接纳与行动问卷第二版中文版测评大学生的信效度
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition (AAQ-Ⅱ) in college students
查看参考文献19篇
|
文摘
|
目的: 检验接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-Ⅱ)中文版测评大学生人群的信效度,为进行经验性回避及接纳与承诺疗法相关研究提供测量工具。方法: 选取北京、四川和河南某大学学生共1749名,用随机数字法选取一半(n=879)进行探索性因素分析,另一半(n=870)进行验证性因素分析;在总样本中,简单随机选取366人,用自评抑郁量表(SDS)和自评焦虑量表(SAS)检验效标效度,用正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)和沉思反应量表(RRS)检验聚合效度和递增效度;间隔1个月,对从总体中简单随机选取的238人重测,检验重测信度。结果: 探索性因素分析表明,AAQ-Ⅱ的经验性回避单因子累积方差为62.5%,载荷在0.72~0.84间;验证性因素分析显示单因子结构拟合较好(χ~2/df=4.56,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.97,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.02);AAQ-Ⅱ得分与SDS、SAS、MAAS、RRS得分均呈正相关(r=0.26~0.69,P<0.01)。控制正念觉知或沉思反应后,AAQ-Ⅱ对焦虑、抑郁的解释力仍显著(ΔR~2=0.07~0.13,P<0.001)。量表的Cronbach α系数为0.88,重测信度为0.80。结论: 接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-Ⅱ)中文版测评大学生人群有良好的心理测量学指标,可用于经验性回避及接纳与承诺疗法相关研究的测量。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objectives: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition (AAQ-Ⅱ) in college students and to offer a measurement in studies of experiential avoidance and the acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in China.Methods: Totally 1749 college students were selected from Beijing,Henan,and Sichuan Provinces,and were randomly allocated into two groups where one subset (n=879) was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA),and the other (n=870) for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).In addition,responses of 366 participants selected by simple random sampling were assessed in criterion validity,convergent and incremental validity.Criterion validity was tested with the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS).Convergent and incremental validity was tested with the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS).After 1 month,238 of the participants from the total sample were randomly sampled out to assess the test-retest reliability.Results: Results of EFA showed one factor solution which explained 62.5% of the total variance,and factor loadings ranged between 0.72 and 0.84.Results of CFA confirmed the hypothesized one-factor mode (χ~2/df=4.56,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.97,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.02).Furthermore,the AAQ-Ⅱ was significantly correlated with SAS,SDS,MAAS,as well as total and subscale scores of the RRS (r=0.26-0.69,P<0.01),suggesting sound criterion and convergent validities.The AAQ-II also showed incremental validity beyond mindfulness or rumination in explaining depression and anxiety (ΔR~2=0.07-0.13,P<0.001).The AAQ-Ⅱ additionally demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.88) and test-retest reliability (Cronbach's α=0.80). Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition (AAQ-Ⅱ) has acceptable psychometric properties in college students,and it could be applied in studies of experiential avoidance and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in China. |
|
来源
|
中国心理卫生杂志
,2013,27(11):873-877 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
接纳与承诺疗法
;
接纳与行动问卷第二版
;
经验性回避
;
心理灵活性
;
信度
;
递增效度
;
心理测量学
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6729 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4981524
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
|
1.
Fledderus M. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II.
Psychol Assess,2012,24(4):925-936
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
张婍. 接纳与承诺疗法的心理病理模型和治疗模式.
中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(5):377-381
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Hayes S C. Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders:a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.
J Consult Clin Psychol,1996,64(6):1152-1168
|
被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Ciarrochi J. Psychological flexibility as a mechanism of change in acceptance and commitment therapy.
Assessing Mindfulness and Acceptance Processes in Clients:illuminating the theory and practice of chang,2010:51-75
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Kocovski N L. Mindfulness and acceptance-based group therapy for social anxiety disorder:an open trial.
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice,2009,16(3):276-289
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Dalrymple K L. Acceptance and commitment therapy for generalized social anxiety disorder.
Behav Modif,2007,31(5):543-568
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Bond F W. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II:a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.
Behav Ther,2011,42(4):676-688
|
被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Hayes S C. Acceptance and commitment therapy:model,processes and outcomes.
Behav Res Ther,2006,44(1):1-25
|
被引
64
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
McCracken L M. General psychological acceptance and chronic pain:there is more to accept than the pain itself.
Eur J Pain,2010,14(2):170-175
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Monestes J L. Babel's AAQ-II:do different languages result in different outcomes in Europe?.
Welcome to the functional Babel:talking ACT in non English-speaking countries Symposium ACBS World Conference III,the University of Twente,1-3 July 2009,2009
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Brislin R W. Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research.
J Cross-Cultural Psychol,1970,1(3):185-216
|
被引
112
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
舒良. 自评抑郁量表和抑郁状态问卷（Self-Rating Depression Scale and Depression Status Inventory）.
中国心理卫生杂志,1999(增刊):194-196
|
被引
124
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
吴文源. 自评焦虑量表（Self-Rating Anxiety Scale，SAS）.
中国心理卫生杂志,1999(增刊):235-238
|
被引
115
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
陈思佚. 正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)的修订及信效度检验.
中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(2):148-151
|
被引
62
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
杨娟. 沉思反应量表中文版在高中生中初步运用结果分析.
中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(1):27-31
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Karekla M. Coping and experiential avoidance:unique or overlapping constructs?.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry,2011,42(2):163-170
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Nolen-Hoeksema S. Sex-differences in unipolar depression-evidence and theory.
Psychol Bull,1987,101(2):259-282
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Gloster A T. Assessing psychological flexibility:What does it add above and beyond existing constructs?.
Psychol Assess,2011,23(4):970-982
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
王淑娟. 关系框架理论:接纳与承诺治疗的理论基础(述评).
中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(11):877-880
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问