补偿标准参照的比较:机会成本与环境收益———以石羊河流域生态补偿为例
The Comparison of the Opportunity Cost and Environmental Benefits for Ecological Compensation Standards:a case study in the Shiyanghe River Basin
查看参考文献14篇
|
文摘
|
流域生态补偿是当前生态经济研究的热点问题。在简要说明流域内生态系统服务与流域生态补偿的关系之后,从理论上分析了流域生态补偿标准的环境收益参照———机会成本变为环境收益,并以石羊河流域生态恢复目标为例开展实证,在考虑补偿总预算约束下,比较采用两种补偿标准参照生态补偿机制运行的效果。结果表明:采用环境收益代替机会成本作为补偿标准参照,对于提高农户参与生态补偿的积极性、保护生态系统服务行为的约束性作用明显;引入以机会成本与环境收益比值确定的优先补偿指标,在生态补偿资金预算约束下替代机制对完成既定生态恢复目标有显著促进作用。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Ecological compensation is the current hot issue of ecological economics research.Based on the brief description of the relationship between watershed ecosystem services and ecological compensation,this paper analyzes the reference of watershed environmental benefits of the ecological compensation standard, just transform of the opportunity cost into environmental benefits.Taking ecological restoration goals in the Shiyanghe River Basin as an example to carry out empirical analysis,in considering the compensation of the total budget constraints,we compare the effect of two different compensation standards for ecological compensation mechanism.The result shows that using the environmental benefits instead of the opportunity cost as the compensation standards has obvious effort in improving the enthusiasm of farmer participation in ecological and binding of the act of protecting ecosystem service.The introduction of the priorities compensation indicator that identified by the ratio of opportunity cost and environmental benefits has significant promotion effort to achieve ecological restoration goals at an alternative mechanisms which has ecological compensation capital budget constraint. |
|
来源
|
中国沙漠
,2016,36(3):830-835 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00062
|
|
关键词
|
优先补偿
;
机会成本
;
环境收益
;
替代机制
;
石羊河流域
|
|
地址
|
1.
兰州财经大学, 甘肃, 兰州, 730000
2.
中国科学院成都文献情报中心, 四川, 成都, 610000
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-694X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5743647
|
参考文献 共
14
共1页
|
|
1.
李博. 石羊河流域生态系统服务价值的空间异质性及其计量.
中国沙漠,2013,33(3):943-951
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Pagiola S.
Introduction to Payments for Environmental Services,2005
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
尚海洋. 生态补偿的研究进展及其启示.
冰川冻土,2011,33(6):1435-1443
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
刘力. 流域生态补偿研究进展.
中国沙漠,2015,35(3):808-813
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
马兵. 基于意愿价值评估法的禁牧政策生态补偿定量分析——以宁夏盐池县为例.
中国沙漠,2015,35(3):800-807
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Fernandez S.
Payments for Environmental Services(PES)and Water:Some Opportunities to Help Farmers?,2008
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
张学斌. 基于生态系统服务价值变化的生态经济协调发展研究——以石羊河流域为例.
中国沙漠,2014,34(1):268-274
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
World Bank.
Payments for Ecological Services
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Alix-Garcia J. Payment for environmental services in agricultural landscapes.
Natural Resource Management and Policy,2009,31:163-188
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Antle J M. Modeling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture:a minimum data approach.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2006,50(1):12-15
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Dupaz P. The environmental supply of farm households:a flexible willingness to accept model.
Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,25(2):171-189
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Wu J. Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2000,82(4):979-992
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
郭承录. 石羊河流域生态系统存在的问题及治理对策.
中国沙漠,2010,30(3):608-613
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
徐中民.
甘肃省典型地区生态补偿机制研究,2011
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问