帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

不孕不育症患者社会关注带来的压力与心理健康和主观幸福感的关系及传统-现代性的调节作用研究
Relationship between Pressure of Infertility Patients from Social Concern and Mental Health and Subjective Well-being:Moderating Effect of Tradition-modernity

查看参考文献28篇

文摘 目的探讨不孕不育症患者社会关注带来的压力与心理健康和主观幸福感的关系及传统-现代性的调节作用。方法对2014年9-12月在北京市某两家三级甲等医院生殖中心门诊就诊的不孕不育症患者216例进行问卷调查,共发放问卷216份,回收有效问卷215份,有效回收率为99.5%。采用心理健康量表(MHI-5)测量不孕不育症患者的心理健康水平;采用生活满意度量表(SWLS)测量不孕不育症患者的主观幸福感;采用传统-现代性量表测量不孕不育症患者的传统-现代性;采用社会关注维度测量社会关注对不孕不育症患者带来的压力。相关性分析采用Pearson相关分析;影响因素分析采用分层回归分析。结果215例患者心理健康、主观幸福感、传统-现代性、社会关注带来的压力得分分别为(4.4±0.9)、(4.1±1.2)、(3.6±0.7)、(3.0±0.7)分。心理健康得分与主观幸福感得分呈直线正相关(r=0.208,P<0.05),与社会关注带来的压力得分呈直线负相关(r=-0.315,P<0.05),而与传统-现代性得分无直线相关性(r=-0.013,P>0.05);主观幸福感得分与社会关注带来的压力得分呈直线负相关(r=-0.272,P<0.05),而与传统-现代性得分无直线相关性(r=0.094,P>0.05);传统-现代性得分与社会关注带来的压力得分无直线相关性(r=0.105,P>0.05)。当控制了人口学变量后,社会关注带来的压力得分及社会关注带来的压力得分与传统-现代性得分的交互作用是心理健康、主观幸福感得分的影响因素(P<0.05)。低传统-现代性得分而高社会关注带来的压力得分患者心理健康、主观幸福感得分最低;高传统-现代性得分缓和了社会关注带来的压力得分与心理健康、主观幸福感得分之间的负相关关系。结论不孕不育症患者感受到的来自社会性的压力越高,其心理健康状况越差,主观幸福感越低。传统性可以缓和不孕不育症患者对社会关注的担忧与心理健康及主观幸福感之间的负向关系。
其他语种文摘 Objective To explore relationship between pressure of infertility patients from social concern and mental health and subjective well-being:moderating effect of tradition-modernity.Methods 216 infertility patients,who received treatment in Outpatient of Reproductive Center of two first-class hospitals at grade three in Beijing from September to December in 2014,were investigated by questionnaire survey,216 questionnaires were distributed and 215 valid questionnaires were returned with an effective response rate of 99.5%.The level of mental health of infertility patients was measured by Mental Health Index(MHI-5);their subjective well-being was measured by using Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS);their tradition-modernity was measured by Tradition-Modernity Scale;their pressure brought by social concern was measured by Social Concern Dimension.Pearson correlation analysis was applied in correlation analysis;hierarchical regression analysis was used in influence factors analysis.Results The scores of 215 patients in mental health,subjective well-being,tradition-modernity,pressure brought by social concern were(4.4±0.9),(4.1±1.2),(3.6±0.7),(3.0±0.7) respectively.There was a linearly positive correlation between mental health scores and subjective well-being scores(r=0.208,P<0.05),and a linearly negative correlation between mental health scores and pressure of social concern scores(r=-0.315,P<0.05),but there was no linear correlation between mental health scores and tradition-modernity scores(r=-0.013,P>0.05);subjective well-being scores was linearly and negatively correlated with scores of pressure brought by social concern(r=-0.272,P<0.05),but not linearly correlated with tradition-modernity scores(r=0.094,P>0.05);tradition-modernity scores and pressure brought by social concerns scores were not linearly correlated(r=0.105,P>0.05).When the demographic variables were controlled,scores of pressure brought by social concern and interactive effects between scores of pressure brought by social concern and scores of tradition-modernity were the influencing factors of scores of mental health and subjective well-being(P<0.05).The scores of mental health and subjective well-being among patients with low scores of tradition-modernity and high scores of pressure brought by social concern were the lowest;high scores of tradition-modernity eased the negative correlation between scores of pressure brought by social concern and scores of mental health and subjective well-being.Conclusion The greater social pressure the infertility patients can feel,the worse their mental health status is and the lower subjective well-being is.Tradition can relax the negative correlation between worry of patients in social concern and their mental health and subjective well-being.
来源 中国全科医学 ,2016,19(31):3861-3865 【扩展库】
DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.31.021
关键词 不孕不育症 ; 社会关注 ; 心理健康 ; 主观幸福感 ; 传统-现代性
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1007-9572
学科 外科学;妇产科学
基金 国家科技基础性工作专项
文献收藏号 CSCD:5861369

