帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

自我损耗源量表的编制及测评研究生样本的信效度
Development of the Ego Depletion Source Scale and the psychometric evaluation in postgraduates

查看参考文献25篇

文摘 目的:编制自我损耗源量表(EDS-S)并检验其效度和信度。方法:结合文献分析与208名研究生的开放式问卷调查,构建了EDS-S的理论维度,并在此基础上编制初始问卷。选取北京市某高校801名研究生,随机分为两部分,一部分(n=400)用于条目分析与探索性因子分析,另一部分(n=401)用于验证性因子分析与内部一致性检验;以自我调节疲劳量表(SRF-S)为效标检验效标效度;2周后随机选取其中406名被试进行重测以检验重测信度。结果:量表包含48个条目,分为想法抑制、冲动控制、情绪控制、高难度任务、强制性任务、决策、社交困扰、自我呈现、拖延、未完成目标、习惯改变等11个因子,共解释68.45%的方差变异;验证性因子分析结果表明模型拟合良好(χ~2=2517.39,df=1072,χ~2/ df=2.35,RMSEA=0.05,NFI=0.97,NNFI=0.98,CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,GFI=0.83,SRMR=0.05);量表总分及各因子得分均与SRF-S得分呈正相关(r=0.15~0.48,均P<0.001)。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.94,各因子的Cronbach α系数在0.65~0.91之间;总量表的重测信度为0.66,各因子的重测信度为0.41~0.66。结论:本研究编制的自我损耗源量表符合心理测量学要求,可用于我国研究生群体自我损耗源的评估。
其他语种文摘 <ab_a>Objective: To develop the Ego Depletion Source Scale (EDS-S) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: Based on literature analysis and open questionnaire survey in 208 postgraduate students,this study defined the construct of EDS-S,and compiled the preliminary questionnaire. A sample of 801 postgraduates coming from a university in Beijing was investigated with preliminary questionnaire,400 of them were assessed for exploratory factor analysis and 401 of them were assessed for confirmatory factor analysis. The criterion validity was tested with the Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale (SRF-S). Totally 406 students were retested for test-retest reliability with 2 week interval. Results: The EDS-S was composed of 48 items in 11 factors,which were thought suppression, impulse control,emotional control,challenging task,compulsive task,decision making,social distress,self-presentation, procrastination, unfulfilled goals and habits changing. The 11 factors explained 68.45% of the variances. Furthermore,the result of CFA indicated that the model fitted the data with well construct validity (χ~2 = 2517.39,df = 1072,χ~2 /df = 2.35,RMSEA = 0.05,NFI = 0.97,NNFI = 0.98,CFI = 0.98,IFI = 0.98,GFI = 0.83, SRMR = 0.05) and its factors scores were positively correlated with the SFR-S scores (r = 0.15 - 0.48,Ps < 0.001). The Cronbach α coefficients were 0.94 for the total questionnaire and 0.65 - 0.91 for the 11 factors. The test-retest reliability were 0.66 for the total questionnaire and 0.41 - 0.66 for the 11 factors. Conclusion: It suggests that the Ego Depletion Source Scale (EDS-S) is reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measure the depletion risk of postgraduates.
来源 中国心理卫生杂志 ,2016,30(11):851-857 【核心库】
DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2016.11.010
关键词 自我损耗源 ; 自我损耗 ; 效度 ; 信度 ; 心理测量学
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-6729
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  中国科学院心理健康重点实验室经费资助
文献收藏号 CSCD:5843032

参考文献 共 25 共2页

1.  Hare T A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPMC valuation system. Science,2009,324(5927):646-648 被引 43    
2.  Dewall C N. Violence restrained: effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. J Exp Soc Psychol,2007,43(1):62-76 被引 17    
3.  Tangney J P. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers,2004,72(2):271-322 被引 82    
4.  Wills T A. Self-control,symptomatology, and substance use precursors: test of a theoretical model in a community sample of 9-year-old children. Psychol Addic Behav,2007,21(2):205-215 被引 9    
5.  Baumeister R F. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource?. J Pers Soc Psychol,1998,74(5):1252-1265 被引 97    
6.  Hagger M S. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull,2010,136(4):495-525 被引 68    
7.  Muraven M. Self-control as a limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. J Pers Soc Psychol,1998,74(3):774-789 被引 42    
8.  Hofmann W. What people desire, feel conflicted about,and try to resist in everyday life. Psychol Sci,2012,23(6):582-588 被引 2    
9.  Hagger M S. Chronic inhibition,selfcontrol and eating behavior: test of a " resource depletion" model. PLoS One,2013,8(10):e76888 被引 4    
10.  Wagner D D. Self-regulation and its failure: the seven deadly threats to self-regulation. APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Vol 1. Attitudes and social cognition,2015:805-842 被引 1    
11.  Baumeister R F. The strength model of selfcontrol. Curr Direct Psychol Sci,2007,16(6):351-355 被引 89    
12.  程利娜. 研究生心理压力源量表的编制. 中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(1):17-19 被引 7    
13.  马喜亭. 研究生心理健康状况与生活压力调查研究. 中国特殊教育,2011(4):91-96 被引 3    
14.  王利刚. 自我调节疲劳量表中文版测评青年人的效度与信度. 中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(4):290-294 被引 26    
15.  Nes L S. Self-regulatory fatigue in chronic multisymptom illnesses: scale development, fatigue, and self-control. J Pain Res,2012,6(6):181-188 被引 1    
16.  Brown J M. The self-regulation questionnaire. Innovations in clinical practice: A source book. Vol. 17,1999:281-292 被引 1    
17.  Job V. Implicit theories about willpower predict self-regulation and grades in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol,2015,108(4):637-647 被引 5    
18.  Gillebaart M. Effortless self-control: a novel perspective on response conflict strategies in trait self-control. Soc Pers Psychol Compass,2015,9(2):88-99 被引 3    
19.  Lally P. How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol,2010,40(6):998-1009 被引 6    
20.  Wood W. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychol Rev,2007,114(4):843-863 被引 9    
引证文献 4

1 唐义诚 损耗敏感性量表中文版的修订与信效度研究 中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(8):642-647
被引 3

2 王经纬 留学生自我损耗现状及影响因素 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2017,26(10):944-949
被引 1

显示所有4篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号