四川省山丘区不同生计策略类型农户生计资本结构特征及差异研究
Research on the Structural Features and Differences of Farmers' Livelihood Capital under Different Livelihood Strategies in the Mountainous and Upland Areas of Sichuan Province,China
查看参考文献21篇
|
文摘
|
利用四川省山丘区农户调研数据,借鉴英国国际发展署可持续生计分析框架,实证分析了农户生计策略类型及其特征,不同生计策略类型下农户生计资本结构特征及其差异,研究表明:①农户生计策略类型按收入来源和多少可分为兼业型、农业型、多样化经营型和供养型4类;②4种生计策略类型农户生计资产结构呈现出从供养型农户到农业型、兼业型和多样化经营型农户逐层递增外扩的趋势;③就物质资本、金融资本和社会资本而言,多样化经营型农户与其它3类农户差异有统计学意义,而农业型和供养型农户差异无统计学意义;就人力资本而言,多样化经营型和兼业型农户差异无统计学意义,但与农业型和供养型农户差异有统计学意义,而后两者差异无统计学意义;就自然资本而言,仅农业型农户与供养型农户差异有统计学意义,其余各类型农户差异无统计学意义. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
A number of studies examine the relationship between famers'livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies both at home and abroad.However,we know much less about the structural features and differences of famers'livelihood capitals under different livelihood strategies.Besides,most of the quantitative studies on livelihoods have adopted subjective value assignment method with few of them classified as pure quantitative researches.Using a sustainable livelihoods approach and survey data from farmers in mountainous and upland areas of Sichuan province,this study has conducted empirical analysis on the livelihood strategies and features for famers as well as the structural features and differences for the livelihood capitals under different types of livelihood strategies.The results show that:① According to sources and amount of the family income,famers'livelihood strategies can be divided into four categories,which are pluriactive type,agricultural type,diversified business type and supporting type;②structures of farmers' livelihood capitals under above four livelihood strategies have demonstrated an incremental and extending trend from supporting type farmers to agricultural type,pluriactive type and diversified business type;③ looking at physical capital,financial capital and social capital alone,there are significant differences between farmers of diversified-business type and farmers of the other three types,whereas there is no significant difference between agricultural type farmers and supporting type farmers;with regard to human capital, while farmers of diversified business type are not significantly different from pluriactive type,they are remarkably different from agricultural type and supporting type.But no distinct differences are laying between the latter two;in terms of natural capital,agricultural type farmers are distinctly different from supporting type farmers,while there are no significant differences among the rest types of farmers. |
|
来源
|
西南大学学报. 自然科学版
,2016,38(10):125-131 【扩展库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2016.10.018
|
|
关键词
|
农户生计
;
生计策略
;
生计资本
;
生计资本结构
;
生计资本差异
;
四川省
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都, 610041
2.
江西农业大学新农村发展研究院, 南昌, 330045
3.
乐山师范学院旅游学院, 四川, 乐山, 614004
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1673-9868 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5839748
|
参考文献 共
21
共2页
|
|
1.
Xu Dingde. Influential Factors in Employment Location Selection Based on "Push-Pull" Migration Theory-A Case Study in Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China.
Journal of Mountain Science,2015,12(6):1562-1581
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
国家统计局.
2013年农民工监测调查报告,2014
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
李聪.
微观视角下劳动力外出务工与农户生计可持续发展,2014
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Deshingkar P. Internal Migration,Poverty and Development in Asia:Including the Excluded Through Partnerships and Improved Governance.
IDS Bulletin,2006,37(3):88-100
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Brown R. Migrants'Remittances,Savings and Investment in the South Pacific.
International Labour Review,1994,133(3):347-367
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
李强. 农民工汇款的决策,数量和用途分析.
中国农村观察,2008,29(3):2-12
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
李树茁. 外出务工汇款对西部贫困山区农户家庭支出的影响.
西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011,31(1):33-39
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Liu Shaoquan. Influences on Rural Migrant Workers'Selection of Employment Location in the Mountainous and Upland Areas of Sichuan,China.
Journal of Rural Studies,2014,33(1):71-81
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Xu Dingde. Household Livelihood Strategies and Dependence on Agriculture in the Mountainous Settlements in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area,China.
Sustainability,2015,7(5):4850-4869
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ansoms A N. A Quantitative Analysis of Poverty and Livelihood Profiles:The Case of Rural Rwanda.
Food Policy,2010,35(6):584-598
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
刘恩来. 基于农户生计策略选择影响因素的生计资本度量-以四川省402户农户为例.
西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,40(12):59-65
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
徐定德. 西南典型山区农户生计资本与生计策略关系研究.
西南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,37(9):118-126
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Sharp K.
Measuring Destitution:Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in the Analysis of Survey Data. IDS Working Paper,2003
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
李小云. 农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用.
中国农村经济,2007,23(4):32-39
|
被引
113
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
蔡志海. 汶川地震灾区贫困村农户生计资本分析.
中国农村经济,2012,28(12):55-67
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
谢芳婷. 基于退耕还林政策的农户生计变化及其影响因素.
贵州农业科学,2015,43(4):220-226
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
苏芳. 生计资本与生计策略关系研究——以张掖市甘州区为例.
中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(6):119-125
|
被引
77
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Bhandari P B. Rural Livelihood Change?Household Capital,Community Resources and Livelihood Transition.
Journal of Rural Studies,2013,32(4):126-136
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Soltania A. Analysis Poverty,Sustainabity and Household Livelihood Strategies in Zagros, Iran.
Ecological Economics,2012,79(4):60-70
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
崔诗雨. 三峡库区就地后靠移民与原住民生计资本特征及差异分析-以重庆市万州区为例.
西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,41(8):80-86
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问