帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

南京地铁对城市公共交通网络通达性的影响及地价增值响应
The impact of metro lines on public transit accessibility and land value capture in Nanjing

查看参考文献36篇

李志 1   周生路 2 *   吴绍华 2   代婉莹 3   陈龙 2   吕立刚 2  
文摘 以南京地铁1、2号线为例,通过多个指标测度地铁建成前后的交通通达性及其格局变化,探讨不同类型用地对地铁通达性的增值响应模式。研究结果表明:地铁从时间成本、影响范围等方面增益了研究区交通通达性;外围绝对通达性增幅高于中心区,而“半径陷阱”作用使得中心区的相对通达性高于外围,产生“中心膨胀-外围坍缩”的通达性格局变化;地价格局变化与通达性格局变化类似,不同类型用地对地铁的增值响应模式不同,商业用地增值为对数响应模式、住宅用地为指数响应模式、工业用地为线性响应模式;地铁对城市土地升值的贡献占到总量的1/3,其中地铁对商业用地外部性作用大于住宅和工业用地。研究结果可为评估地铁对城市土地利用影响、城市经济外部性以及制订征收差别化的土地房屋税收政策提供依据。
其他语种文摘 This paper takes Nanjing metro Line 1 and Line 2 as an example to construct the urban public transit network, which is used to measure the changes in transit accessibility with multiple indicators. Based on the distinctions between before and after building metro line, this paper provides diverse value added response modes with different land prices capture on the transit accessibility-added of metro, which offers a scientific basis for law inquiry and policy formulation. The results show that the metro enhances the urban public transit accessibility in time costs, sphere of influence, and network morphology and so on. Absolute accessibility increase in the peripheral region is larger than that in the central area, while relative accessibility increase in the center is larger because of "radius trap", which brings about "center expansion & peripheral collapse" pattern change. The change of land price pattern is similar with that of accessibility pattern. Thus, space differentiated external economy comes into being with the effects of metro. Different types of land use have different land value capture modes, for example, commercial land value increase shows a logarithmic response mode, residential land value increase shows an index response mode, while industrial land value increase shows a linear response mode. It is indicated that metro contributes 1/3 to urban land added value, in which the external effect on commercial land is higher than that of residential and industrial land, with a ratio of 2:1:0.3. The result may be beneficial to assess the Nanjing Metro influences on the overall urban land use, and provide the evidence for levying urban land and housing differentiated taxes to compensate the metro economic externality losses.
来源 地理学报 ,2014,69(2):255-267 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201402009
关键词 地铁 ; 通达性 ; 地价增值 ; 南京
地址

1. 江西师范大学城建学院, 南昌, 330022  

2. 南京大学地理与海洋科学学院, 南京, 210093  

3. 中国联合工程公司规划市政设计院, 杭州, 310014

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
学科 自然地理学
基金 国家自然科学基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:5061773

参考文献 共 36 共2页

1.  Richard D K. Transport impacts of greater Manchester's metro link light rail system. Journal of Transport Geography,1996,4(1):1-14 被引 3    
2.  Huang H. The land-use impacts of urban rail transit systems. Journal of Planning Literature,1996,11(1):17-30 被引 1    
3.  Harper R. Midland metro: Monitoring the impacts. Presented in the European Transport Research Conference,2000 被引 1    
4.  Golias J C. Analysis of traffic corridor impacts from the introduction of the new Athens metro system. Journal of Transport Geography,2002,10:91-97 被引 6    
5.  Bhandari K. Economic and equity evaluation of Delhi metro. International Journal of Urban Sciences,2009,13(2):187-203 被引 2    
6.  Bhattacharjee S. Impact of light rail on traffic congestion in Denver. Journal of Transport Geography,2012,22:262-270 被引 3    
7.  Brueckner J K. Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review,1999,43:91-107 被引 13    
8.  Castillo-Manzano J I. Urban retail fabric and the metro: A complex relationship. Lessons from middle-sized Spanish cities. Cities,2009,26(3):141-147 被引 4    
9.  Christopher R B. The impact of rapid rail transit on economic development: The case of Atlanta's MARTA. Journal of Urban Economics,1997,42(2):179-204 被引 6    
10.  Kwan M P. Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications. Geographical Systems,2003,5:129-138 被引 46    
11.  杨家文. 通达性: 概念, 度量及应用. 地理学与国土研究,1999,15(2):62-67 被引 12    
12.  Weinberger R. Light rail proximity: Benefit or detriment? The case of Santa Clara County, California,2001 被引 1    
13.  Vessail K V. Land use impacts of rapid transit. Berkeley Planning Journal,1996,11:71-105 被引 1    
14.  Sara I M. A meta-analysis of the impact of rail projects on land and property values. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice,2013,50:158-170 被引 7    
15.  Bollinger C R. Spatial variation in office rents within the Atlanta region. Urban Studies,1998,35(7):1097-1118 被引 1    
16.  Gerrit J K. Do plans matter? The effects of light rail plans on land values in station areas. Journal of Planning Education and Research,2001,21(1):32-39 被引 2    
17.  Aaron G. Spatial and temporal capitalization effects of light rail in phoenix from conception, planning, and construction to operation. Journal of Planning Education and Research,2012,32(4):415-429 被引 1    
18.  Cervero R. Assessing the impacts of urban rail transit on local real estate markets using quasi-experimental comparisons. Transactions Research Part A: Policy and Practice,1993,27(1):13-22 被引 7    
19.  Cervero R. Land value impacts of rail transit services in San Diego County,2002 被引 1    
20.  Hack J. The role of transit investment in urban regeneration and spatial development: A review of research and current practice. CIP Annual Conference (Canada),2002 被引 1    
引证文献 20

1 杨叠涵 南京城市空间重构对土地出让时空演化影响研究 地理科学进展,2015,34(2):246-256
被引 6

2 李海斌 氧化镁/地铁渣土复合陶粒的制备及除磷性能研究 应用化工,2015,44(9):1581-1585
被引 1

显示所有20篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号