基于转型与协调视角的乡村发展分析——以山东省为例
Rural development from viewpoints of transformation and coordination: a case in Shandong Province
查看参考文献25篇
|
文摘
|
在乡村转型发展进程中,各发展要素转型之间往往存在不协调现象,超前转型或滞后转型现象时有发生,阻碍了乡村乃至整个城乡地域系统的持续、稳定和协调发展。基于此,分析研究区域乡村发展要素间转型的协调性对制定乡村发展战略具有重要的指导意义。综合集成传统地理学调查分析、数量模型模拟及“3S”决策支持等技术方法,构建乡村协调转型度模型,基于“人口—土地—产业”乡村发展三要素,搭建“乡村转型度—综合协调度—协调转型度”三维平台,从“转型”与“协调”视角分析了1990-2009年间山东省乡村发展过程中乡村整体转型速度与乡村发展要素间转型协调性的关系。主要结论如下:① 乡村转型度空间结构逐渐由局部集聚向全局分散转变;综合协调度呈现小集聚、大分散的空间分布格局;协调转型度在“八五”、“九五”、“十五”、“十一五”时期与乡村转型度和综合协调度的空间分布格局呈现不同的耦合特点;② 乡村转型度和综合协调度与协调转型度之间的相关系数分别为0.92和0.61,表明山东省乡村系统与城市系统之间“人口—土地—产业”要素的全面流动促使了其乡村系统的协调转型;③“转型”与“协调”分别代表了乡村转型发展进程中的“量”与“质”,乡村转型发展应秉着数量和质量并重的原则,持续稳定推进。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Rapid urbanization and industrialization are accompanied with rural-urban migration and the recombination and interaction of socioeconomic development factors, which result in the restructuring of rural socioeconomic system and spatial configuration, including the migration of rural people, non- agricultural transition of employment, industrial development, and land use change. These changes break the traditional rural-urban dual structure and result in the overall rural transformation and development. In reality, there is often a lack of coordination between the transformation of rural development factors, which means the transition speed of one rural development factor is faster or slower than that of others. To some extent, this uncoordinated transformation hinders the sustainable development of the rural or the whole rural-urban system. Therefore, it is particularly important to analyze the coordination of transition of rural development factors. Shandong Province, located in the coastal area of eastern China, has experienced drastic changes in land use since the initiation of economic reforms in 1978. Rapid urbanization and industrialization boosted the development in the rural areas. Shandong has similar primary industry structure and similar urbanization rate to China's average. In addition, there is a clear gradient of regional economic growth from the eastern to the central and western parts of the province, which is extremely similar to the general spatial pattern of economic development in China. As such, Shandong Province can be considered a miniature of rural economic development in China. This paper selects Shandong Province as the case study area to analyze the development of rural area from the viewpoints of transformation and coordination. This paper integrates the methods of traditional geographical research and analysis, simulation of quantitative model and decision support system based on the "3S" technology to establish a coordinated transformation degree model and a three- dimensional space of rural transformation degree, integrated coordination degree and coordinated transformation degree, based on the three major rural development elements of population, land and industry. The relationship between rural transformation speed and the coordination characteristics of transformations of rural development elements in Shandong Province was analyzed from the viewpoint of "transformation" and "coordination". The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The spatial pattern of rural transformation degree gradually changed from local clustering to overall dispersion; the distribution of integrated coordination degree took on a dispersion pattern with some small clusters; the spatial pattern of coordinated transformation degree was coupled with that of rural transformation degree during 1990-1995 and 1995-2000, coupled with that of rural transformation degree and integrated coordination degree during 2000-2005, and coupled with the spatial pattern of integrated coordination degree during 2005-2009. (2) The correlation coefficient of rural transformation degree and coordinated transformation degree, and that of integrated coordination degree and coordinated transformation degree are 0.92 and 0.61, respectively. These results indicate that the overall flow of the development elements of population, land and industry between rural and urban systems will promote the coordinated transformation of rural areas. (3) "Transformation" and "coordination" represent the "quantity" and "quality" of development, which should be paid equal attention during the process of rural transformation and development. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2014,33(4):531-541 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
乡村转型发展
;
人口转型
;
土地利用转型
;
产业发展转型
;
协调转型度
;
山东省
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5131394
|
参考文献 共
25
共2页
|
|
1.
陈晓华. “苏南模式”变迁下的乡村转型.
农业经济问题,2008(8):21-25
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈玉福. 苏南地区农村发展进程及其动力机制——以苏州市为例.
地理科学进展,2010,29(1):123-128
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
程叶青. 吉林省中部粮食主产区城乡综合发展水平格局特征.
地理学报,2010,65(12):1591-1601
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
方方. 中国环渤海地区县域土地适度非农化研究.
自然资源学报,2013,28(6):889-897
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
冯健.
乡村重构：模式与创新,2012
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
康胜. 城乡一体化浙江的演进特征与路径模式.
农业经济问题,2010(6):29-35
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
李秀彬. 森林转型、农地边际化与生态恢复.
中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(10):93-98
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
林若琪. 转型期乡村多功能性及景观重塑.
人文地理,2012,27(2):45-49
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
刘彦随. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制.
地理学报,2011,66(10):1379-1389
|
被引
143
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
刘自强. 乡村地域主导功能的转型与乡村发展阶段的划分.
干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(4):49-54
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展.
地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138
|
被引
202
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构.
地理学报,2013,68(8):1019-1028
|
被引
280
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
龙花楼. 我国乡村转型发展动力机制与优化对策的典型分析.
经济地理,2011,31(12):2080-2085
|
被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
陆大道. 体现土地利用转型的重要理念.
中国国土资源报,2006
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
孟欢欢. 安徽省乡村发展类型及乡村性空间分异研究.
经济地理,2013,33(4):144-148,185
|
被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
祁新华. 乡村劳动力迁移的“双拉力”模型及其就地城镇化效应——基于中国东南沿海三个地区的实证研究.
地理科学,2012,32(1):25-30
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
乔家君. 河南省农田利用集约度时空变化及其影响环境.
地理研究,2012,31(9):1598-1610
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
肖锦成. 城乡统筹下的城市与乡村空间重构研究：以宿迁市为例.
中国土地科学,2013,27(2):54-60,97
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
修春亮. 东北地区城乡一体化进程评估.
地理科学,2004,24(3):320-325
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
张荣天. 基于县域尺度的江苏省乡村性空间格局演变及其机理研究.
人文地理,2013,28(2):91-97
|
被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问