帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

边界弹性与工作-家庭冲突、增益的关系:基于人?环境匹配的视角
Boundary Flexibility and Work-family Conflict and Enrichment: from Person-environment Fit Perspective

查看参考文献49篇

马红宇 1 *   申传刚 1 *   杨璟 2   唐汉瑛 1   谢菊兰 1  
文摘 本研究从人?环境匹配理论的视角探讨工作和家庭边界弹性能力和边界弹性意愿对个体工作?家庭冲突和工作?家庭增益的交互影响。通过问卷法共获得494份有效数据, 基于多项式回归分析和反应曲面分析的结果表明:工作弹性能力与工作弹性意愿的匹配对工作→家庭冲突有显著的负向效应, 对工作→家庭增益无显著影响; 家庭弹性能力与家庭弹性意愿的匹配对家庭→工作冲突、家庭→工作增益有显著的负向效应。
其他语种文摘 Work and family are two important domains in an individual's life. How to balance work and family domains have become an increasingly compelling and pressing issue for both the organizational scholars interested in theoretical advances, and for human resources practitioners seeking to promote the employee's daily life. Individuals negotiate the boundaries between work and family in their daily activities. There are differences between the individual's preference and the resource that provided by the organization in boundary management of work and family domain. In our study, using a person-environment (PE) fit theoretical base, we explored how the interaction between an individual's boundary flexibility willingness and the perceived flexibility ability of the domain boundary affects work-family conflict and work -family enrichment. Specifically, we predict that the fit of domain boundary flexibility-ability and individual's domain boundary flexibility-willingness would be associated with lower work-family conflict and higher work-family enrichment. Data were collected from a sample of 494 fulltime married employees from different industries. The questionnaire for employee included work-family boundary flexibility scale, work-family conflict and work-family enrichment. Among the major measures, the 16-items boundary flexibility scale was adopted from Matthews and Barnes-Farrell (2010), WFC was measured via 10 items that was adopted from Netemeyer and Boles (1996), the eight item WFE scale was adopted from Wayne, Musisca and Fleeson (2004). Results show that the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the above measures range from 0.72 to 0.89. Polynomial regression and response surface methodology were utilized to examine the proposed hypotheses. In line with the predictions, results of polynomial regression and response surface methodology demonstrate that work-to-family conflict decreased as work flexibility-ability (WFA) approached work flexibility-willingness (WFW), and increased as WFA exceeded WFW, family-to-work conflict decreased as family flexibility-ability (FFA) approached family flexibility-willingness (FFW), and increased as FFA surpassed FFW. The results also showed that the fit of WFA and WFW has no effect on work-to-family enrichment, and the fit of FFA and FFW has the significant effect on family-to-work enrichment, but it is opposite to the hypotheses. Specifically, family-to-work enrichment decreased as FFA approaching FFW, and increased as FFA exceeded FFW. The present study extends to our understanding the mechanism of the process of the work-family conflict and work-family enrichment happens. Finally, the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings, limitations and future research directions were also discussed.
来源 心理学报 ,2014,46(4):540-551 【核心库】
关键词 人?环境匹配 ; 边界弹性能力 ; 边界弹性意愿 ; 工作?家庭冲突 ; 工作家庭增益
地址

1. 华中师范大学心理学院, 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室;;湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉, 430079  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目 ;  国家自然科学基金重大研究项目 ;  华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金科研项目 ;  华中师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划资助项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:5116202

参考文献 共 49 共3页

1.  Allen T D. Dispositional variables and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2012,80:17-26 被引 4    
2.  Ashforth B E. All in a day's work: Boundaries and micor role transitions. Academy of Management Review,2000,25:472-491 被引 24    
3.  Aryee S. A cross-cultural test of a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Management,1999,25:491-511 被引 14    
4.  Byron K. A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2005,67:169-198 被引 16    
5.  Carlson D S. Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2006,68:131-164 被引 15    
6.  Chen H P. The relationship among core self-evaluations and employee's satisfaction, turnover intentions: The mediating role of work-family facilitation. Unpublished master's thesis,2008 被引 1    
7.  陈恒盼. 核心自我评价与员工满意感、离职意向的关系研究:工作家庭促进的中介作用.硕士学位论文,2008 被引 1    
8.  Chen Z. Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: A person-environment fit approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2009,74:82-93 被引 5    
9.  Clark S C. Work/Family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations,2000,53:747-770 被引 23    
10.  Desrochers S. Preliminary validation of the work-family integration-blurring scale. Journal of Family Issues,2005,26:442-466 被引 2    
11.  Eby L T. Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior,2005,66:124-197 被引 10    
12.  Edwards J R. Person-environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. The Academy of Management Annals,2008,2:167-230 被引 11    
13.  Edwards J R. Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78:628-648 被引 4    
14.  Edwards J R. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal,1993,36:1577-1613 被引 23    
15.  Edwards J R. Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1999,77:85-129 被引 6    
16.  Edwards J R. Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review,2000,25:178-198 被引 14    
17.  Ford M T. Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92:57-80 被引 7    
18.  Glavin P. Work-family role blurring and work-family conflict: The moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work and Occupations,2012,39:71-98 被引 2    
19.  Greenhaus J H. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review,1985,10:76-88 被引 62    
20.  Greenhaus J H. When work and family allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review,2006,31:72-91 被引 32    
引证文献 8

1 郭昫澄 集体主义-个体主义文化视角下工作-家庭关系差异分析 心理科学进展,2017,25(6):1036-1044
被引 0 次

2 李永占 特殊教育教师工作家庭冲突对工作投入的影响:情绪智力的调节作用 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(6):1106-1111
被引 4

显示所有8篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号