注意资源、学习方式与年龄因素对协作抑制的影响
The Effect of Attention, Learning Styles and Age on Collaborative Inhibition
查看参考文献17篇
|
文摘
|
本研究在前人研究的基础上,试图探讨不同编码因素对协作抑制效应的制约作用,从协作抑制角度为挖掘集体记忆的作用机制提供证据。实验1结果发现,集中注意条件下,出现协作抑制;分配注意条件下,协作抑制消失。说明学习时注意资源的投入程度,对协作抑制有影响。实验2结果发现不同的学习方式对协作抑制的影响在不同年龄被试身上表现不同。本研究将视角聚焦于编码因素,研究结果证实,协作抑制受到不同编码因素的制约,此外,本结果亦为协作抑制的提取策略破坏假说提供了新的证据。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Collaborative inhibition (CI) refers to a phenomenon that, at the retrieval phase, learners recall less when working collaboratively in a group than working by themselves. Research on the mechanism of the phenomenon of CI is one of the most popular topics in psychology in recent years. However, previous studies paid more attention on the influential factors from the retrieval phase, while the studies that explored the CI effect from the encoding phase were insufficient. On the basis of previous studies, we tried to explore the factors from the encoding phase that might have an effect on CI. This approach may provide solid data for the exploration of the mechanisms of collective memory. Two experiments were used in our study. Experiment 1 asked the participants to learn word lists under full or divided attention conditions; the results of group performances would show whether the involvement of attention in the encoding phase had an influence on CI or not. Experiment 2 controlled the learning styles, with 8, 11, 14,17, 20 years old of students as the participants, and explored the effect of the learning styles on the phenomenon of CI among the students of different ages. The results showed that: (1) Under the full attention condition, the phenomenon of CI showed up, while under the condition of divided attention it did not; which indicated the involvement of attention in the encoding phase had an effect on CI. (2) Both under self-controlled and other-controlled conditions of learning styles, the participants of different ages showed a CI effect. For the ages of 8, 11, 17, 20 students, the CI effects were similar between self-controlled and other-controlled conditions; while for the students of 14 yeas old the CI effect under self-controlled learning style was significantly higher than that of other-controlled learning style. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that the effect of learning styles on the phenomenon of CI was different among students of different ages. The results of our study supported the explanation of the retrieval strategy disruption by the hypothesis of CI. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2015,38(2):290-295 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
协作抑制
;
提取策略破坏假说
;
注意资源
;
学习方式
;
编码任务
|
|
地址
|
天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津, 300387
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题
;
天津市哲学社科规划重点课题
;
国家教育部人文社会科学研究项目
;
天津市高等学校创新团队培养计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5427484
|
参考文献 共
17
共1页
|
|
1.
包燕. 分配注意对短时记忆中知觉组织的影响.
心理学报,2000,32(3):258-263
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
刘希平. 协作抑制的作用机制:来自编码阶段的证据.
心理科学,2014,37(3):559-566
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
刘希平. 协作抑制的认知机制.
心理科学进展,2013,21(5):792-799
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Barber S J. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
Memory,2011,19(5):462-469
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Barber S J. Learning and remembering with others: The key role of retrieval in shaping group recall and collective memory.
Social Cognition,2012,30(1):121-132
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Basden B H. A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,1997,23:1176-1191
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Basden B H. Costs and benefits of collaborative rem-embering.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,2000,14:497-507
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Blumen H M. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
Memory,2008,16:231-244
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Clark S E. Group collaboration in recognition memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition,2000,26:1578-1588
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Craik F I. Divided attention and memory: Impairment of processing or consolidation?.
Memory, consciousness and the brain: The Tallinn conference,2000:38-51
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Finlay F. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2000,26:1556-1567
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Miller P A. Individual differences in children's strategic behaviors: Utilization deficiencies.
Learning and Individual Difference,1994,6:285-307
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Hoss M. Collaboration reduces the frequency of false memories in older and younger adults.
Psychology and Aging,2008,23:85-92
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Takahashi M. Does collaborative remembering reduce false memories?.
British Journal of Psychology,2007,98:1-13
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Takahashi M. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?.
Memoij,2004,12:722-731
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Wright D B. Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups.
Psychononic Bullptin and Review,2004,11:1080-1083
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Yaron-Anlar A. Collaborative remembering of emotional events: The case of Rabin's assassination.
Memory,2006,14:46-56
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问