基于指数模型的郑州—洛阳地区史前聚落遗址空间分布
Spatial distribution of prehistoric settlement sites in Zhengzhou-Luoyang Region based on index model
查看参考文献23篇
|
文摘
|
为了探究郑州—洛阳地区史前人类聚落遗址空间分布规律,在GIS 支持下,主要使用高程分析、坡度坡向分析和缓冲区分析等空间数据分析方法,分别获取4个史前文化时期聚落遗址分布与高程、坡度、坡向、离水距离4种环境因子的关系。在此基础上构造适宜性指数评价系统,建立聚落遗址指数模型,将模型结果与遗址具体分布情况进行比较,阐述遗址分布的特征和原因,并据此解读史前人地关系演变。研究结果表明:① 史前人类遗址选址对上述4因子具有强烈的选择倾向:地势较低的地区更有利于人类生活、交通和农作物种植;坡度较小的平原地带受地表径流势能作用相对较小,有利于建造房屋和抵御自然灾害;阳坡(朝南)不仅可在一定程度上抵挡风寒,也适宜植被和作物生长,有利于人类获得更多的生产、生活资料;而河流湖泊则可为人类提供充足的水源。② 在4个史前文化时期中,裴李岗时期的人类生存能力较弱,对环境依赖性较强,为谋求生存,必须尽可能占据环境最优区域;在仰韶前期和仰韶后期,人类适应和改造自然的能力逐步提高,不仅能够选择条件较优的居住点,还开始扩展新的生存领域;龙山时期人类按自由意志活动的能力进一步增强,体现在遗址数量大幅增长,并开始出现社会分化现象,部分人群凭借某种特权得以优先占据条件最好的区域。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
To study the distribution mechanism of prehistoric human settlements in Zhengzhou-Luoyang region, the relationships between the settlements distribution and the four environmental factors including elevation, slope, aspect and distance from water are analyzed with the support of GIS. On that basis, in the form of a graph of the region showing different suitability levels, a suitability index evaluation system is constructed and the settlement index model is established. The results of the model are then compared to the specific circumstances of the site distribution to explain the characteristics of, and possible reasons for, the settlements distribution. This approach enables the research based on documents and archaeological survey to reach more rational conclusions, and has great value for the interpretation of man-land relationship. The results show that: (1) Prehistoric settlement site selection was strongly influenced by the four environmental factors mentioned above. Low plain area was more convenient for prehistoric human to live, commute and plant crops. Most sites lied in the almost flat areas for minimum impact caused by the potential energy of the surface runoff, and it also helped build houses and resist natural disasters. Living at places facing the south not only kept out the wind but also promoted vegetation, growing crops and other farm produce. Water resources were made possible by living near lakes and rivers. (2) In Peiligang Period, the survival skills of humans had yet to be developed. They were heavily dependent upon the surroundings. They had to occupy the most suitable areas as much as possible to live on the abundant natural resources. In the Early Yangshao Period, based on the fact that the number of people living in the most suitable places decreased, humans had become adapted to nature and started to explore it. Not only they found out ways to locate the best places for living, but also they began to expand their living environment, suggesting that humans had advanced in their ability to carry out the production activities on their own. In the Late Yangshao Period, the capability of human activities didn't expand, and the suitability played less of role in choosing settlement sites. In Longshan Period, the prehistoric culture boosted, productivity increased, and by contrast the number of humans living at most suitable settlement sites increased, which means social stratification appeared so that the higher class had the power to occupy the most suitable settlement sites. The ability for humans to live by their free will or even remodel the nature had been further improved. To sum up, the research on spatial distribution of the Neolithic settlement sites in Zhengzhou-Luoyang region on the basis of index model provides a new approach to the field of archaeology from managing and decision-making aspects. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2013,32(10):1454-1462 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
空间分析
;
指数模型
;
史前聚落遗址
;
郑州—洛阳
|
|
地址
|
1.
南京信息工程大学遥感学院, 南京, 210044
2.
南京信息工程大学计算机与软件学院, 南京, 210044
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4966328
|
参考文献 共
23
共2页
|
|
1.
毕硕本. 郑洛地区史前聚落遗址坡向坡度分析.
测绘科学,2010,35(6):139-141
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
邓辉. 8500 a BP以来长江中游平原地区古文化遗址分布的演变.
地理学报,2009,64(9):1113-1125
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
邸凯昌. 空间数据发掘和知识发现的框架.
武汉测绘科技大学学报,1997,22(4):328-332
|
被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
冯文兰. 基于GIS的岷江上游乡村聚落空间聚集特征分析——以茂县为例.
长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(1):57-61
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
封志明. 基于GIS的中国人居环境指数模型的建立与应用.
地理学报,2008,63(12):1327-1336
|
被引
80
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
郭晓东. 基于GIS的秦安县乡村聚落空间演变特征及其驱动机制研究.
经济地理,2012,32(7):56-62
|
被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
郭媛媛. 山东北部地区聚落遗址时空分布与环境演变的关系.
地理学报,2013,68(4):559-579
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
韩茂莉. 全新世以来西辽河流域聚落环境选择与人地关系.
地理研究,2008,27(5):1118-1128
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Hasenstab R J. GIS in Historical Predictive Modelling: The Fort Drum Project.
Interpreting space: GIS and Archaeology,1990
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
胡珂. 无定河流域全新世中期人类聚落选址的空间分析及地貌环境意义.
地理科学,2011,31(4):415-420
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
胡最. 传统聚落景观基因及其研究进展.
地理科学进展,2012,31(12):1620-1627
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Kvamme K L.
A manual for predictive site location models: Examples from the grand junction district, Colorado,1983
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
刘建国. 空间分析技术支持的聚落考古研究.
遥感信息,2006(3):51-53
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
倪金生. 山东沭河上游流域考古遗址预测模型.
地理科学进展,2009,28(4):489-493
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Otinger J L.
Settlement predictions in sSparta: A locational analysis and cultural resource assessment in the uplands of Calhoun County, Arkansas,1981
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
单勇兵. 基于GIS的徐州市乡村聚落空间适宜性分析.
地域研究与开发,2012,31(6):156-160
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
汤国安. 基于GIS的乡村聚落空间分布规律研究: 以陕北榆林地区为例.
经济地理,2000,20(5):1-4
|
被引
53
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
王兴菊. 基于GIS指数模型的山洪灾害防治区划方法研究.
水电能源科学,2011,29(9):54-57
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
闫丽洁. 借助GIS研究史前聚落遗址的空间分布特征.
地理信息世界,2012,10(2):44-48
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
杨林. 洛阳地区史前聚落遗址空间形态研究.
地理科学,2012,32(8):993-999
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问