片区经济增长益贫性与空间差异演变——基于2000-2011年县域数据的实证分析.
地理研究,2014,33(5):948-960
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Gustafsson B. The ethnic minority-majority income gap in rural China during transition.
Economic Development and Cultural Change,2003,51(4):805-822
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问