团队领导与团队有效性:基于社会认同理论的多层次研究
Team leadership and team effectiveness: A multilevel study through the lens of social identity theory
查看参考文献100篇
|
文摘
|
随着工作团队的广泛应用,团队有效性已成为研究者与管理者关注的焦点。团队领导作为影响有效性的关键因素,其作用机制得到研究者的日益关注。虽然团队领导的多层特征与中介机制已进入研究者的视野,但多层交互作用机制的实证探讨还较少;领导测量的情境性尚未得到充分关注。本研究在双通道团队变革型领导模型和社会认同理论基础上,提出基于团队、个体各自独立水平与两者交互层面的团队变革型领导作用机制模型。研究将在开发双通道团队变革型领导行为的情景判断测验基础上;通过企业问卷调查分阶段收集多源数据,整合多层结构方程与多层线性模型的数据分析,验证假设中的团队层面变量(团队聚焦变革型领导、关系认同、集体认同)与个体层面变量(个体聚焦变革型领导、领导成员交换、领导导向关系认同)之间的交互关系与边界条件,及对有效性的影响。研究结果一方面可拓展现有的团队领导理论,另一方面可为团队领导选拔等实践应用提供支持。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
With the wide use of work teams in organizations, academics have increasingly focused on team and team effectiveness. As one of the fundamental characteristics of team effectiveness, team leadership and its mechanism has attained more and more attention. Till now, multi-level and mediation effect during team process of leadership have been illustrated; however, empirical research concerning cross-level interaction effects of leadership is still scarce. Moreover, the situational issues of leadership assessment have been short of concern. The present project proposed a conceptual framework, on the basis of Dual-Level Transformational Leadership Theory and Social Identify Theory, describing how transformational leadership affects team and individual effectiveness through multi-level processes (team level, individual level, and cross-levels, respectively). Specifically, we will develop a situational judgment test of the dual-level transformational leadership in Chinese context and will test the interaction effects of team-level variables (e.g., group-focused transformational leadership, relational identification, collective identification) and individual-level variables (e.g., individual-focused transformational leadership, LMX, relational identification to leader) and the boundary conditions and their effects on effectiveness via multi-wave questionnaires data. Structural equation model and hierarchical linear model will be used to examine the model. The findings can contribute to the development of dual-level team leadership theory, and can also provide a new view for team leader selection in organizations. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2016,24(11):1677-1689 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01677
|
|
关键词
|
团队
;
团队有效性
;
领导有效性
;
多层次研究
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5852735
|
参考文献 共
100
共5页
|
|
1.
李超平. 变革型领导的结构与测量.
心理学报,2005,37:803-811
|
被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李锋. 双通道变革型团队领导行为与创造力:创造性认同与效能感的中介机制研究.
工业心理分会2013年研讨会,2013
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
宋继文. 变革型领导的中介变量:一个整合的视角.
心理科学进展,2009,17:147-157
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
王泸. 领导团队原型特征与领导有效性:基于社会认同理论的视角.
管理学家,2012(2):173-174
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
谢晔. 团队领导研究的回顾及展望.
科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(7):165-174
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
杨凯. 变革型领导力和交易型领导力:团队绩效的预测指标.
心理学探新,2009,29:82-88
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
于博. “揭开黑箱”——变革型领导中介变量的研究现状与展望.
心理科学进展,2009,17:158-164
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
张莹瑞. 社会认同理论及其发展.
心理科学进展,2006,14:475-480
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
张志学. 组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论.
心理学报,2010,42:10-21
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
张志学. 组织行为学研究的现状:意义与建议.
心理学报,2014,46:265-284
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Allen N J. The 'romance of teams': Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2004,77:439-461
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Antonakis J. Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.
The Leadership Quarterly,2003,14:261-295
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Antonakis J. Looking for validity or testing it? The perils of stepwise regression, extreme-scores analysis, heteroscedasticity, and measurement error.
Personality and Individual Differences,2011,50:409-415
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Ashforth B E. Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions.
Journal of Management,2008,34:325-374
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Avolio B s J.
Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.),2004
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Bass B M. Theory of transformational leadership redux.
The Leadership Quarterly,1995,6:463-478
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Bass B M. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88:207-218
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Bergman M E. Scoring situational judgment tests: Once you get the data, your troubles begin.
International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2006,14:223-235
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Bezrukova K. Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance.
Organization Science,2009,20:35-50
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Bledow R. A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance.
Personnel Psychology,2009,62:229-258
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问