制造业生产率研究进展
Research progress in manufacturing industry productivity
查看参考文献107篇
|
文摘
|
中国正经历着由“制造业大国”向“制造业强国”的转型,制造业生产率的提升关系着中国在全球产业链分工中的地位。从地理学和经济学的视角,对制造业生产率的概念界定与发展、制造业生产率的来源及制造业生产率的增长路径等方面的相关理论进行回顾,在此基础上,指出不同阶段理论研究存在的缺陷和不足,以及下一阶段研究的改进方向;进而通过对国内外制造业生产率实证研究的梳理,发现中国制造业生产率研究已取得了卓有成效的进展。然而,国内研究缺乏本土化的制造业生产率研究的理论体系;研究方法缺乏突破;中国特有的经济体制、制造业成长的历史背景、地理分布和政策环境等特征在实证研究中尚未得到充分的挖掘和解析。未来中国制造业生产率的研究需要建立中国制造业生产率的理论研究体系,拓展研究方法,关注在当今全球产业链分工体系下以及国际国内产业转移的背景下制造业生产率来源和增长路径的演化特征及趋势,并加强对实践指导和政策参考方面的延伸。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Productivity has always been one of the key research areas in both economics and geography, which relates to the source and quality of economic growth. In the paradigm of productivity research, manufacturing, as the core sector in the economic system, has attracted growing interests of scholars. China is currently experiencing a profound transformation from a big manufacturing country to a powerful manufacturing country. Manufacturing industry productivity has a great impact on the position of China in the global value chain. Against this background, this paper has provided a comprehensive review on manufacturing industry productivity research. The research on manufacturing productivity will lead to improving the efficiency of resource use and optimizing industrial distribution. The paper summarized the theoretical developments of manufacturing industry productivity research in different stages from three aspects: definition and research area, source of the productivity growth, and productivity growth path. The concept of manufacturing productivity can be discussed in two ways: single factor productivity and total factor productivity. Single factor productivity relates one input to outputs. Whereas, total factor productivity expresses the ratio of all outputs produced to all resources used. Based on Cobb-Douglas production function, capital and labor are the main dominant inputs of a production process taking technological improvements as exogenous assumption. With the development of the productivity study, the exogenous technological improvements assumption was break. The endogenous growth theory and the agglomeration theory emphasized the role of information spillover and externality. We generalized the contributing empirical research on manufacturing industry productivity. It's evident that fixed asset investment, foreign trade and export, foreign direct investment, institutional and policy environment, industrial agglomeration all affected manufacturing productivity. However, no unanimous conclusions have been obtained on how these factors impacted manufacturing productivity. One of the heated discussions is the relationship between export and manufacturing productivity. Some researchers found that exporting boosted firm productivity by expanding market opportunities, while others hold that only the most productive firms could become exporting enterprises. Compared with the empirical research in the West, we found that the factors influencing manufacturing productivity in China were more complicated in the Chinese economic environment. In general, the manufacturing productivity research in China has made remarkable progress especially in the aspect of empirical research. However, it lacked localized theoretical system, and was short of attention to the unique historical, geographic and policy background of manufacturing industry in China. Therefore, the manufacturing industry productivity research in China could more focus on the following aspects in the future: (1) constructing localized theoretical framework that is suitable for manufacturing industry productivity research in China; (2) exploring the spatial and industrial heterogeneity of manufacturing industry productivity by introducing multiple spatial analysis methods; and (3) regional manufacturing structure shift and productivity evolution under the background of the global industrial chain division and the domestic and international industry shift. Research on Chinese manufacturing productivity is useful for enhancing the competitiveness of the manufacturing industry in China. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2014,33(3):399-410 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
制造业
;
生产率
;
增长路径
;
研究进展
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国城市发展研究院, 北京, 100088
2.
北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京, 100871
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5106157
|
参考文献 共
107
共6页
|
|
1.
柴志贤. 利用外资、环境约束与中国工业全要素生产率的增长: 基于Malmquist 指数与Malmquisit-Luenberger指数的比较研究.
技术经济,2013,32(1):64-70
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈继勇. 外商直接投资的知识溢出与中国区域经济增长.
经济研究,2008(12):39-49
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
陈良文. 产业集聚、市场结构与生产率——基于中国省份制造业面板数据的实证研究.
地理科学,2008,28(3):325-330
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
范剑勇. 产业集聚与地区间劳动生产率差异.
经济研究,2006(11):72-81
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
方健雯. FDI对我国全要素生产率的影响——基于制造业面板数据的实证分析.
管理评论,2009,21(8):74-79
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
冯猛. 什么影响了制造业行业内生产率结构变化: 基于1998-2007年中国工业企业数据的实证研究.
产业经济研究,2013(3):39-48
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
胡永泰. 中国企业改革究竟获得了多大成功.
经济研究,1994(6):20-32
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
简泽. 企业异质性、竞争与全要素生产率的收敛.
管理世界,2012(8):15-29
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
赖俊平. 市场竞争程度与中国工业生产率分布变化.
产业经济研究,2012(1):1-8
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
李春顶. 中国出口企业是否存在"生产率悖论": 基于中国制造业企业数据的检验.
世界经济,2010(7):64-81
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
李春顶. 我国出口企业的"生产率悖论"及其解释.
财贸经济,2009(11):84-112
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
李京文. 中国经济增长分析.
中国社会科学,1992(1):15-36
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
李小平. 中国工业行业的全要素生产率测算——基于分行业面板数据的研究.
管理世界,2005(4):56-64
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
李燕. 1998-2009年珠江三角洲制造业空间转移特征及其机制.
地理科学进展,2013,32(5):777-787
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
刘锐金. 中国农垦大中型工业企业的全要素生产率: 基于DEA的Malmquist 指数分析.
新疆农垦经济,2008(6):40-45
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
聂辉华. 中国制造业企业生产率与资源误置.
世界经济,2011(7):27-42
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
沈能. 中国制造业全要素生产率地区空间差异的实证研究.
中国软科学,2006(6):101-110
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
世界银行.
中国: 社会主义经济的发展,1982
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
世界银行.
中国: 长期发展的问题和方案,1985
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
史清琪. 衡量经济增长中技术进步作用的主要指标初探.
数量经济技术经济研究,1984(10):9-17
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问