1992-2012年国际生态足迹研究文献计量分析
Bibliometric analysis of ecological footprint research during 1992-2012
查看参考文献30篇
|
文摘
|
生态足迹是可持续发展领域进行定量研究的重要方法。由于较强的可操作性和全球可比性等优点,自1992年首次提出以来,得到相关研究机构和学者的广泛关注。以SCIE/SSCI 数据库为基础,对近20年来有关生态足迹的文献进行计量分析,阐释该领域的研究概况,揭示主要研究力量,呈现不同作者、机构和国家之间的合作情况,分析主要国家的研究差异并探讨该领域未来研究趋势和热点。研究发现:①加拿大生态经济学者Wackernagel是该领域重要的学者,不列颠哥伦比亚大学和悉尼大学是在该领域有突出贡献的研究机构,中国科学院和北京师范大学是在该领域有较大影响的中国研究机构;②美国是在该领域研究成果数量与质量均居首位的国家,中国虽然文献数量排第三位,但文献质量有待提高;③该领域文献总量不多,但增长迅速,且国际合作呈显著扩大趋势;研究尺度日趋多元化且不断深入微观领域;研究方法日趋丰富与完善,与投入产出分析法、产品生命周期及能值分析等方法相结合是近期主要研究趋势,但不同国家的研究重点亦有所差异;④ 气候变化、碳足迹、生态足迹区域转移等将有可能成为生态足迹领域未来的研究热点。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The term "Ecological Footprint" is used to quantify the pattern of sustainable development in many recent studies. Since this term was coined in 1992, it has gained a growing popularity among scholars and decision makers all over the world because of its operability and comparability across various places. Based on the SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and SSCI(Social Science Citation Index) databases, a bibliometric analysis is conducted on ecological footprint research during 1992-2012. The objective of this study is to identify the status and research direction of this theme. The collaboration relationship on this theme is detected among authors, research institutions, and countries. In addition, differences in research between China, USA and UK is identified. Future trend and hot topics are discussed as well. This study should serve as a useful guidance for beginners to grasp the big picture of this growing literature list while experienced researchers can gain a comprehensive and in-depth overview of this hot topic to better refine research directions and detect the gaps to fill. Bibliometrics is employed in this paper to analyze the publication pattern of ecological footprint research. As a research method used in library and information sciences, bibliometrics has been widely applied to analyze the pattern of literature and trend of a given topic or subject. It can be used for in-depth reviews of research themes for better guidance for follow-up studies. Based on 869 publications indexed in the SCIE/SSCI databases during 1992-2012, the bibliometrics depicts the progress of ecological footprint research through the revisit of many studies in this field. Build upon many review papers on ecological footprint, this bibliometrics-based paper presents a more comprehensive summary of the term definition, computational models, and case studies. The results reveal that the most productive and influential scholar in ecological footprint research is Wackernagel M, a Canadian ecological economist. University of British Columbia and University of Sydney are two major research institutions. Chinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Normal University are two most influential institutions in this research area in China. USA ranks as the top country in the publications of this topic both qualitatively and quantitatively. China's publications of ecological footprint research follow USA and UK, but the quality should be improved in the future. Despite a relatively smaller size of publications than many other themes, ecological footprint research has witnessed a growing trend by paper number and collaboration across countries. Research has been conducted at multiple scales over the years, with growing interest in analyzing finer-scale patterns and trend. The list of research methods has become richer and more diverse. The methods such as input-output analysis, life cycle assessment and energy analysis are among the most popular approaches in recent literatures, though different countries vary in research focus. Climate change, carbon footprint and the transfer of ecological footprint appear to be the emerging hot topics. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2014,33(3):336-346 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
生态足迹
;
SCIE/SSCI
;
文献计量
;
发展趋势
|
|
地址
|
1.
武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 武汉, 430079
2.
美国肯特州立大学地理系, 肯特, 44240
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;普通生物学 |
|
基金
|
国家基础科学人才培养基金科研能力训练项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5106151
|
参考文献 共
30
共2页
|
|
1.
曹淑艳. 基于投入产出分析的中国生态足迹模型.
生态学报,2007,27(4):1499-1507
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
曹淑艳. 表达生态承载力的生态足迹模型演变.
应用生态学报,2007,18(6):1365-1372
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
陈成忠. 生态足迹模型的争论与发展.
生态学报,2008,28(12):6252-6263
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
方恺. 自然资本核算的生态足迹三维模型研究进展.
地理科学进展,2012,31(12):1700-1707
|
被引
40
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
蒋依依. 国内外生态足迹模型应用的回顾与展望.
地理科学进展,2005,24(2):13-23
|
被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
李宏.
生态足迹理论及其应用研究,2006
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
龙爱华. 生态足迹评介及国际研究前沿.
地球科学进展,2004,19(6):971-981
|
被引
51
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
鲁凤.
生态足迹变化的动力机制及生态足迹模型改进研究,2011
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
王建源. 基于能值分析的山东省生态足迹.
生态学杂志,2007,26(9):1505-1510
|
被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
王明全. 基于能值的生态足迹方法在黑龙江和云南二省中的应用与分析.
自然资源学报,2009,24(1):73-81
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
王书华. 生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展.
自然资源学报,2002,17(6):776-782
|
被引
142
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
谢高地. 中国的生态空间占用研究.
资源科学,2001,23(6):20-23
|
被引
82
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
谢新源. 国内外生态足迹研究进展.
四川环境,2008,27(1):66-72
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
熊德国. 生态足迹理论在区域可持续发展评价中的应用及改进.
地理科学进展,2003,22(6):618-626
|
被引
67
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
徐中民. 生态足迹方法的理论解析.
中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(6):69-78
|
被引
97
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
徐中民. 中国1999年生态足迹计算与发展能力分析.
应用生态学报,2003,14(2):280-285
|
被引
256
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
杨开忠. 生态足迹分析理论与方法.
地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-636
|
被引
216
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
曾静静. 家庭碳排放计算方法分析评价.
地理科学进展,2012,31(10):1343-1352
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
张芳怡. 基于能值分析理论的生态足迹模型及应用--以江苏省为例.
自然资源学报,2006,21(4):653-660
|
被引
73
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Berg H. Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical lake Kariba, Zimbabwe.
Ecological Economics,1996,18(2):141-159
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问