帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

施氮方式及测定方法对紫色土夏玉米氨挥发的影响
Effects of different fertilization and measurement methods on ammonia volatilization of summer maize in purple soil

查看参考文献31篇

张翀 1   李雪倩 1   苏芳 1   朱波 2   巨晓棠 1 *  
文摘 以川中丘陵区紫色土为对象,研究了撒施尿素添加脲酶抑制剂及尿素深施对夏玉米季氨挥发的减排效果,为合理施肥和减少农田氨排放提供依据;同时,对比风洞法和密闭室连续抽气法测定氨挥发的结果,为准确定量农田氨挥发提供方法依据。设置5个施氮方式处理,分别为:不施氮(CK);农民传统施氮———雨后撒施尿素(BC);撒施添加有Limus(德国BASF公司新开发的脲酶抑制剂)的尿素(BC+Limus);尿素一次性条施(Band1);尿素分两次条施(Band2)。除不施氮处理外,其他处理施氮量均为150 kg?hm~(-2),各处理采用密闭室连续抽气法测定氨挥发。另外,选取农民传统施氮处理用风洞法测定氨挥发,以研究不同测定方法对氨挥发损失量的影响。结果表明:紫色土夏玉米季农民传统的施氮方式氨挥发损失率可高于40%,而处理BC+Limus、Band1、Band2的氨挥发损失率分别为4.8%、3.8%、1.3%,分别比处理BC减少了90%、92%和97%的氨挥发损失,均具有很好的减排效果。密闭室连续抽气法测定氨挥发量稍高于风洞法,氨挥发损失率分别为48.4%和41.9%,但差异不显著。
其他语种文摘 Soil properties, local climatic conditions and fertilization method in purple soil regions may significantly affect ammonia volatilization(AV). In this study, the effects of different fertilization methods on AV from purple soil were investigated during summer maize growth in middle Sichuan Province. Two different AV measurement methods(i.e., wind tunnel method and continuous airflow enclosure method)were compared to better quantify ammonia emissions from croplands. Five fertilization methods with three replicates were used in the experiment included CK(no nitrogen fertilizer), BC(broadcast urea, which is the local conventional practice), BC+Limus [broadcast urea amended with urease inhibitor Limus(a new urease inhibitor developed by BASF)], Band1(band urea once), Band2(band urea twice). The AV in all the treatments was determined by enclosure method. For BC treatments, AV was monitored by a wind tunnel system simultaneously. Results showed that AV loss rates were greater than 40% in BC, but only 4.8%, 3.8% and 1.3% in BC+Limus, Band1 and Band2, respectively, a reduction of 90%, 92%, and 97% as compared with BC. Ammonia loss rate(48.4%)measured by continuous airflow enclosure method was slightly higher than that by wind tunnel method(41.9%), but no significant difference between them was found.
来源 农业环境科学学报 ,2016,35(6):1194-1201 【核心库】
DOI 10.11654/jaes.2016.06.024
关键词 氨挥发 ; 施氮方式 ; 测定方法 ; 紫色土 ; 夏玉米 ; 氨减排
地址

1. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京, 100193  

2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都, 610041

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1672-2043
学科 农业基础科学
基金 国家973计划
文献收藏号 CSCD:5727091

参考文献 共 31 共2页

1.  蔡祖聪. 立足于解决高投入条件下的氮污染问题. 植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(1):1-6 被引 60    
2.  Ni K. Ammonia volatilization after application of urea to winter wheat over 3 years affected by novel urease and nitrification inhibitors. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2014,197:184-194 被引 7    
3.  Sommer S G. Ammonia emission from mineral fertilizers and fertilized crops. Advances in Agronomy,2004,82:557-622 被引 26    
4.  Rochette P. Reducing ammonia volatilization in a no-till soil by incorporating urea and pig slurry in shallow bands. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2008,84(1):71-80 被引 6    
5.  Hunter F W. Agronomic evaluation of coated urea to reduce ammonia volatilization from side-dress applica tions to corn. Crop Management,2013,12(1) 被引 1    
6.  Gu B J. Agricultural ammonia emissions contribute to China's urban air pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2014,12(5):265-266 被引 11    
7.  Stokstad E. Ammonia pollution from farming may exact hefty health costs. Science,2014,343(6168):238-238 被引 8    
8.  Rochette P. Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen retention:How deep to incorporate urea?. Journal of Environmental Quality,2013,42(6):1635-1642 被引 34    
9.  Ferguson R B. Effects of soil drying on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1986,50(2):485-490 被引 8    
10.  Holcomb J C. Effect of irrigation rate on ammonia volatilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2011,75(6):2341-2347 被引 13    
11.  苏芳. 不同氮肥形态的氨挥发损失比较. 土壤,2006,38(6):682-686 被引 29    
12.  卢艳艳. 不同包膜控释尿素对农田土壤氨挥发的影响. 生态学报,2011,31(23):7133-7140 被引 19    
13.  李欠欠. 脲酶抑制剂LIMUS对我国农田氨减排及作物产量和氮素利用的影响,2014 被引 8    
14.  Li Q Q. Effect of a new urease inhibitor on ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization in wheat in north and northwest China. Field Crops Research,2015,175:96-105 被引 15    
15.  王朝辉. 田间土壤氮挥发的原位测定-通气法. 植物营养与肥料学报,2002,8(2):205-209 被引 191    
16.  李欠欠. 传统和优化施氮对春玉米产量、氨挥发及氮平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(3):571-579 被引 28    
17.  Shah S B. Measuring ammonia concentra tions and emissions from agricultural land and liquid surfaces:A review. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association,2006,56(7):945-960 被引 3    
18.  Roelcke M. In situ comparisons of ammonia volatilization from N fertilizers in Chinese loess soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2002,62(1):73-88 被引 13    
19.  田玉华. 太湖地区氮磷肥施用对稻田氨挥发的影响. 土壤学报,2007,44(5):893-900 被引 48    
20.  山楠. 不同施氮水平下小麦田氨挥发规律研究. 农业环境科学学报,2014,33(9):1858-1865 被引 28    
引证文献 18

1 李祯 不同水氮运筹模式对田间土壤氨挥发及春玉米籽粒产量的影响 农业环境科学学报,2017,36(4):799-807
被引 12

2 万伟帆 氮肥用量和脲酶抑制剂对滴灌马铃薯田氧化亚氮排放和氨挥发的影响 植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(3):693-702
被引 18

显示所有18篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号