协作抑制的作用机制:来自编码阶段的证据
The Mechanism of Collaborative Inhibition: Evidence from the Encoding Phase
查看参考文献24篇
|
文摘
|
协作抑制是指当人们在一个记忆小组中一起提取信息的时候,小组提取的信息总量比等量个体提取的信息总量要少。本研究采用经典的协作抑制研究范式和两次提取任务,考察编码方式和学习次数对协作提取任务的影响,从而进一步探讨协作抑制的产生机制。结果表明,编码方式相同条件下出现协作抑制,而编码方式不同条件下协作抑制消失,显示协作抑制的出现与否依赖于认知条件的改变;无论是学习一次还是学习两次,在第一次小组提取中出现协作抑制,而在第二次个人提取中协作抑制消失,在使用困难学习材料时也得到同样的研究结果。研究结果支持协作抑制的提取策略破坏假说。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The Collaborative Inhibition refers to the phenomenon that, at the retrieval stage, individuals, when working together as a collaborative group, recall more than any one individual does working alone. However, a collaborative group recalls less than the polled, non-redundant answers of the same number of individuals working alone (a nominal group). There have been a number of studies on this topic since it was found two decades ago. Researches have also given models to explain this effect. Psychologists suggest that the collaborative inhibition may be due to the cognitive factors such as retrieval strategy disruption or retrieval inhibition. The present article makes a review of these studies, with special focus on the two models with the introduction and analysis of recent studies in details. There were three experiments in this study. Experiment 1 had a 2 × 2 × 2 three-factor mixed design, adopted a twice retrieval paradigm, by controlling the original organizational strategy in collaborative groups, to form the collaborative identical and divergent organizational structure groups. Results suggested that within the collaborative identical organizational structure groups, the collaborative inhibition was present and the final individual recall performance was bad; while within the collaborative divergent organizational structure groups, the collaborative inhibition was absent and the final individual recall performance was good. Experiment 2 also adopted a twice-retrieval paradigm, and controlled the study repetition to explore the collaborative recall performance in these two conditions: participants studied categorized word lists once or twice. Results showed that study repetition improved retrieval organization in recall in this experiment, this was consistent with the findings of Pereira-Pasarin & Rajaram(2011). Results also suggested that regardless the frequency of study (once or twice), the collaborative inhibition was eliminated in their final individual recall. Furthermore, experiment 3 used the hard materials, and found the similar results to experiment 2. This result supported the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis. Participants disrupted each other's original organizational strategy in collaborative recall performance. And the result did not give a support to the conclusion that participants had been inhibited when hearing others' recall items. This is not identical with the retrieval inhibition hypothesis based on the explicit methods. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2014,37(3):559-566 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
协作抑制
;
提取策略破坏假说
;
提取抑制假说
;
编码方式
;
学习次数
|
|
地址
|
天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津, 300387
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
基金
|
国家教育部人文社会科学研究项目
;
天津市哲学社会科学规划重点课题
;
第41批留学回国人员科研启动基金
;
天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题
;
全国教育科学规划教育部重点项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5153082
|
参考文献 共
24
共2页
|
|
1.
Barber S J. Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: The role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.
Memory,2011,19(4):378-397
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Barber S J. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
Memory,2011,19(5):462-469
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Barber S J. When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory.
Memory and Cognition,2010,38(3):255-264
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Basden B H. A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1997,23(5):1176-1191
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Battig W F. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph,1969,80:115-127
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Blumen H M. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
Memory,2008,16(3):231-244
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Blumen H M. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
Memory,2009,17(8):840-846
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Brown A D. Forgetting trauma: Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting and Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,2012,26:24-34
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Coman A. Forgetting the unforgettable through conversation: Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of September 11 memories.
Psychological Science,2009,20:627-633
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Congleton A R. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: Prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology,2011,140(4):535-551
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Cuc A. Silence is not golden: A case for socially-shared retrieval-induced forgetting.
Psychological Science,2007,18(9):727-733
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Finlay F. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2000,26(6):1556-1567
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Freuen M T.
Different encoding strategies affect retrieval of information in collaborative groups. Unpublished Master's thesis,2008
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hulbert J C. Evidence against associative blocking as a cause of cue-independent retrieval-induced forgetting.
Experimental Psychology,2012,59(1):11-21
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Orjan D. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?.
Memory,2011,19(2):140-154
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Pereira-Pasarin L P. Study repetition and divided attention: Effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
Memory and Cognition,2011,39:968-976
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Roenker D L. Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall.
Psychological Bulletin,1971,76:45-48
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Rundus D. An analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.
Journal of Experimental Psychology,1971,89:63-77
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Steiner I D.
Group process and productivity,1972
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Stone C B. Building consensus about the past: Schema consistency and convergence in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting.
Memory,2010,18(2):170-184
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问