中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验
Reliability and Validity of the Individual Authenticity Measure at Work for Chinese Employees
查看参考文献19篇
|
文摘
|
目的:检验员工真实性量表(Individual authenticity measure at work.IAM Work)在中国企业员工中应用的信度和效度。方法:用IAM Work中文版对657名企业员工进行测试,在样本中随机抽取214名员工同时施测IAM Work中文版、Utrecht工作投入量表简版(UWES-9)、建言行为量表和中国企业员工工作幸福感量表,并在两个月后重测。结果:验证性因素分析验证了员工真实性的三因素模型。各拟合指标分别为X~2/df=2.61,NFI=0.94,CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05。简版量表为X~2/df=2.99,NFI=0.97, CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98, GFI=0.96, AG-FI=0.94,RMSEA=0.06。所有项目的决断值均显著(P<0.001),项目与量表总分的相关在0.46~0.77之间。IAM Work中文版量表和真实的生活、自我异化、接受外部影响的Cronbach 's a系数依次为0.92、0.90、0.93、0.91。简版量表的Cronbach's a系数依次为0.89、0.83、0.92、0.92。IAM Work量表两个月后的重测信度为0.79,简版为0.78。IAM Work中文版总分、简版总分与工作幸福感(r=0.67,0.58,P<0.01)、工作投入(r=0.50,0.43,P<0.01)与建言行为(r=0.34, 0.23,P<0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:IAM Work中文版量表和简版量表具有良好的信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Individual Authenticity Measure at Work(IAM Work). Methods: The reliability and validity of the IAM Work was tested using a sample size of 657 employees. To evaluate the validity of the IAM Work, 214 employees were randomly selected to test with the IAM Work, UWES-9, Voice Behavior Scale, and the Employee Occupational Well-being in Chinese Enterprises Scale. These employees were re-tested two months later. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure model. The fitted indices are X~2/df=2.61, NFI=0.94, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, GFI=0.93, AGFI=0.91, RMSEA=0.05, and the fitted indices for the short version are X~2/df=2.99, NFI=0.97, CFI=0.98, IFI=0.98, GFI=0.96, AGFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.06. The critical ratios of all the items were statistically significant(P<0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.46 to 0.77. The Cronbach' s a coefficients of the total scale, authentic living, self-alienation, and accepting external influence subscale were 0.92,0.90, 0.93 and 0.91 respectively. The Cronbach' s a coefficients for the short version are 0.89, 0.83, 0.92 and 0.92 respectively. The test-retest reliability after 2 months is 0.79 for the full scale and 0.78 for the short version. The total scores of both the Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version showed significant positive correlations with occupational well-being(r=0.67, 0.58, P<0.01), work engagement(r=0.50, 0.43, P<0.01), and the Voice Behavior Scale total score(r=0.34, 0.23,P<0.01). Conclusion: Both Chinese version of IAM Work and the short version are reliable, valid, and suitable for measuring the authenticity of Chinese employees. |
|
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2016,24(3):454-458 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.03.016
|
|
关键词
|
员工真实性
;
员工真实性量表(IAM Work)
;
信度
;
效度
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
中科院心理所创新项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5723535
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
|
1.
Kernis M H. Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem.
Psychological Inquiry,2003,14(1):1-26
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Seligman M E. Positive psychology: An introduction.
American Psychologist,2000,55(1):5-14
|
被引
95
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
van den Bosch R. Authenticity at work: Development and validation of an individual authenticity measure at work.
Journal of Happiness Studies,2014,15(1):1-18
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
van den Bosch R. The authentic worker' s well-being and performance: The relationship between authenticity at work, well-being, and work outcomes.
Journal of Psychology,2014,148(6):659-681
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Knoll M. Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive voice, and the moderating effect of organizational identification.
Journal of Positive Psychology,2013,8(4):346-360
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Kernis M H. A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2006,38:283-357
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Wood A M. The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale.
Journal of Counseling Psychology,2008,55(3):385-399
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Lopez F G. Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity.
Journal of Counseling Psychology,2006,53(3):362-371
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Walumbwa F O. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure.
Journal of Management,2008,34(1):89-126
|
被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
王震. 真实型领导：概念、测量、形成与作用.
心理科学进展,2014,22(3):458-473
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
张珊珊. 领导-团队投入匹配对团队绩效的影响: 团队满意度氛围的作用.
心理科学,2014,37(1):140-145
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
段锦云. 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响.
心理学报,2011,43(10):1185-1197
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
黄亮. 中国企业员工工作幸福感的维度结构研究.
中央财经大学学报,2014,10:84-112
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hair J F.
Multivariate data analysis,2010
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Pavlou P A. Understanding and mitigati-nguncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective.
MIS Quarterly,2007,31(1):105-136
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Suh E M. Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2002,83(6):1378-1391
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
English T. Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007,93(3):478-490
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Robinson O C. Authenticity, social context, and well-being in the United States, England, and Russia: A three country comparative analysis.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2013,44(5):719-737
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Church A T. Relating self-concept consistency to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in eight cultures.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2014,45(5):695-712
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问