影响动作图片命名的因素
Predictors of Action Picture Naming in Mandarin Chinese
查看参考文献42篇
|
文摘
|
图片是研究词汇习得与加工的重要材料, 而名词和动词是最主要的两类实词。然而, 目前较少有研究考察汉语中的动词加工过程, 也没有标准化的动词图片库。本研究通过成人图片命名和评定任务, 获得了265张动词图片的中文名称、命名反应时, 以及 H 值、命名一致性、熟悉性、视觉复杂性、表象一致性和口语习得年龄等指标, 同时也探索了影响动作图片命名反应时的因素。逐步回归分析结果发现, H 值、熟悉性和视觉复杂性这三个变量可解释动词图片命名反应时72.4%的变异。此外, 本研究根据图片命名反应时将动词图片加工难度分成了五个等级。研究发现, 与名词图片相比, 动词图片的视觉复杂性更高、命名一致性更低、命名反应时更长。本研究获得的各项心理语言学指标有望为后续关于动词加工的实验研究提供重要的参考资料。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Nouns and verbs are two main categories of content words, and they are learned early by children. It remains in hot debate regarding whether Mandarin Chinese is a verb-friendly language for children. However,few studies examined verb processing in Mandarin, and there were no standard experimental materials that are available for researchers. Therefore, it is unclear what factors may influence action picture naming in Mandarin and whether it is similar to the rules in object picture naming.Thirty-six adults participated in picture naming and 112 adults participated in rating tasks. All participants were native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. The materials were 275 pictures from the IPNP website (see http://crl.ucsd.edu/experiments/ipnp/) (Szekely et al., 2004), of which 10 pictures were deleted because Chinese adults could not name them correctly. Chinese verb names, naming latency, name agreement, H value,familiarity, visual complexity, image agreement, and oral age of acquisition (AoA) were obtained for the 265 action pictures. Results from stepwise regression analysis showed that H value familiarity and visual complexity explained 72.4% of the variances in picture naming latency, whereas other variables such as word frequency and AoA were excluded from the final model. Moreover, the pictures were categorized into five levels of difficulty based on the naming latency.A comparison of the present study to previous studies that examined object picture naming in Mandarin showed that action picture naming (with a mean latency of 1617 ms) was more difficult than object picture naming (with a mean latency of 1324 ms or 1044 ms, Liu, Hao, Li, & Shu, 2011; Zhang & Yang, 2003). In addition, name agreement of action pictures was lower than that of object pictures, and visual complexity of action pictures was higher than that of object pictures.These results indicated that action picture naming was difficult for adult participants. One possibility is that it might be particularly difficult for Mandarin speakers to extract meaning out of the static action pictures and verbalize them. More investigations are needed to explore the mechanisms of verb processing in Mandarin Chinese, and the measures obtained from the present study can provide valuable tools for future researchers to examine verb processing in Mandarin. |
|
来源
|
心理学报
,2015,47(1):11-18 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
汉语动词
;
图片命名
;
熟悉性
;
命名一致性
;
H 值
|
|
地址
|
1.
山西大学教育科学学院, 太原, 030006
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院重点部署项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5333742
|
参考文献 共
42
共3页
|
|
1.
Almeida J. The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming:When recognizing is not enough.
Psychonomic Bulletin &Review,2007,14(6):1177-1182
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Au T K F. Input vs constraints: Early word acquisition in Korean and English.
Journal of Memory and Language,1994,33(5):567-582
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Barry C. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming.
Journal of Memory and Language,2001,44(3):350-375
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Bates E. Timed picture naming in seven languages.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2003,10(2):344-380
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bornstein M H. Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French,Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English.
Child Development,2004,75(4):1115-1139
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Carroll J B. Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,1973,25(1):85-95
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Chan C C. English-and Chinese-learning infants map novel labels to objects and actions differently.
Developmental Psychology,2011,47(5):1459-1471
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
陈新葵. 影响汉语动词、名词识别因素的回归分析.
心理科学,2010,33(1):60-63
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
陈新葵. 中文身体动词的语义特异性加工.
华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2013(4):56-60
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
陈永香. 词汇学习中“快速映射”现象的机制.
心理科学进展,2009,17(1):71-77
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium.
现代汉语通用词表[Chinese Lexicon] (CLDC-LAC-2003-01),2003
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Cotelli M. Action and object naming in frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration.
Neuropsychology,2006,20(5):558-565
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Fernald A.
Looking while listening: using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children (Vol. 44),2008
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Gentner D. On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning.
Child Development,1978,48:988-998
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Gentner D.
Why nouns are learned before verbs:Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning,1982
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Gillette J. Human simulations of vocabulary learning.
Cognition,1998,73(2):135-176
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Gilhooly K J. Imagery, concretness, age of acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 5-letter words having single-solution anagrams.
Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,1977,9(1):12-17
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Gleitman L. The structural sources of verb meanings.
Language Acquisition,1990,1(1):3-55
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Graves W W. A neural signature of phonological access:Distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2007,19(4):617-631
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
韩在柱. 汉语名词特异性损伤的个案研究.
心理科学,2005,28(4):909-911
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问