21世纪初中国土地利用强度的空间分布格局
Spatial pattern of land use intensity in China in 2000
查看参考文献56篇
|
文摘
|
土地利用强度直接反映了人类活动对自然生态系统的影响程度,成为全球环境变化的重要驱动力,也是土地利用可持续程度的重要测度指标。当前土地科学研究主要关注土地覆被变化及其对生态环境的影响,而土地利用强度的高分辨率时空表达尚在探索阶段。本文基于土地利用栅格成分数据、遥感数据、社会经济数据等空间化指标要素,根据地表被人类活动干扰程度及其可逆性分为人工地类、半人工地类、半天然地类、天然地类4个一级类型;依据耕作强度、人口密度等人类活动强度指标分为22个二级类型,获得空间分辨率为1 km的中国土地利用强度图。21世纪初全国人工地类、半人工地类、半天然地类和天然地类的面积比例分别为0.71%、19.96%、58.93%和21%,人口分布密集的东南部土地利用强度类型多样,且整体高于人口稀疏的西北部;随着经度的增加,土地利用强度类型由以天然地类和半天然地类为主转变为半天然地类和半人工地类为主;东部省市区土地利用强度高于中、西部,西部省市区土地利用强度最低;土地利用强度类型呈区域性集聚分布。与已有研究相比,该研究有效刻画了中国土地利用强度的空间异质性,有助于深入理解人类与自然生态系统的交互格局及其生态环境效应,为可持续土地利用政策的制定提供科学依据。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In this paper, according to the intensity of human impacts, a national hierarchical land use intensity classification system was designed based on comprehensive and high-resolution spatial datasets. According to the degree and reversibility of surface disturbance by human activities, we obtained data for four main groups of artificial land,semi-artificial land, semi- natural land and natural land, which were further divided into 22 classes based on indicators such as human population density, and cropping intensity. Land use intensity in China with a 1-km spatial resolution was obtained. The area proportions of artificial land, semiartificial land, semi- natural land and natural land were 0.71%, 19.36%, 58.93% and 21%, respectively. Besides, significant spatial variability was demonstrated at national, regional and provincial levels. The southeastern region with denser population had more classes of land use intensity and was more intensive than the northwestern region with sparse population. With the increase of longitude, a transition in dominated land use intensity type was detected from natural and semi-natural land to semi-natural and semi-artificial land. The land use intensity in provinces of eastern China was the highest, followed by those in central and western regions. The land use intensity types showed a remarkable spatial differentiation of clustered distribution. Compared with the previous studies, our research effectively characterizes the spatial heterogeneity of land use intensity, which can help us to get a better understanding of spatial pattern of human- environment interactions and its eco- environmental impacts, which can provide scientific basis for sustainable land use policies. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2016,71(7):1130-1143 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201607004
|
|
关键词
|
土地利用强度
;
分类系统
;
空间分异
;
可持续性
;
中国
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
美国俄克拉荷马大学微生物与植物生物系空间分析中心, 俄克拉荷马, 诺曼, 73019
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
;
中国科学院科技服务网络计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5756314
|
参考文献 共
56
共3页
|
|
1.
Bluthgen N. A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: Integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization.
Basic and Applied Ecology,2012,13(3):207-220
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Laliberte E. Land use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities.
Ecology Letters,2010,13(1):76-86
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Verburg P H. Land system science: Between global challenges and local realities.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013,5(5):433-437
|
被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Erb K. Conceptual and empirical approaches to mapping and quantifying land-use intensity.
Ester Boserup's Legacy on Sustainability,2014:61-86
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Lambin E F. Are agricultural land- use models able to predict changes in land- use intensity?.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2000,82(1/3):321-331
|
被引
77
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Lambin E F. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths.
Global Environmental Change,2001,11(4):261-269
|
被引
210
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Allan E. Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2014,111(1):308-313
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Verburg P H. Land system change and food security: Towards multi- scale land system solutions.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013,5(5):494-502
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Sala O E. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.
Science,2000,287(5459):1770-1774
|
被引
301
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
FAOSTAT (Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Databas.
FAOSTAT, FAO Statistical Databases: Agriculture, Fisheries, Forestry, Nutrition,2011
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Burney J A. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification.
Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(26):12052-12057
|
被引
46
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Green R E. Farming and the fate of wild nature.
Science,2005,307(5709):550-555
|
被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
戴彦德. 重塑能源实现可持续发展.
中国科学院院刊,2013(2):239-246
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Foley J A. Solutions for a cultivated planet.
Nature,2011,478:337-342
|
被引
185
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Kuemmerle T. Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013,5(5):1-10
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Verburg P H. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization.
Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(3):1327-1335
|
被引
96
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Ellis E C. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes,1700 to 2000.
Global Ecology and Biogeography,2010,19(5):589-606
|
被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Asselen V S. A land system representation for global assessments and land-use modeling.
Global Change Biology,2012,18(10):3125-3148
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Jiang L. The impact of urban expansion on agricultural land use intensity in China.
Land Use Policy,2013,35:33-39
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Boserup E.
The Conditions of Agricultural Growth,1965:108
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问