城市居住空间分异背景下青少年成长的邻里影响——以广州市鹭江村与逸景翠园为例
Neighborhood influences on adolescent development under the background of urban residential space differentiation: a case study of Lujiang Village and Yijing Community
查看参考文献21篇
|
文摘
|
城市居住空间分异是现代城市社会阶层分化导致的普遍现象,西方许多研究证明这种特定人群集中居住的邻里会对其中的青少年的成长产生多方面的影响。本文以广州市鹭江村和逸景翠园社区为例进行对比研究,探究中国城市中不同邻里对居住在其中的青少年成长的影响。在此将邻里特征分为社会经济特征、家庭教育观念特征、同龄人交往特征、机构资源特征4个方面,运用logistic回归分析发现,上述4个方面的邻里特征确实会对青少年的成长产生影响,其中社会经济特征对青少年的学习成绩有影响,家庭教育观念特征影响青少年的教育表现与心理状态,同龄人交往特征则对青少年性格有重要影响,机构资源特征会影响青少年发展机会的获得。而邻里影响的作用机制可以用Jencks等的邻里机构资源模式和群体社会化模式来解释。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In recent years, with the rapid urbanization and economic and social transitions, social class stratification began to emerge in China, and residential space differentiation in Chinese cities has become increasingly apparent. Chinese scholars have started to examine the residential space differentiation phenomenon and its effects. Using survey data and in-depth interviews, this research explores the effects of neighborhood characteristics on adolescent education and development, taking Lujiang Village and Yijing Community in the haizhu district of Guangzhou as cases. Neighborhood characteristics include its socioeconomic, institutional resource, education concept , and peer interaction characteristics. The development results of teenagers include aspects such as learning ability, psychological states, personality and future development opportunities. Based on the selected variables, this paper uses a logistic regression model to analyze the relationship between the variables. At first, the research preliminarily determines whether the independent variables affect the dependent variable according to the results of model analysis. It then uses data from the questionnaire survey and interviews in the two communities to confirm whether the results of model analysis are consistent with the actual situation. This study shows that these four aspects do have various degrees of effects on adolescent education and development. Firstly, neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics affect the adolescents' learning ability. Parents who live in a highly educated, affluent and prestigous neighborhood have more experience and can spend more time and money on their children's education. Secondly, the education concepts and behavioral characteristics of families affect the adolescents' psychological states. More communication between parents and children and emphasis on the children's education make the relationship between the children and their parents more harmonious and reduce stresses of children. By comparing similar poorly educated families in two different communities, this research found that the poorly educated families living in the upscale neighborhood are obviously affected by the highly educated families—they share similar education concepts and adopt similar behaviors, and their children have similar development results. The same is true for the poor neighborhood, Lujiang Village. Thirdly, peer interaction characteristics affect adolescents' personality. Teenagers living in poor communities face more intense relationships and are more marginalized and they are more easily bullied by other teenagers, leading to their introverted character and more negative emotions. Lastly, institutional resource characteristics affect the adolescents' development opportunities. High quality of teaching, good facilities and rich campus activities increase the probability of students to enter key middle schools. The mechanism of neighborhood effects can be explained by the neighborhood institutional resource model and the collective socialization model put forward by Jencks and Mayer. In the institutional neighborhood resource model, neighborhoods affect the development opportunities of adolescents by providing different qualities of public services such as schools and sports facility. In the collective socialization model, neighborhoods influence adolescents' values, personality and behaviors and habits by affecting families' concepts and behavioral characteristics and interpersonal relationships between peers. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2014,33(6):756-764 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
邻里影响
;
青少年成长
;
居住空间分异
;
机构资源
;
群体社会化
|
|
地址
|
1.
北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京, 100871
2.
中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 广州, 510006
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
建筑科学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5185137
|
参考文献 共
21
共2页
|
|
1.
何邕健. 1990年以来天津市中心城区居住空间结构演变.
城市问题,2006(6):65-69
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李志刚. 转型期上海社会空间分异研究.
地理学报,2006,61(2):199-211
|
被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
刘勇. 邻里作用对社会机会的影响: 西方的研究及对中国的启示.
规划师,2006,22(4):77-80
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
吴启焰. 现代中国城市居住空间分异机制的理论研究.
人文地理,2002,17(3):26-31
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
袁媛. 转型期中国城市贫困和剥夺的空间模式.
地理学报,2009,64(6):753-763
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Brooke S. Examining neighborhood and school effects simultaneously: what does the Dutch evidence show.
Urban Education,2011,48(7):1307-1331
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Chase- Lansdale L P. Economic hardship and the development of five-and six-year-olds: neighborhood and regional perspectives.
Child Development,1996,67:3338-3367
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Crane J. The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing.
American Journal of Sociology,1991,96:1226-1259
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Del-Conte A. A synthesis of MTO research on self- sufficiency, safety and health, and behavior and delinquency.
Poverty Research News,2001,5(1):3-6
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ellen I G. Does neighborhood matter? assessing recent evidence.
Housing Policy Debate,1997,18(4):833-866
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Ennett S T. School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use.
Journal of Health and Social Behavior,1997,38:55-71
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Gonzales N A. Family, peer, and neighborhood influences on academic achievement among African-American adolescents: one year prospective effects.
American Journal of Community Psychology,1996,24(3):365-387
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Harris J R. Where is the child's environment? a group socialization theory of development.
Psychological Review,1995,102(3):458-489
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Jencks C.
The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood,1990
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Kornhauser R R.
Social sources of delinquency: an appraisal of analytic models,1978
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Leventhal T. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighb- orhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes.
Psychological Bulletin,2000,126(2):309-337
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Robert J S. Assessing "neighborhood effects": social processes and new directions in research.
Annual Review of Sociology,2002,28(2):443-478
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Rosario C. The influence of neighborhood quality on adolescents' educational values and school effort.
Journal of Adolescent Research,2004,19(6):716-739
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Shaw C R.
Juvenile delinquency and urban areas,1942
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Thrupp M. Taking school contexts more seriously: the social justice chal-lenge.
British Journal of Educational Studies,2006,54(3):308-328
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问