锚定效应的产生前提及作用机制
The Precondition and Mechanism of Anchoring Effect
查看参考文献19篇
文摘
|
为了探讨锚定效应的产生前提及基础锚定效应的理论解释,实验一选取高、低、无三种锚值,设置了15ms、45ms、75ms、1000ms四种呈现时间,结果发现只有15ms条件下未出现锚定效应,呈现时间越长,锚定效应越大。实验二设置了语意相同但表述形式不同的两种锚值,结果发现,大数字锚值使估计值偏高,小数字锚值使估计值偏低。该发现说明锚定效应的产生前提是注意,数字启动假说可以更好地解释基础锚定效应。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Anchoring effect–the disproportionate influence on decision makers to make judgments that are biased toward an initially presented value –is typically described as robust and prevalence, which affects human’s decisions under uncertainty. Basic anchoring effect is caused by a single number.The researches of anchoring effect will help us understand the impact of this judgmental heuristic in decision making and explore effective ways to reduce the bias. There have been numerous researches on anchoring effect, however, the precondition of anchoring effect, whether basic anchoring effect exist and the mechanism of it are not clear to this day and there has been considerable controversy. In order to investigate these problems, we conducted two experiments. In the first experiment, we exploited a mixed design to explore whether attention to the anchor as the precondition of anchoring effect, with anchor levels high, low, non) as within-subject variable and presentation time (15ms, 45ms, 75ms, 1000ms) as between-subject variable. We recruited 120 college students to participate in our experiment. The results showed that in 15ms condition, there was no anchoring effect, whereas in 75ms and 1000ms conditions, both observed anchoring effect, suggesting that attention to the anchor not comparison was very important to anchoring effect. In addition, in 45ms condition, participants were aware of low anchors but not high anchors, and we observed anchoring effect only in the low anchor condition. In sum, whether the anchor was high or low, anchoring effect emerged only when participants were aware of the anchor. Therefor, attention to the anchor is the precondition of anchoring effect. With increased time to pay attention to anchors, the anchoring effect grew larger, which provided initial evidence supported Numeric Priming Account. The second study started from the conflict of the Selective Accessibility Account and the Numeric Priming Account, we set pairs of anchors which had identical semantic meaning but different presentations, such as 5 kilograms and 5000 grams. Results of 20 students showed that the two type of anchors lead to different anchoring effect, which supported the Numeric Priming Account. |
来源
|
心理科学
,2014,37(5):1060-1063 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
锚定效应
;
基础锚定效应
;
选择通达假说
;
数字启动假说
|
地址
|
1.
天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津, 300387
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
基金
|
天津市高等学校创新团队培养计划的资助
;
天津市哲学社会科学规划重点课题
;
天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题
;
国家教育部人文社会科学研究项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5253912
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
1.
曲琛. 锚定判断中的心理刻度效应:来自ERP的证据.
心理学报,2008,40(6):681-692
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
2.
张志杰. 时距估计中的锚定效应.
心理学报,2008,40(2):160-165
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Adaval R. Conscious and nonconscious comparisons with price anchors: Effects on willingness to pay for related and unrelated products.
Journal of Marketing Research,2011,48(2):355-365
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Bergman O. Anchoring and cognitive ability.
Economics Letters,2010,107(1):66-68
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Brewer N T. The fragil basic anchoring effect.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2002,15:65-77
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Chaxel A S. The impact of procedural priming of selective accessibility on self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2014,50:45-51
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Englich B. When knowledge matters-differential effects of available knowledge in standard and basic anchoring tasks.
European Journal of Social Psychology,2008,38(5):896-904
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Epstude K. What you feel is How you compare: How comparisons influence the social induction of affect.
Emotion,2009,9(1):1-14
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Eroglu C. Biases in judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts: The role of individual differences.
International Journal of Forecasting,2010,26(1):116-133
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Jacowitz K E. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1995,21(11):1161-1166
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Janiszewski C. Precision of the anchor influences the amount of adjustment.
Psychological Science,2008,19(2):121-127
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Mussweiler T. Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2005,98(2):133-143
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Mussweiler T. Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm a selective accessibility model.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1999,35:136-164
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Reitsma M R. Subliminal anchoring: The effects of subliminally presented numbers on probability estimates.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2006,42(3):380-387
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Smith A. Biased calculations: Numeric anchors influence answers to math equations.
Judgment and Decision Making,2011,6(1):139-146
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.
Science, N,1974,185:1124-1131
|
被引
140
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Thorsteinson T J. Anchoring effects on performance judgments.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2008,107(1):29-40
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Wilson T D. A new look at anchoring effects basic anchoring and its antecedents.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1996,125(4):387-402
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Wong K F E. Is 7300 m equal to 7.3 km? same semantics but different anchoring effects.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82(2):314-333
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|