流调中心抑郁量表中文简版的编制
A short Chinese version of center for epidemiologic studies depression scale
查看参考文献14篇
|
文摘
|
目的编制流调中心抑郁量表(Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)中文简版。方法以全国分层随机取样的30801个普通人群样本和415个精神疾患样本为基础,结合独立样本t检验结果与量表信效度指标编制简版,并提出抑郁症状检出的划界分。结果CES-D中文简版共9题,内部一致信度在0.85~0.88,重测信度为0.49(P<0.001),各条目与总分相关均大于0.5,与原量表相关系数0.94~0.96(P<0.001)。首诊抑郁患者的量表分高于服药抑郁患者和普通人群。简版量表验证了两维度的因素结构,即积极症状与消极症状。量表以10分和17分为抑郁倾向和抑郁高风险的划界分。结论流调中心抑郁量表9题中文简版的信效度良好,可以在各年龄群体中进行抑郁水平的施测。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To develop a short Chinese version of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D). Method A stratified random nationwide sample with 30801 normal people and a mentally ill sample with 415 patients were tested. Items in the short version were chosen according to both the result of independent t-test in current study and the result of reliance and validity. Cut-off scores were offered to check up depressions. Result The internal consistency reliability of the 9-item Chinese version CES-D ranged from 0.85 to 0.88.The test-retest reliability was 0.49(P<0.001). All item-total correlations were higher than 0.5.The correlation between sumscores of the original scale and sumscores of the Chinese short version ranged from 0.94 to 0.96 (P< 0.001) in all the samples.The sum scores of initial diagnosis depression sample were significantly higher than that of treated depression sample and common sample. A two-dimension structure was testified.The cut-off scores of the short version were 10 and 17.Conclusion The 9-item Chinese version of CES-D can be used in various samples with reliable and valid effect. |
|
来源
|
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
,2013,22(12):1133-1136 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
流调中心抑郁量表
;
中文简版信度
;
效度
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院大学, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
3.
首都医科大学附属安定医院, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1674-6554 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5031410
|
参考文献 共
14
共1页
|
|
1.
Radloff L S. The CES-D Scale : A self-report depression scale for research in the general population.
Appl Psychol Meas,1977,1:385-401
|
被引
210
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Radloff L S. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale in adolescents and young adults.
J Youth Adolesc,1991,20:149-166
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Kwakkenbos L. Cross-language measurement equivalence of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in systemic sclerosis : a comparison of Canadian and Dutch patients.
PloS One,2013,8:e53923
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Kohout F J. Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index.
J Aging Health,1993,5:179-193
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
章婕. 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立.
中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24:139-143
|
被引
147
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Andresen E M. Screening for depression in well older adults : Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D.
Am J Prev Med,1994,10:77-84
|
被引
72
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Santor D A. Shortening the CES-D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression.
Psychol Assess,1997,9:233-243
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Chokkanathan S. Factor structure of the CES-D scale among older adults in Chennai, India.
Aging Ment Health,2013,17:517-525
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Cole J C. Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form.
Psychol Assess,2004,16:360-372
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
刘平(译).
ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类:研究用标准,1995
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Covic T. A longitudinal evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) in a rheumatoid arthritis population using Rasch analysis.
Health Qual Life Outcomes,2007,5:41
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Wang M. Factor structure of the CES-D and measurement invariance across gender in Mainland Chinese adolescents.
J Clin Psychol,2013,69:966-979
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
张杰. 流调中心抑郁水平评定量表在农村人群测量的信效度评价.
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18:372-374
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
肖晶. 抑郁认知易感者认知策略与情绪调节特征.
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2013,22:243-245
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问