儿童自我控制与父母教养方式的关系
The relationship between children’ s self-control and parenting style
查看参考文献29篇
文摘
|
目的考察父母教养方式与儿童自我控制发展的关系。方法采用分层整群抽样,选取五个省份共1 531名3~11岁儿童,使用自我控制双系统量表和父母教养方式量表进行调查,并对数据进行了共同方法偏差检验。结果(1)各变量间不存在共同方法偏差;(2)男孩在自控系统上得分[(31.66±5.95)分]低于女孩[(32.91±5.49)分],而在冲动系统得分[(43.19±8.32)分]高于女孩[(41.96±8.32)分],均差异有统计学意义(t= 4.071, P<0.01; t= 2.226, P=0.027) ; (3)儿童在控制系统上的得分与父母教养方式的溺爱、冷漠、专制和不一致得分的负相关具有统计学意义(r=-0.054~-0.174,P<0.05),与父母教养方式的民主得分的正相关具有统计学意义(r= 0.231,r= 0.243, P< 0.05);儿童在冲动系统上的得分与父母教养方式的溺爱、冷漠、专制和不一致得分的正相关具有统计学意义(r= 0.116-0.195,P<0.05),与父母教养方式的民主得分的负相关具有统计学意义(r= -0.107, r=-0.108, P<0.05) ;(4)在控制了儿童性别和年龄两个变量后,父亲民主(β= 0.120)、父亲不一致(β-0.159)、母亲民主(β-0.188)与儿童自控系统的关系具有统计学意义(R_(adj)~2= 0.107,P< 0.05);父亲专制(β= 0.070)、父亲不一致(β=0.136)、母亲民主(β=-0.063)、母亲专制(β=0.099)、母亲不一致(β=0.061)与儿童冲动系统的关系具有统计学意义(R_(adj)~2 = 0.082,P<0.05)。结论父母教养方式与儿童的自我控制具有密切关系,父亲与母亲教养方式各维度对儿童自我控制双系统的影响作用具有特异性。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To study the effect of parenting styles on the children' s self-control,and distinguish the influence between father and mother. Methods The present study selected 1 531 children (766 girls ) between 3-10 years old. Data on parenting style were collected by parenting style questionnaire, while data on children ' s self-control were measured by dual-system of self-control scale. Principal component analysis was conducted to examine common method bias. Results (1) No common method bias was found in this study. (2) Boys scored (31.66±5.95) on control system lower than girls (32.91±5.49),t= 4.071, P< 0.01,but they had higher scores (43.19±8.32) on impulsive system than girls (41.96±8.32),t= 2.226, P-0.027. (3) The associations of children's self-control scores with parents' spoiling, neglectful, authoritarian, inconsistent style were significant ( r=-0.054~-0.174, P<0.05) , while it correlated positively with parents' democratic style ( r= 0.231,r= 0.243,P<0.05) ? The correlation between children' s impulsive system scores and parents' spoiling, neglectful, authoritarian, inconsistent style were significantly positive ( r= 0. 116-0.195, P<0.05) , while its associations with parents' democratic style were significant ( r=-0.107,r= -0.108, P<0.05). (4) As controlling children' s age and sex,father democracy ( β= 0.120) , inconsistency(β=-0.159),and mother democracy ( β= 0.188) were significantly correlated with children' s self-control(R_(adj)~2 = 0.107, P<0.05). Father despotism ( β= 0.070) , inconsistency ( β= 0.136) , mother ' s democracy(β=-0.063) ,despotism ( β=0.099) and inconsistency (β=0.061) significantly predicted children' s impulsive system ( R_(adj)~2 = 0.082, P<0.05). Conclusion Each dimension of self-control and parenting style is high correlation.Father and mother' s different rearing traits and the combination of different rearing traits contributed variously to children ' s self-control system. |
来源
|
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
,2016,25(6):542-546 【扩展库】
|
DOI
|
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2016.06.014
|
关键词
|
自我控制双系统
;
冲动系统
;
自控系统
;
父母教养方式
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1674-6554 |
学科
|
医药、卫生 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
中国科学院心理健康重点实验室经费资助
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5743294
|
参考文献 共
29
共2页
|
1.
宋辉. 儿童自我控制发展研究综述.
辽宁师范大学学报,1999,22(6):35-38
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
2.
王利刚. 儿童青少年自我控制发展的研究现状.
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2014,23(10):953-955
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Areepattamannil S. Parenting practices,parenting style,and children's school achievement.
Psychol Stud,2010,55(4):283-289
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Darling N. Parenting style as context: an integrative model.
Psychol Bull,1993,113(3):487
|
被引
40
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Eisenberg N. Relations of parenting style to Chinese children's effortful control, ego resilience, and maladjustment.
Dev Psychopathol,2009,21(2):455-477
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
6.
邹萍. 父母教育观念类型对幼儿个性相关特质发展的影响.
心理与行为研究,2005,3(3):182-187
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
7.
陈会昌. 父亲教养态度与儿童在4~7岁间的问题行为和学校适应.
心理科学,2004,27(5):1041-1045
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
8.
陶沙. 3-6岁儿童母亲的教育方式及影响因素的研究.
心理发展与教育,1994,10(3):40-47
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Kiff C J. Nature and nurturing:parenting in the context of child temperament.
Clin Child. Fam Psychol Rev,2011,14(3):251-301
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Rinaldi C M. Mothers' and fathers' parenting styles and associations with toddlers' externalizing, internalizing, and adaptive behaviors.
Early Child Res Q,2012,27(2):266-273
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
11.
王利刚. 儿童自我控制双系统量表的编制与信效度分析.
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2014,23(4):362-365
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
12.
杨丽珠. 幼儿气质与母亲教养方式的选择.
心理科学,1998,21(1):43-46
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Baillargeon R H. Gender differences in physical aggression : a prospective population-based survey of children before and after 2 years of age.
Dev Psychol,2007,43(1):13-26
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Else-Quest N M. Gender differences in temperament : a meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull,2006,132(1):33-72
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Olson S L. Inhibitory control and harsh discipline as predictors of externalizing problems in young children: a comparative study of U. S., Chinese, and Japanese pre-schoolers.
J Abnorm Child Psychol,2011,39(8):1163-1175
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Vazsonyi A T. Where self-control comes from : on the development of self-control and its relationship to deviance over time.
Dev Psychol,2010,46(1):245-257
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Raffaelli M. Developmental stability and change in self-regulation from childhood to adolescence.
J Genet Psychol,2005,166(1):54-75
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Quinn P D. Differential changes in impulsivity and sensation seeking and the escalation of substance use from adolescence to early adulthood.
Dev Psychopathol,2013,25(1):223-239
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Steinberg L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking.
Dev Rev,2008,28(1):78-106
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
20.
衣明纪. 儿童抽动障碍的诊断与评估.
中华诊断学电子杂志,2013,1(1):25-31
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|