中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表的初步修订
A Revision of the Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale(APNI) in Chinese Children
查看参考文献19篇
|
文摘
|
目的:修订中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表(The attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale, APNI),并检验其在地震后初中生人群的信效度。方法:用中文版APNI量表、积极/消极情绪量表(Positive Affectand Negative Affect Scale, PANAS)、儿童事件冲击量表(Children’s Revised ImpactofEventScale, CRIES)、创伤后成长量表——儿童修订版(Children’s Revised Positive-traumatic Growth Inventory, PTGI-C)对云南鲁甸地震灾区1199名初中生进行测试。结果:探索性因素分析得出两因素模型,删除载荷小于0.4的11个条目,解释总变异的42.9%。验证性因素分析验证了探索性因素分析的因子结构,拟合度较好(χ~2/df=2.76,CFI=0.95,NFI=0.93,TLI=0.94,GFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.05);所有项目的决断值均显著(P<0.001),各条目与量表总分相关在0.36~0.66之间。APNI量表总分和积极的注意偏向、消极的注意偏向的Cronbach’s α系数依次为0.92、0.92、0.83。积极的注意偏向与积极情绪(r=0.51,P<0.01)、 PTG(r=0.52,P<0.01)呈现显著正相关;消极的注意偏向与消极情绪(r=0.46,P<0.01)、PTSD(r=0.42,P<0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:修订后的中文版APNI量表在地震受灾的初中生群体中具有良好信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: To revise the Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale(APNI) in Chinese subjects after the earthquake. Methods: Take the Chinese version of the Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale(CRIES), the Revised Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children(PTG-C), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS) to make a survey among 1199 middle-school students from Ludian quake affected area. Results: According to the results of exploratory factor analysis,we deleted ten entry of the primary model and it was confirmed in the confirmatory analysis. The fit indices were χ~2/df =2.76, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.93, TLI=0.94, GFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.05. The critical ratios of all the items were significant(P <0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.36 to 0.66. The Cronbach’s α of the total scale, positive attentional bias and negative attentional bias subscale were 0.92, 0.92, 0.83 respectively. Positive attentional bias showed a significant positive correlation with positive affect(r =0.51,P <0.01) and PTG(r =0.52,P <0.01), and negative attentional bias showed a significant positive correlation with negative affect(r =0.46,P <0.01) and PTSD(r =0.42,P < 0.01). Conclusion: The Chinese Revision of Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale has good reliability and validity, hence they are suitable for measurement in Chinese. |
|
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2016,24(5):861-864 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.05.021
|
|
关键词
|
创伤后应激反应
;
信度
;
效度
;
注意偏向
;
积极/消极注意偏向量表
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
中国心理学会学会能力专项
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5841082
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
|
1.
Bar-Haim Y. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study.
Psychological Bulletin,2007,133(1):1-24
|
被引
59
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Noguchi K. Cognitive tendencies of focusing on positive and negative information.
Journal of Research in Personality,2006,40(6):891-910
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Segerstrom S C. A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: what's on your mind, and how, and how much?.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,85(5):909
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Rusting C L. Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: three conceptual frameworks.
Psychological Bulletin,1998,124(2):165
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Chan M W. The valence of attentional bias and cancer-related rumination in posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among women with breast cancer.
Psychooncology,2011,20(5):544-552
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
黄丽. 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究.
中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(1):54-56
|
被引
155
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
汪智艳. 修订版儿童事件影响量表在地震灾区初中学生中的信效度.
中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24(6):463-466
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Kilmer R P. Use of the revised Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children.
J Trauma Stress,2009,22(3):248-253
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Cryder C H. An exploratory study of posttraumatic growth in children following a natural disaster.
Am J Orthopsychiatry,2006,76(1):65-69
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ho S M. The relationship between explanatory style and posttraumatic growth after bereavement in a non-clinical sample.
Death Stud,2008,32(5):461-478
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Ehlers A. A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.
Behaviour Research and Therapy,2000,38(4):319-345
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Bryant R A. Maladaptive self-appraisals before trauma exposure predict posttraumatic stress disorder.
J Consult Clin Psychol,2007,75(5):812-815
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Cann A. Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the Event Related Rumination Inventory.
Anxiety Stress Coping,2011,24(2):137-156
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
苟娜.
PTSD初中生注意偏向的实验研究,2009
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
王婷.
震后受灾老年人对恐惧刺激的注意偏向特点,2012
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Mathews A. Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety.
Cognition & Emotion,2002,16(3):331-354
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Elsesser K. Initial symptoms and reactions to trauma-related stimuli and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder.
Depression and Anxiety,2005,21(2):61-70
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Ho S M. Relationships between explanatory style, posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among Chinese breast cancer patients.
Psychol Health,2011,26(3):269-285
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
董超群.
自我表露对意外创伤者创伤后成长的干预效果及作用机制研究,2013
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问