动物实验方法学和报告质量评估工具的横断面研究
Assessment Tools for Reporting Quality and Methodological Quality of Animal Experiments: A Cross-sectional Study
查看参考文献44篇
文摘
|
目的全面收集国内外用于评估动物实验方法学和报告质量的工具/指南,比较其研发基础、适用范围和目的,为不同工具/指南的科学选择提供参考依据。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、CNKI、VIP和WanFang Data,查找用于评估原始动物实验研究方法学和报告质量的工具/指南,检索时限截至2014年7月。提取各指南/工具的条目数、研发基础、基于的疾病模型,适用范围及评估重点等信息,对其行描述性分析。结果最终纳入32个研究,其中报告质量评估工具6个,方法学质量评估工具26个。各评估工具/指南的条目数在2~54之间,其中7个采用评分制对其质量进行评估。15个工具仅针对具体的疾病模型。19个适用于临床前药物研究,4个仅适用于环境毒理学方面的研究。结论至今虽已有多个评估工具用于评估动物实验的方法学质量,但SYRCLE动物实验偏倚风险评估工具是目前唯一专门针对动物实验内在真实性评估的工具。此外,对于报告工具,虽然ARRIVE指南和GSPC清单目前均非官方强制性的研究报告标准,但大多数学者公认其为撰写和发表动物实验的有效参考清单和写作指南。因此,推荐使用SYRCLE动物实验风险评估工具、ARRIVE指南和GSPC清单,以有效地提高动物实验设计、实施、报告以及对动物实验的鉴别能力、评估水平,促进动物实验的发展,促进科学成果充分利用和转化。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To provide references for scientific selection of different tools/guidelines by comprehensively collecting international and national tools/guidelines for assessing reporting quality and methodological quality of animal experiments, comparing them in development foundation, application scope, and aims. Methods PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched up to July 2014, to collect tools/guidelines for reporting quality and methodological quality of primary animal experiments. We extracted data from included guidelines/tools, including the number of items, development foundation, disease models, application scope, and assessment focus. Then descriptive analysis was conducted. Results A total of 32 studies were finally included, of which, 6 were for reporting quality and 26 for methodological quality. The item number of the included tools/guidelines ranged from 2 to 54. Seven tools/guidelines applied score system to assess methodological quality. Fifteen tools/guidelines were designed for specific disease models. Nineteen tools/guidelines were suitable for assessing preclinical drug studies, and 4 were designed to assess environmental toxicology research. Conclusion Although many tools for assessing methodological quality of animal experiments have been published so far, SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool is the only one that is used to assess internal validity of animal experiments at present. Besides, although the ARRIVE guidelines and GSPC are not official mandatory reporting criteria at present, they are acknowledged by many researchers as efficient reference checklists and writing guidelines for writing and publishing animal experiments. We recommend the application of SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool, ARRIVE guidelines and GSPC, in order to efficiently improve research design, implementation, reporting, differentiation, and evaluation of animal experiments, promote the development of animal experiments, and to promote full application and translation of scientific achievements. |
来源
|
中国循证医学杂志
,2015,15(2):223-229 【扩展库】
|
DOI
|
10.7507/1672-2531.20150038
|
关键词
|
动物实验
;
方法学质量
;
报告学质量
;
指南/工具
|
地址
|
1.
兰州大学第一医院中西医结合疼痛科, 兰州, 730000
2.
兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室, 兰州, 730000
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1672-2531 |
学科
|
临床医学 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金青年项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5357939
|
参考文献 共
44
共3页
|
1.
贺争鸣. 论实验动物福利、动物实验与动物实验替代方法.
实验动物科学与管理杂志,2005,22(1):61-64
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Roberts I. Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitation.
BMJ,2002,324(7335):474-476
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Kilkenny C. Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals.
PLoS ONE,2009,4(11):e7824
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Begg C. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
JAMA,1996,276(8):637-639
|
被引
82
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Kilenny C. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
PLoS Biol,2010,8(6):e1000412
|
被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Hooijmans C R. A gold Standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible.
Altern Lab Anim,2010,38(2):167-182
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
7.
National Research Council (US) Institute for Laboratory Animal Research.
Guidance for the Description of Animal Research in Scientific Publications,2011
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Vesterinen H M. Systematic survey of the design, statistical analysis, and reporting of studies published in the 2008 volume of the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2011,31(4):1064-1072
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Lamontagne F. Systematic review of reviews including animal studies addressing therapeutic interventions for sepsis.
Crit Care Med,2010,38(12):2401-2408
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Montori V M. Randomized trials stopped early forbenefit: a systematic review.
JAMA,2005,294(17):2203-2209
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Agerstrand M. Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.
Environ Pollut,2011,159(10):2487-2492
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Conrad J W Jr. Enhancing credibility of chemical safety studies: emerging consensus on key assessment criteria.
Environ Health Perspect,2010,119:757-764
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Verhagen H. The 10 basic requirements for a scientific paper reporting antioxidant, antimutagenic or anticarcinogenic potential of test substances in in vitro experiments and animal studies in vivo.
Food Chem Toxicol,2003,41(5):603-610
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Festing M F. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals.
ILAR J,2003,43(4):244-258
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Altman D G. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed),1983,286(6376):1489-1493
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Festing M F. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments in papers submitted to ATLA.
Altern Lab Anim,2001,29(4):427-446
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Festing M F. Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts on studies involving live animals. Synopsis of the workship.
Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics,1997:405-410
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Johnson P D. Practical aspects of experimental design in animal research.
ILAR J,2002,43(4):202-206
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
19.
De Aguilar-Nascimento J E. Fundamental steps in experi-mental design for animal studies.
Acta Cir Bras,2005,20(1):2-8
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Festing M F. Principles: the need for better experimental design.
Trends Pharmacol Sci,2003,24(7):341-345
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|