束流型拦砂坝溢流口及其关键参数确定
Experimental investigation on the lateral contraction spillway and its key parameters determination
查看参考文献18篇
|
文摘
|
为进一步优化拦砂坝溢流口体型,确定溢流口几何参数取值,通过物理模拟实验研究了不同拦砂坝溢流口体型条件下泥石流过坝的流态、坝后冲刷深度、消能率变化规律,并根据拦砂坝埋深设计标准与松散体水下临界平衡关系,探讨了溢流口收缩率的合理取值范围,结果表明:采用斜面或者大倾角的反弧型溢流口时,坝后泥石流落点与坝脚的距离近、冲刷深度大,而采用无倾角的反弧型溢流面时,不仅可以在一定程度上减小冲刷深度,而且大大增加了坝后泥石流落点与坝脚的距离;在泥石流规模与溢流面曲率半径相同情况下,适当增大侧向收缩率,有利于增强泥石流体与坝后动床之间的相互作用,提高泥石流通过坝后冲刷坑的消能率;当溢流口收缩率在0.2~0.6之间时,冲刷深度满足设计要求,且泥石流跌落点距坝脚较远,冲刷坑发展不会危及坝体安全。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In order to modify the spillway structure of a check dam and specify the geometry parameters of the spillway, the debris-flow pattern,scour depth,and energy dissipation were discussed under the conditions of different bottom surfaces and lateral contraction ratios based on physical modeling experiments. According to the buried depth design criteria for check-dam foundations and critical equilibrium for nonviscous particles under water,the rational value of the lateral contraction ratio was also discussed. The results indicated that the scour hole with deep scour depth was near the dam foundation when the spillway surface was a plate or curved surface with a large inclined angle. When a curved surface with a horizontal outlet was considered,not only was the scour depth decreased to some extent,but the distance between the plunging point and the dam toe was also enhanced. Generally,upon increasing the lateral contraction ratio,the energy dissipation rate increased due to the stronger interaction between the debris flows and erodible bed downstream if the debris-flow scales and spillway curvature were fixed. When the lateral contraction ratio was in the range 0.2—0.6,the scour depth behind the check dam satisfied the engineering design. Meanwhile,the distance between the plunging point and the dam toe was reasonable. This study can provide some reference points for the design of debris-flow mitigation in the engineering of check dams. |
|
来源
|
水科学进展
,2016,27(5):743-750 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2016.05.012
|
|
关键词
|
束流结构
;
拦砂坝
;
溢流口
;
流态
;
坝后冲刷
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室, 四川, 成都, 610041
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1001-6791 |
|
学科
|
水利工程 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院重点部署项目资助项目
;
国家自然科学基金资助项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5843511
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
|
1.
林雪平. 泥石流拦砂坝溢流口过流能力实验研究.
自然灾害学报,2015,24(1):9-14
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Abedini M. Effectiveness of check dam to control soil erosion in a tropical catchment (The Ulu Kinta Basin).
Catena,2012,97(15):63-70
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Xie T. A new water-sediment separation structure for debris flow defense and its model test.
Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment,2014,73(4):947-958
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
陈晓清. 汶川地震区特大泥石流工程防治新技术探索.
四川大学学报(工程科学版),2013,45(1):14-23
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Piton G. Design of sediment traps with open check dams: II: woody debris.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2016,142(2):1-13
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Bombino G. Check dam influence on vegetation species diversity in mountain torrents of the Mediterranean environment.
Ecohydrology,2014,7(2):678-691
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Horiuchi S. Hydraulic model tests for evaluating sediment control function with grid-type high dam.
Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering,2009,62:37-44
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Cui P. Scale amplification of natural debris flows caused by cascading landslide dam failures.
Geomorphology,2013,182:173-189
|
被引
43
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
陈晓清. 汶川地震区大型泥石流工程防治体系规划方法探索.
水利学报,2013,44(5):586-593
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Pan H L. Study on the ultimate depth of scour pit downstream of debris flow check dam based on the energy method.
Engineering Geology,2013,160:103-109
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
张洛.
Y型宽尾墩体型对阶梯溢流坝-消力池联合消能方式水力特性的影响研究,2013:51-52
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
董艳红. 挑流消能冲刷时间对冲刷深度影响的试验研究.
水资源与水工程学报,2011,22(4):170-172
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
韩海骞. 潮流作用下桥墩局部冲刷深度计算公式的建立与验证.
泥沙研究,2016(1):8-13
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Adduce C. Local scour downstream of grade control structures in urban stream restoration.
Enhancing Urban Environment by Environmental Upgrading and Restoration. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences,2005:307-317
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
张新周. 感潮河段丁坝局部冲刷三维数值模拟.
水科学进展,2012,23(2):222-228
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
谢省宗. 我国高坝泄洪消能新技术的研究和创新.
水利学报,2016,47(3):324-337
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
王虎. 考虑渗流力的海床临界冲刷机理及计算方法.
水科学进展,2013,24(1):115-121
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Pan H L. Local Scour and the Laws of Scour Pit’s Shape Downstream of Debris Flow Sabo Dam.
Journal of Mountain Science,2013,10(6):1063-1073
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问