帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

目的地居民对旅游影响感知的结构关系——以世界自然遗产三清山为例
Structural relationship of residents' perception of tourism impacts: a case study in world natural heritage Mount Sanqingshan

查看参考文献32篇

文摘 居民是旅游利益相关者的重要一方,居民的地方感、对获取利益和付出成本的感知将影响居民的满意度,进而影响旅游地的可持续发展。以三清山景区为案例地,通过问卷调查和访谈,借鉴已有文献构建结构方程模型,结果显示:① 通过因子分析可将旅游影响感知分为成本感知、情感性获益感知和物质性获益感知,情感性获益感知对居民地方感、满意度中介影响最为显著;② 地方感与旅游影响感知存在相互影响,成本感知与地方感相互作用不显著,获益感知与地方感显著正向相关,其中情感性获益感知相对物质性获益感知与地方感相互作用更明显;③ 居民情感性获益感知与物质性获益感知相互作用显著;④ 原住民相对于非原住民地方感更强,情感性获益感知更高,对旅游成本感知更敏感,对物质性获益感知部分低于非原住民。
其他语种文摘 Resident is an important stakeholder of tourism. Sense of place, perception of benefits and costs affect residents' satisfaction, and further affect the sustainable development of tourism resorts. Previous studies were mostly about the one-way relationship of how sense of place affects the perception of tourism impacts, but what is the other way round? Based on an exploratory factor analysis, we find that residents' perception of tourism impacts can be classified into three parts: perceived costs, perceived psychic benefits and perceived physical benefits. Then is there any structural relationship within the residents' perception of tourism impacts? This article uses the world natural heritage Sanqingshan Resort as a case. Based on a review of existing literatures we build a structural equation model (SEM) using questionnaire survey and interview data. The survey questions include basic demographic characteristics of residents, sense of place, perception of tourism impacts, satisfaction and so on. The survey samples are located in the two entrances of the core scenic area of the research site and comprised of 271 residents who are greatly influenced by tourism. The result of this research indicates that: (1) Sense of place and the perception of tourism impacts influence each other. There is no significant mutual impact between cost perception and sense of place. Sense of place and the perceived benefits have a strong impact on each other, especially the perceived psychic benefits influence strongly residents' sense of place. Residents' sense of place as a kind of human emotion has a similar influence on the perceived psychic benefits. The deeper residents' sense of place, the more intense are the perceived psychic benefits, for example, image promotion of tourism resorts. Better psychic benefits improve residents' sense of place. (2) Perceived benefits including perceived psychic benefits and physical benefits play the most significant role on the sense of place and satisfaction in SEM, especially the perceived psychic benefits. These two parts in perceived benefits influence each other significantly. (3) Residents' sense of place has a positive significant impact on satisfaction, the same as perceived psychic benefits and perceived physical benefits, but perceived costs have negative and non-significant impact on satisfaction. Residents' perceived psychic benefits improve satisfaction more efficiently than physical benefits, but this does not mean perceived physical benefits are unimportant: perceived psychic benefits and perceived physical benefits have a strong mutual influence. As tourism develops, local residents feel pride for the place (which denotes a strong perception of psychic benefits), and this generates better expectation for physical benefits. As a result, perceived psychic benefits play a stronger role in connecting residents' sense of place and satisfaction than perceived physical benefits. (4) We also classified the surveyed residents into native and non-native by birthplace to test differences between natives and immigrants. Native residents' sense of place and perceived psychic benefits are higher than non-native, and are more sensitive about perceived costs, while the perceived physical benefits are lower than non-native residents. One shortcoming of this study is that, although the measured variables have high factor loadings, their number is small, which may not be enough to illustrate latent variables efficiently. The number of measured variables should be increased in future research to test the results.
来源 地理科学进展 ,2014,33(4):584-592 【核心库】
关键词 居民 ; 旅游影响感知 ; 物质性获益感知 ; 情感性获益感知 ; 三清山
地址

南京大学地理与海洋科学学院, 南京, 210093

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1007-6301
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家旅游局重点项目 ;  UNESCO委托项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:5131399

参考文献 共 32 共2页

1.  陈晓艳. 农业旅游目的地居民满意度及其影响研究:以南京江心洲为例,2008 被引 1    
2.  程绍文. 自然旅游地社区居民旅游发展期望与旅游影响感知对其旅游态度的影响——对中国九寨沟和英国NF国家公园的比较研究. 地理研究,2010,29(12):2179-2188 被引 9    
3.  杜宗斌. 乡村旅游地居民社区归属感模型构建及应用:以浙江安吉为例. 旅游学刊,2013,28(6):65-74 被引 14    
4.  方楚. 顾客价值驱动的企业绩效模型:元分析验证. 现代管理学,2011(8):8-10 被引 1    
5.  李东和. 居民旅游影响感知和态度的空间分异——以黄山风景区为例. 地理研究,2008,27(4):963-972 被引 18    
6.  李志飞. 少数民族山区居民对旅游影响的感知和态度:以柴埠溪国家森林公园为例. 旅游学刊,2006,21(2):21-25 被引 9    
7.  刘丽梅. 中国社区参与旅游发展研究述评. 地理科学进展,2010,29(8):1018-1024 被引 6    
8.  刘益. 旅游开发对社区居民经济影响的时空分异特征研究:以丹霞山、世外桃源景区为例. 经济地理,2006,26(4):706-709 被引 6    
9.  卢松. 试论旅游地居民感知的研究体系及其对古村落旅游发展的启示. 安徽师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,32(2):178-183 被引 1    
10.  史春云. 旅游地居民感知与态度的比较研究:以九寨沟、庐山和周庄为例. 经济地理,2010,30(8):1400-1407 被引 14    
11.  史春云. 基于个体视角下的旅游地居民感知与态度研究:以九寨沟为例. 北京第二外国语学院学报,2007(11):11-17 被引 4    
12.  苏勤. 基于态度与行为的我国旅游地居民的类型划分--以西递、周庄、九华山为例. 地理研究,2004,23(1):104-114 被引 30    
13.  唐承财. 旅游地可持续发展研究综述. 地理科学进展,2013,32(6):984-992 被引 11    
14.  汪德根. 乡村居民旅游支持度影响模型及机理——基于不同生命周期阶段的苏州乡村旅游地比较. 地理学报,2011,66(10):1413-1426 被引 26    
15.  汪侠. 旅游开发的居民满意度驱动因素——以广西阳朔县为例. 地理研究,2010,29(5):841-851 被引 20    
16.  许振晓. 居民地方感对区域旅游发展支持度影响——以九寨沟旅游核心社区为例. 地理学报,2009,64(6):736-744 被引 40    
17.  杨兴柱. 城市旅游地居民感知差异及其影响因素系统分析:以中山市为例. 城市问题,2005(2):44-50 被引 9    
18.  尹立杰. 基于地方感视角的乡村居民旅游影响感知研究——以安徽省天堂寨为例. 地理研究,2012,31(10):1916-1926 被引 11    
19.  赵晓煜. 享乐型服务的场景要素与顾客行为意向的关系研究. 管理科学,2010,23(4):48-57 被引 3    
20.  Cottrell S P. Resident satisfaction with sustainable tourism: the case of Frankenwald Nature Park, Germany. Tourism Management Perspectives,2013,8:42-48 被引 5    
引证文献 6

1 冯晓华 天山天池景区居民旅游影响感知及旅游参与 干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(12):227-232
被引 6

2 刘军胜 入境游客与社区居民旅游供给感知测评及差异分析——以北京市为例 资源科学,2016,38(8):1476-1490
被引 2

显示所有6篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号