参考文献 共 28 共2页

1.  徐凤娇. 女性不孕症患者病因及健康教育对策探讨. 中国健康教育,2010,26(5):391-392 被引 3 次    
2.  Inhorn M C. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies:illustrations from Egypt. Social Science & Medicine,2003,56(9):1837-1851 被引 3 次    
3.  方玉. 不孕症妇女自然周期过早内源性黄体生成素峰的发生与排卵障碍的相关性研究. 中国全科医学,2015,18(2):162-165 被引 1 次    
4.  Williams K E. Mood disorders and fertility in women:a critical review of the literature and implications for future research. Hum Reprod Update,2007,13(6):607-616 被引 4 次    
5.  Anderson K M. Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic. J Psychosom Res,2003,54(4):353-355 被引 4 次    
6.  Verhaak C M. A longitudinal,prospective study on emotional adjustment before,during and after consecutive fertility treatment cycles. Hum Reprod,2005,20(8):2253-2260 被引 12 次    
7.  田一梅. 针对发病相关因素进行健康教育在女性不孕不育中的应用效果. 临床合理用药杂志,2015,8(7):141-142 被引 1 次    
8.  Reija K. Infertility,mental disorders and well-being--a nationwide survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2010,89(5):677-682 被引 1 次    
9.  Verhaak C M. Women's emotional adjustment to IVF:a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update,2007,13(1):27-36 被引 4 次    
10.  Monga M. Impact of infertility on quality of life,marital adjustment,and sexual function. Urology,2004,63(1):126-130 被引 3 次    
11.  邓莉. 人群心理社会因素及综合健康水平的监测. 中国公共卫生,2003,19(1):115-117 被引 4 次    
12.  Newton C R. The fertility problem inventory:measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertil Steril,1999,72(1):54-62 被引 22 次    
13.  袁野. 丁克家庭的心理学成因初探. 湖南第一师范学报,2007,7(3):165-167 被引 1 次    
14.  周晓燕. 高学历青年的婚姻问题--2002年中国高学历青年婚恋及生育观的调查报告. 中国青年政治学院学报,2002,21(4):21-26 被引 1 次    
15.  周艳丽. 论影响城市知识女性生育意愿的社会因素. 安阳师范学院学报,2011,32(3):141-143 被引 1 次    
16.  Zegers-Hochschild F. The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology(ICMART) and the World Health Organization(WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology,2009. Hum Reprod,2009,24(11):2683-2687 被引 18 次    
17.  Berwick D M. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care,1991,29(2):169-176 被引 7 次    
18.  Diener E. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess,1985,49(1):71-75 被引 167 次    
19.  Cheung F M. Indigenous Chinese personality constructs:is the five-factor model complete?. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2001,32(4):407-433 被引 18 次    
20.  Tzelgov J. Suppression situations in psychological research:definitions,implications,and applications. Psychological Bulletin,1973,2(109):524-536 被引 1 次    
引证文献 1 篇

1 卢涛 连续高强度运动刺激对大学生压力影响研究 基因组学与应用生物学,2018,37(11):5152-5157
被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号