热强化气相抽提对不同质地土壤中苯去除的影响
Effect of Thermal Enhanced Soil Vapor Extraction on Benzene Removal in Different Soil Textures
查看参考文献25篇
|
文摘
|
研究应用电阻加热强化气相抽提技术对砂土、 壤土和黏土中苯去除效果的影响及作用机制. 与常规抽提结果相比,在热强化处理作用下气相抽提对砂土和壤土中苯的去除效率提高了13.1%和12.3%,处理时间分别降低75%和14%. 热强化处理使得黏土含水率下降,土壤渗透率升高,黏土颗粒表面羧基和乙基的吸收峰消失,有机质含量减少,苯的去除效率与对照相比提高了34%. 对于砂土和壤土,热强化主要是通过促进苯在土体中扩散来提高去除效率,从而实现在较短时间内污染物质的大量去除; 而对于黏土则是通过降低土壤颗粒表面有机基团的含量,从而降低污染物和土壤颗粒的吸附能力,并通过降低含水率和升高渗透率从而提高土壤中气体的扩散性能,以达到增强气相抽提效果的目的. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of thermal enhanced soil vapor extraction (SVE) on benzene removal from sand, loam and clay and the mechanism. Compared to the routine control treatment, the benzene removal rates were improved by 13.1% and 12.3% and the remediation periods were reduced by 75% and 14%, from sand and loam respectively using thermal enhanced SVE. Thermal enhancement decreased the moisture content and increased the soil permeability of clay. On the surface of clay particles, absorption peaks of carboxyl and ethyl disappeared and the content of soil organic substances decreased significantly. Compared to the conventional SVE, the benzene removal rate was improved by 34% in clay soil treated by thermal enhanced SVE. For sand and loam, thermal enhancement could increase the removal rate by promoting the diffusion of benzene in the soil and achieve substantial removal of pollutants in a relatively short period of time. For clay, it could enhance the effect of SVE by reducing the absorption capacity between soil particle surface and contaminant and improving the performance of the gas diffusion in soil by decreasing the moisture content and increasing the soil permeability. |
|
来源
|
环境科学
,2014,35(10):3888-3895 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13227/j.hjkx.2014.10.035
|
|
关键词
|
加热
;
气相抽提
;
修复
;
质地
;
脱附
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0250-3301 |
|
学科
|
环境污染及其防治 |
|
基金
|
国家863计划
;
国家科技支撑计划项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5244928
|
参考文献 共
25
共2页
|
|
1.
USEPA.
Treatment technologies for site cleanup: Annual status report (Twelfth Edition) (EPA-542-R-07-012),2007
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
刘少卿. 挥发及半挥发有机物污染场地蒸汽抽提修复技术原理与影响因素.
环境科学,2011,32(3):825-833
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
王喜. 依据挥发性污染物浓度变化划分土壤气相抽提过程的研究.
农业环境科学学报,2009,28(5):903-907
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Kaleris V. Estimation of cleanup time for continuous and pulsed soil vapor extraction.
Journal of Hydrology,1997,194(1/4):330-356
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Lenhard R J. A constitutive model for air-NAPL-water flow in the vadose zone accounting for residual NAPL in strongly water-wet porous media.
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2004,73(1/4):281-304
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Alvim-Ferraz M C M. Soil remediation time to achieve clean-up goals I: influence of soil water content.
Chemosphere,2006,62(5):853-860
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Frank U. Remediation of low permeability subsurface formations by fracturing enhancement of soil vapor extraction.
Journal of Hazardous Materials,1995,40(2):191-201
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
USEPA.
In situ soil vapor extraction (EPA-510, B-95-007),1996
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
USEPA.
Development of recommendations and methods to support assessment of soil venting performance and closure (EPA-600, R-01-070),2001
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Poppendieck D G. Predicting hydrocarbon removal from thermally enhanced soil vapor extraction systems 2. Field study.
Journal of Hazardous Materials,1999,69(1):95-105
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Heron G. Soil heating for enhanced remediation of chlorinated solvents: A laboratory study on resistive heating and vapor extraction in a Silty, low-permeable soil contaminated with trichloroethylene.
Environmental Science and Technology,1998,32(10):1474-1481
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Poppendieck D G. Predicting hydrocarbon removal from thermally enhanced soil vapor extraction systems: 1. Laboratory studies.
Journal of Hazardous Materials,1999,69(1):81-93
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Mohamed A M I. Remediation of saturated soil contaminated with petroleum products using air sparging with thermal enhancement.
Journal of Environment Management,2007,83(3):339-350
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Qin C Y. Study on influencing factors on removal of chlorobenzene from unsaturated zone by soil vapor extraction.
Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,176(1/3):294-299
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
James J. Soil clean up by in-situ aeration, XIV, Effects of random permeability variations on soil vapor extraction cleanup times.
Separation Science and Technology,1994,29(6):701-725
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Williams D H.
Spectroscopic methods in organic chemistry,1995
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Fen C S. Influence of spatial variability of soil properties on mass removal for a soil vapor extraction system.
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers,2007,30(6):997-1007
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Yoon H. Impact of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) source zone architecture on mass removal mechanisms in strongly layered heterogeneous porous media during soil vapor extraction.
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2008,100(1/2):58-71
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Park G. A laboratory and pilot study of thermally enhanced soil vapor extraction method for the removal of semi-volatile organic contaminants.
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering,2005,40(4):881-897
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Sun H. Short-and long-term sorption/desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons onto artificial solids: effects of particle and pore sizes and organic matters.
Water Resource,2003,37(12):2960-2968
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问