不同近地表水文条件下矿山弃土对土壤细沟可蚀性的影响---以攀枝花盐边县龙蟒矿山为例
Effects of Discard Soil in Mine on Soil Erodibility Under Different Hydrological States -An Example of Longmang Mine of Yanbian County,Panzhihua City
查看参考文献19篇
|
文摘
|
以攀枝花市盐边县红格龙蟒矿山李家河排土场、未被开采过的矿区灌草地和耕地3种土壤为研究对象,基于土壤水蚀预报模型(WEPP)中的细沟侵蚀模型,采用100,200,300,400,500,600ml/min的流量对灌草地、耕地和矿山排土场土壤分别进行排水、饱和以及渗流状态下的冲刷试验,查明其可蚀性(Kr)的变化。结果表明:(1)径流剪切力与土壤剥蚀率之间存在较显著的指数关系(P<0.01);(2)流量与土壤剥蚀率之间存在较为显著的指数关系(P<0.01),土壤剥蚀率随流量的增加呈指数形式增加;(3)在排水、饱和及渗流3种水文条件下,灌草地土壤Kr值分别为0.000 2,0.000 5,0.000 9m/s,耕地土壤Kr值分别为0.000 3,0.000 9,0.001 8m/s,排土场土壤Kr值分别为0.002 3,0.066 9,0.094 6m/s。可见,在同一水文条件下,土壤Kr值均表现为排土场>耕地>灌草地;(4)在同一土地利用类型下,土壤Kr值均表现为渗流状态>饱和状态>排水状态,这是由于渗流状态下土壤同时受到垂直方向和地表径流的双重作用,导致土壤可蚀性最差,在饱和状态下,土壤抗蚀性也相应地变差,在排水状态下,由于地表径流可以自由下渗,土壤抗蚀性相对较好。综上可见,土壤中垂直水力梯度的变化会显著影响土壤可蚀性,矿山土壤经过人为扰动之后抗蚀性也会呈显著降低趋势,在未来土壤侵蚀研究中亟需进一步开展深入研究。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
To explore the changes in rill erodibility(Krvalue)among soils in waste dump land,shrub grassland and cultivated land,soil samples were collected in the shrub grassland and cultivated land without mining, and waste dump land of Hongge Longmang Mine of Yanbian County,Panzhihua City.A series of scour experiments were carried out to simulate rill erosion process under water discharge rates ranging from 100 ml/min to 600ml/min in the study area.Changes in soil detachment rate under drainage,saturated and seepage conditions were also measured.Results showed that a significant exponential relationship between flow shear stress and soil detachment rate appeared (P <0.01).Meanwhile,a significant exponential relationship between flow discharges and soil detachment rates was also observed(P<0.01).For the soil of shrub grassland,Krvalues were estimated at 0.000 2m/s,0.000 5m/s,and 0.000 9m/s under drainage state,saturated state and seepage state,respectively,while the Krvalues for soil of cultivated land were estimated at 0.000 3m/s,0.000 9m/s,and 0.001 8m/s,respectively.Meanwhile,for the soil of waste dump land,Krvalues were estimated at 0.002 3m/s,0.066 9m/s,and 0.094 6m/s under drainage state, saturated state and seepage state,respectively.Those results indicated that Krvalues for the soil of waste dump land were higher than those for the cultivated land and shrub grassland.Significant differences in the rill erodibility were observed among soils in the three land use types due to different soil particle sizes.For all soils,soil Krvalues were the highest under seepage condition due to high vertical hydraulic pressure,while soil Krvalues were the lowest under drainage condition due to low vertical hydraulic pressure.At the same time,Krvalues for soil under saturated condition were higher than that under drainage condition,which may be because higher vertical hydraulic pressure appeared under saturated condition than under drainage condition. These results indicated that Krvalues of rill erosion varied among different vertical hydraulic conditions and impacts of hydraulic gradient of groundwater on soil erosion process should be paid more attention in further studies. |
|
来源
|
水土保持学报
,2016,30(6):67-72 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.06.012
|
|
关键词
|
矿山排土场
;
水文条件
;
土壤可蚀性
;
土地利用类型
;
细沟侵蚀
|
|
地址
|
1.
四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院, 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室, 成都, 610101
2.
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室, 成都, 610041
3.
四川农业大学水利水电学院, 雅安, 625014
4.
云南农业大学资源与环境学院, 昆明, 650201
5.
四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院, 成都, 610101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1009-2242 |
|
学科
|
农业基础科学 |
|
基金
|
四川省应用基础研究计划项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
;
国家973计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5879677
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
|
1.
Bian Z F. Environmental issues from coal mining and their solutions.
矿业科学技术(英文版),2010,20(2):215-223
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
吕钊. 生产建设项目弃渣(土)场水土流失特征与防治措施.
中国水土保持科学,2013,11(3):118-126
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
张孝中. 神府东胜煤田弃土弃渣体径流水动力学特性研究.
水土保持通报,2015,35(2):76-81
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Zhang L T. Dynamic processes of soil erosion by runoff on engineered landforms derived from expressway construction:A case study of typical steep spoil heap.
Catena,2015,128(5):108-121
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Nouwakpo S K. Impact of vertical hydraulic gradient on rill erodibility and critical shear stress.
Soil Science Society of America Journal,2010,74(6):1914-1921
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
张科利. 中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算.
土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13
|
被引
168
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
梁音. 中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性K值计算与宏观分布.
中国水土保持,2013(10):35-40
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
张晴雯. 细沟侵蚀可蚀性参数及土壤临界抗剪应力的有理(实验)求解方法.
中国科学院研究生院学报,2004,21(4):468-475
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Li Z W. Rill erodibility as influenced by soil and land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China.
Biosystems Engineering,2015,129(1):248-257
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
王志刚. 不同近地表水文条件下紫色土坡面土壤侵蚀过程研究.
水土保持通报,2007,27(6):9-11
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Wang G Q. Relationship between soil erodibility and modeled infiltration rate in different soils.
Journal of Hydrology,2015,528(9):408-418
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Ahirwal J. Assessment of soil properties of different land uses generated due to surface coal mining activities in tropical Sal(Shorea robusta)forest,India.
Catena,2016,140(5):155-163
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
牛耀彬. 工程措施条件下堆积体坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学特性.
中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):105-111
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
张乐涛. 工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程.
农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102
|
被引
60
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Silva L F D. Susceptibility to rill erosion of a 12-year-old soil reconstructed after coal mining.
International Journal of River Basin Management,2016,14(4):1-15
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
李鹏. 不同土地利用方式对干热河谷地区土壤可蚀性的影响.
水土保持研究,2011,31(4):16-19
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Zhang L. Effects of vegetation on runoff and soil erosion on reclaimed land in an opencast coal-mine dump in a loess area.
Catena,2015,128(5):44-53
|
被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Yang D J. Impact on soil physical qualities by the subsidence of coal mining:A case study in Western China.
Environmental Earth Sciences,2016,75(8):1-14
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
刘振波. 模拟降雨下土壤前期含水量对土壤可蚀性的影响.
生态环境,2008,17(1):397-402
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问