影响时空隐喻理解中时间运动视角选择的因素
The Factors that Influence the Choices of Time Movement Perspectives in Spatial-Temporal Metaphors
查看参考文献71篇
|
文摘
|
"自我动"和"时间动"在时空隐喻中常被用来表征时间的运动方式, 代表了人们理解个体与时间相对运动的不同视角。大量研究已证实这两种时间运动视角存在心理现实性。人们对时间运动视角的选择受到空间运动经验、情绪、语言与文化、个体差异等具身因素的影响, 反映了时空隐喻理解中视角选择的灵活性。时间运动视角选择的相关研究不仅有助于我们深入认识语言与思维、情感、运动经验等之间的关系, 同时也为具身认知理论提供了进一步的实验证据。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
A large number of research has confirmed the psychological reality of two types of spatial-temporal metaphoric systems: the ego-moving metaphor and the time-moving metaphor. They are often used to represent the way how time move and also represent two perspectives people used to comprehend the relative motion between self and time. In daily life, many factors such as spatial motion experience, emotion, language and culture as well as individual differences can influence the individual choice between the two perspectives, which further reflects the flexibility of its cognitive process. Research focusing on detecting further factors explaining which metaphoric system a speaker uses not only enhances our comprehension of the relationship between language and thought, emotion, and sensorimotor experience, but also provides further experimental evidence to embodiment cognition. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2015,23(10):1711-1722 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01711
|
|
关键词
|
时空隐喻
;
时间运动视角
;
心理现实性
;
具身认知
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家973计划
;
中国国家自然科学基金委面上项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5544128
|
参考文献 共
71
共4页
|
|
1.
毕翠华. 非语言情境中时间加工与空间距离加工的关系.
心理科学进展,2011,19(3):346-354
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈巍. 具身化、隐喻理解与情绪启动.
浙江社会科学,2012(8):100-104,158
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
陈燕. 时间隐喻研究述评.
心理科学进展,2006,14(4):604-609
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
杜蕾. 愤怒的动机方向.
心理科学进展,2012,20(11):1843-1849
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
金泓. 时空隐喻研究的新问题:时间表征的左右方向性.
心理科学进展,2012,20(9):1364-1371
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
杨晓红. 时间隐喻中的空间参照框架.
心理科学进展,2010,18(1):1-9
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
叶浩生. 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向.
心理科学进展,2010,18(5):705-710
|
被引
58
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
周榕. 时间隐喻表征的跨文化研究.
心理科学,2000,23(2):141-146
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Alloway T P. The roles of thought and experience in the understanding of spatio-temporal metaphors.
Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Cognitive Science Society,2001:9-14
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Barsalou L W. Grounded cognition.
Annual Review of Psychology,2008,59:617-645
|
被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Becchio C. Time and neglect: Abnormal temporal dynamics in unilateral spatial neglect.
Neuropsychologia,2006,44(14):2775-2782
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors.
Cognition,2000,75(1):1-28
|
被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.
Cognitive Psychology,2001,43(1):1-22
|
被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Boroditsky L. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought.
Psychological Science,2002,13(2):185-189
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Boroditsky L. How languages construct time.
Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought,2011:333-341
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Boroditsky L. How language shapes thought.
Scientific American,2011,304(2):62-65
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Boroditsky L. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?.
Cognition,2011,118(1):123-129
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Bradley M M. Emotion and motivation.
Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.),2007:581-607
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Burr D C. Saccades compress space, time and number.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2010,14:528-533
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Buxbaum L J. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.
Neuropsychologia,2003,41(8):1091-1113
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问