自我调节疲劳量表中文版测评青年人的效度与信度
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale in young adults
查看参考文献20篇
|
文摘
|
目的:引入自我调节疲劳量表(SRF-S),并在青年人群中对其效度和信度进行检验。方法:选取北京市某高校一年级研究生238名和某国企青年职工315名,通过条目分析、验证性因子分析检验量表的条目鉴别力和结构效度,选用简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)和自我控制双系统量表(DMSC-S)为效标,考察量表的效标关联效度;对研究生样本进行间隔2周的重测,评定量表的重测信度。结果:SRF-S的条目鉴别力良好,各条目与所属分量表的相关在0.38~0.67之间。验证性因子分析结果表明,剔除2个因子载荷低于0.32的条目后,量表的结构效度较好(χ~2/df=5.08、RMSEA=0.09、NFI=0.90、NNFI=0.90、CFI=0.92、IFI=0.92、GFI=0.90),各条目的因子载荷在0.37~0.71之间;SRF-S总分及3个分量表得分与消极应对方式、冲动系统得分均呈正相关(r=0.25~0.58,均P<0.001),与积极应对方式和控制系统得分呈负相关(r=-0.22~-0.47,均P<0.001)。总量表的内部一致性 α 系数为0.84,3个分量表的α系数在0.64~0.69之间;总量表的重测信度为0.73,3个分量表的重测信度在0.62~0.67之间。结论:本研究形成的包含16个条目的自我调节疲劳量表中文版具有较好的效度和信度,适合用于评估我国青年人的自我调节疲劳状况。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale (SRF-S) in Chinese young people. Methods:A sample of 553 young people from a university and a state-owned enterprise was administrated with the SRF-S,the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) and the Dual-Mode Self-Control Scale (DMSC-S).Item analysis was conducted to identify valid items and revise the scale.Then the construct validity of the revised scale was tested through confirmatory factor analysis.Finally,a sample of 238 graduate students was retested two weeks later to examine the reliability of the scale. Results:Item analysis showed that the SRF-S had satisfactory item discrimination (r>0.38).Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the whole scale had a three-order factor and good construct validity (χ~2/df=5.08,RMSEA=0.09,NFI=0.90,NNFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,IFI=0.92,GFI=0.90) after removing 2 items with factor loadings lower than 0.32,and the range of factor loading was between 0.37 and 0.71.The SRF-S total and subscale scores were positively correlated with the scores of negative coping and poor control (r=0.25-0.58,Ps<0.001),and were negatively associated with the scores of positive coping and good self-Control (r=-0.22--0.47,Ps<0.001).The Cronbach' s α coefficients were 0.84 for the total scale,and 0.64 to 0.69 for the three subscales,respectively;the test-retest reliability coefficients were 0.73 for the total scale,and 0.62 to 0.67 for the three subscales,respectively. Conclusion:It suggests that the Chinese version of SFR-S could be used as an effective and reliable tool for assessing self-regulatory fatigue state among Chinese young people. |
|
来源
|
中国心理卫生杂志
,2015,29(4):290-294 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.04.010
|
|
关键词
|
自我调节疲劳
;
信度
;
效度
;
心理测量学
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
南京师范大学强化培养学院, 南京, 210023
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6729 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家科技支撑计划项目
;
中国科学院心理健康重点实验室经费资助(急性自我损耗对网络游戏成瘾者冲动控制的作用机制)
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5403524
|
参考文献 共
20
共1页
|
|
1.
Job V. Ego depletion-is it all in your head?Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation.
Psychol Sci,2010,21(11):1686-1693
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Schmeichel B J. Exercising self-control increases approach motivation.
J Pers Soc Psychol,2010,99(1):162-173
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Inzlicht M. What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control.
Perspect Psychol Sci,2012,7(5):450-463
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Wagner D D. Self-regulatory depletion enhances neural responses to rewards and impairs top-down control.
Psychol Sci,2013,24(11):2262-2271
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Baumeister R F. Ego depletion:is the active self a limited resource?.
J Pers Soc Psychol,1998,74(5):1252-1265
|
被引
99
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Vohs K D. Self-regulatory failure:a resource-depletion approach.
Psychol Sci,2000,11(3):249-254
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Carlson S M. Less is more:executive function and symbolic representation in preschool children.
Psychol Sci,2005,16(8):609-616
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Bertrams A. Self-control strength in the relation between trait test anxiety and state anxiety.
J Res Pers,2010,44(6):738-741
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Nes L S. Self-regulatory fatigue in chronic multisymptom illnesses:scale development,fatigue,and self-control.
J Pain Res,2013,6:181-188
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Dvorak R D. Moderation of resource depletion in the self-control strength model:differing effects of two modes of self-control.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,2009,35(5):572-583
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Brown J M. The self-regulation questionnaire.
Innovations in clinical practice:a sourcebook,1999:281-292
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Christian M S. Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance:a self-regulatory perspective.
Acad Manag J,2011,54(5):913-934
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
解亚宁. 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究.
中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6(2):114-115
|
被引
182
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Afari N. Coping strategies in twins with chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome.
J Psychosom Res,2000,48(6):547-554
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Nater U M. Coping styles in people with chronic fatigue syndrome identified from the general population of Wichita,KS.
J Psychosom Res,2006,60(6):567-573
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Ray C. Coping and other predictors of outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome:a 1-year follow-up.
J Psychosom Res,1997,43(4):405-415
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
谢东杰. 青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版的效度和信度.
中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(5):386-391
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
赵必华. 心理量表编制中的若干问题及题解.
心理科学,2010,33(6):1467-1469
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
冯晓杭. 自我意识情绪:人类高级情绪.
心理科学进展,2007,15(6):878-884
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
严由伟. 压力反应,压力应对与睡眠质量关系述评.
心理科学进展,2010,18(11):1734-1746
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问