紫色土水分特征曲线室内测定方法的对比
Comparison of laboratory methods for determining water retention curves in purple soil
查看参考文献22篇
|
文摘
|
为探寻全吸力范围内土壤水分特征曲线的可靠测定方法,采用沙箱排水法、Hyprop仪蒸发法、压力膜仪排水法和露点水势仪蒸发法分吸力段测定盐亭紫色土耕地表层2 ~ 7 cm和亚表层7 ~ 12 cm土壤的水分特征曲线,对比测定结果的方法间差异,并分析其原因。结果表明: 对于表层和亚表层土壤,低吸力段(h > -100 cm)水分特征曲线的沙箱法和Hyprop仪法的均方根误差E_(RMS)(θ)均较小,在0.026 ~ 0.082 cm~3 /cm~3范围内,确定系数R~2均大于0.962,说明这两种方法测定结果之间差异不大。高吸力段(h < -330 cm)的压力膜仪法与露点仪法测定结果之间的差异较大,E_(RMS)(θ)为0.062 ~ 0.097 cm~3 /cm~3,R~2较低,为0.775 ~ 0.952。因此,全吸力范围内水分特征曲线测定方法的选择与组合应考虑土壤孔径分布特征和研究目的。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Four laboratory methods,namely,the sand box,the HYPROP system,pressure plates and the dewpoint potential meter,were used to determine soil water retention curves (SWRC) for samples of farmland purple soil. SWRC were determined over the whole entire moisture range for samples obtained from two horizons (i. e.,2—7 cm, 7—12cm). Measured data was compared to identify the most reliable method. The root-mean-square errors of the soil water content (E_(RMS)(θ)),established under low suctions (h > -100 cm),the sand box and HYPROP system were small (0.026—0.082 cm~3 /cm~3) with the coefficient of determination (R~2) between measured water retention curves by the two methods being greater than 0.962. Contrastingly,the E_(RMS)(θ) of soil water content,established under high suctions (h < -330 cm),using pressure plates and the dewpoint potential meter were larger (0.062—0.097 cm~3 /cm~3),with lower R2 values (0.775—0.952). In conclusion,the selection and combined use of appropriate methods for SWRC determination,over the entire soil moisture range,should be decided upon according to the soil's pore size distribution and the application objective. |
|
来源
|
水科学进展
,2016,27(2):240-248 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2016.02.009
|
|
关键词
|
土壤水分特征曲线
;
沙箱法
;
Hyprop仪法
;
压力膜仪法
;
露点水势仪法
;
滞后现象
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川, 成都, 610041
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1001-6791 |
|
学科
|
地球物理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5699355
|
参考文献 共
22
共2页
|
|
1.
Strudley M W. Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: state of the science.
Soil and Tillage Research,2008,99:4-48
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
郭向红. 基于混合遗传算法估计van Genuchten方程参数.
水科学进展,2009,20(5):677-682
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Andreas S. Temporal dynamics of soil hydraulic properties and the water-conducting porosity under different tillage.
Soil and Tillage Research,2011,113:89-98
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Schelle H. Combined transient method for determining soil hydraulic properties in a wide pressure head range.
Soil Science Society of America Journal,2011,75:1681-1693
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Moret D. Dynamics of soil hydraulic properties during fallow as affected by tillage.
Soil and Tillage Research,2007,96:103-113
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Peters A. Simplifies evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties.
Journal of Hydrology,2008,356(1/2):147-162
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
吕殿青. 离心机法测定持水征中的土壤收缩变化研究.
水土保持学报,2010,24(3):209-214
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
黄冠华. 土壤水分特性曲线的分形模拟.
水科学进展,2002,13(1):55-60
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Bittelli M. Errors in water retention curves determined with pressure plates.
Soil Science Society of America Journal,2009,73:1453-1460
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Cresswell H P. The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention.
Soil Science Society of America Journal,2008,72:41-49
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
王晓蕾. 利用HYPROP系统测定土壤水分参数的优缺点及改进.
中国农村水利水电,2012(6):4-7
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
彭紫赟. HYPROP系统与快速离心法联合测定土壤水分特征曲线.
灌溉排水学报,2012,31(5):7-11
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
王红兰. 土壤水分特征曲线测定中低吸力段数据的影响分析.
灌溉排水学报,2012,31(6):56-59
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Solone R. Errors in water retention curves determined with pressure plates: effects on the soil water balance.
Journal of Hydrology,2012(470/471):65-74
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Zhao P. Tracing water flow from sloping farmland to streams using oxygen-18 isotope to study a small agricultural catchment in southwest China.
Soil and Tillage Research,2013,134:180-194
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
王红兰. 施用生物炭对紫色土坡耕地耕层土壤水力学性质的影响.
农业工程学报,2015,31(4):107-112
|
被引
53
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Schindler U. Simplifying the evaporation method for quantifying soil hydrulic properties.
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil,2006,169(5):623-629
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Schelle H. Water retention characteristics of soils over the whole moisture range: a comparison of laboratory methods.
European Journal of Soil Science,2013,64:814-821
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Gee G W. The influence of hydraulic non-equilibrium on pressure plate data.
Vadose Zone Journal,2002,1(1):172-178
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Wang H L. Within year changes in hydraulic properties of a shallow entisol in farmland and forestland.
Vadose Zone Journal,2015,14(7):1-15
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问