帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

情侣沟通模式及匹配对抑郁的影响
The influence of college dating couples ’ communication patterns and matching on depression

查看参考文献16篇

徐洁 1   王可欣 2   陈晨 1   周奕欣 1   霍凯芳 1   周明洁 1 *  
文摘 目的探讨沟通模式及匹配对情侣抑郁症状的影响。方法通过方便抽样原则选取全国9所高校在校大学生情侣300对,并使用沟通方式问卷及流调中心抑郁量表对其进行测查。数据采用二次响应面方程进行分析。结果(1)要求/回避沟通男女分值为(3.93±1.10)分,(4.10± 1.09)分,建设沟通男女分值为(6.65±1.70)分,(6.49±1/74)分,完全回避沟通男女分值为(3.85±1.70)分,(4.02±1.98)分,男女生抑郁分值为(1.60±0.42)分,(1.61±0.42)分;男生抑郁与自身的要求/回避沟通呈正相关(r=0.222,P<0.01),男生抑郁与女生的要求/回避沟通呈正相关(r=0.118,P<0.05)o女生抑郁与积极建设性沟通呈负相关(r=-0.407,P<0.01),与男生积极建设性沟通呈负相关(r= -0.306,P<0.01) 。 (2)男女要求/回避沟通(t=5.489,b=0.267,P<0.01;t= 2.538,b = 0.138, P<0.05)都正向预测自身抑郁水平;男女建设性沟通负向预测自身抑郁水平(t=-5.158,b = 0.382,P<0.01; t= -4.539,b = 0.299, P<0.01);男生完全回避沟通分数可正向预测自身抑郁水平(t=1.918,b = 0.174,P< 0.05)。(3)男生建设性沟通可负向预测女生的抑郁(t=-3.306,b = 0.189,P<0.01)。(4)男女的抑郁水平还受到双方沟通模式一致性影响。结论建设性沟通有助于情侣的心理健康并减少抑郁的发生。要求回避沟通和完全回避沟通会增加抑郁发生风险。
其他语种文摘 Objective To explore the influence of lovers' communication patterns and matching on their depression symptoms. Methods 300 pairs of dating couple were recruited from nine universities in Hebei,Henan,Beijing and Shanghai by convenience sampling principle. They were asked to fulfill the communication patterns questionnaire-short form and center for epidemiologic studies depression scale. Polynomial regression model with response surface method was adopted to analyze the results. Results (1) The scores of demands/withdraw,completely avoid,constructive communication of boys and girls were (3.93± 1.10,4.10±1.09)(6.65±1.70,6.49±1.74)(3.85±1.70,4.02±1.98),and the scores of depression of boys and girls were (1.60±0.42,1.61 ±0.42).Boys depression was significantly positive correlated with its own demands/ withdraw communication(r= 0.222, P<0.01),and significantly positive correlated with girls demands/withdraw communication (r=0.118, P< 0.05).Girls depression was significantly negative correlated with constructive communication of their own(r= -0.407,P<0.01),and significantly negative correlated with the boys constructive communication (r= -0.306, P<0.01). (2) Demand/withdraw communication could predict their own depression positively both for males and females(t=5.489,b = 0.267,P<0.01,t=2.538,b = 0.138, P<0.05).Constructive communication could predict depression negatively both for males and females (t= -5.158,b = 0.382,P<0.01; t=-4.539,b = 0.299, P<0.001).Males' avoidance communication pattern could predict their own depression positively(t= 1.918,b = 0.174,P<0.05).(3) Males' constructive communication scores could predict females' depression negatively(t=-3.306,b = 0.189,P<0.01).(4)The consistency of communication pattern could influence couples' depression. Conclusion Constructive communication contributes to lovers’ mental health and reduce the probability of their depression; Demand/withdraw communication and avoidance communication increase their depression risk.
来源 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志 ,2017,26(2):153-157 【扩展库】
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2017.02.012
关键词 沟通方式 ; 抑郁 ; 成对样本 ; 二次响应面 ; 情侣
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所,中国科学院大学, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 清华大学新闻与传播学院, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1674-6554
学科 医药、卫生
基金 国家科技基础性工作专项 ;  中国科学院心理健康重点实验室课题项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:5937234

参考文献 共 16 共1页

1.  Proulx C M. Marital quality and personal well-being: a meta analysis. J Marriage Fam,2007,69(3):576-593 被引 2    
2.  Heaven P C L. Personality and conflict communication patterns in cohabiting couples. J Res Pers,2006,40(5):829-840 被引 1    
3.  Eileen L Z. Self-and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: qssociations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol,2011,64(7):449-462 被引 1    
4.  Christensen A. Communication,conflict,and psychological distance in nondistressed,clinic,and divorcing couples. J Consult Clin Psychol,1991,59(3):458-463 被引 3    
5.  刘国艳. 父母婚姻质量与幼儿抑郁行为的关系. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2016,25(6):502-505 被引 7    
6.  张锦涛. 夫妻对沟通模式感知差异与双方婚姻质量的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(3):327-330 被引 9    
7.  Edwards J R. Ten difference score myths. Organ Res Meth,2001,4(3):265-287 被引 4    
8.  Radloff L S. The CES-D scale:a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psycholmeasurem,1977,1(3):385-401 被引 210    
9.  李育辉. 成对数据分析之行动者-对象互依性模型(APIM). 心理科学进展,2010,18(8):1321-1328 被引 6    
10.  张珊珊. 二次响应面回归方法及其在个体-环境匹配研究中的使用. 心理科学进展,2012,20(6):825-833 被引 5    
11.  Christensen A. Gender and social structure in the demand/ withdraw pattern of marital conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol,1990,59(1):73-81 被引 5    
12.  Jacobson N S. The politics of intimacy. Behavior Therapist,1989,12(2):29-32 被引 1    
13.  Jennifer F M. Attachment anxiety,conflict behaviors, and depressive symptoms in emerging adults ' romantic relationships. J Adult Devel,2012(1):1-7 被引 1    
14.  Gabriel B. Depression, marital satisfaction and communication in couples: investigating gender differences. Behav Ther,2010,41(3):306-316 被引 3    
15.  Roberts J E. Adult attachment security and symptoms of depression: the mediating roles of dysfunctional attitudes and low self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol,1996,70(2):310-320 被引 7    
16.  Slatcher R B. Effects of global and contextualized personality on relationship satisfaction. J Res Personal,2009,43(4):624-633 被引 1    
引证文献 1

1 朱迪 大学生情侣社交孤独及其匹配对关系质量的预测 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2018,27(6):556-560
被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号