北京城市居民服务设施可达性偏好与现实错位
Residents' incongruence between reality and preference of accessibility to urban facilities in Beijing
查看参考文献31篇
|
文摘
|
服务设施可达性对于居民生活质量的重要性越来越受到国内外研究和城市规划的广泛重视,然而中国城市发展过程中却暴露出服务设施可达性下降的问题。从居民的视角出发,构建影响中国城市居民服务设施可达性偏好与现实错位的分析框架。在此基础上,分析了基于北京市2005年居住环境调查主观数据对居民的服务设施可达性偏好。利用北京城市服务设施空间数据借助GIS评估居民的客观服务设施可达性,通过多元回归模型讨论居民服务设施可达性偏好与现实的错位情况和相关因素并侧重验证城市空间结构和住房获取渠道的影响,这些因素与中国的城市发展和住房政策变化紧密相关并将基于此提出促进居民实现其服务设施可达性偏好的城市规划和政策建议。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Accessibility to facilities is a significant concern to urban residents' life quality, and is an indicator frequently used for a place's livability. In the U.S., the rise of anti-sprawl smart growth and the environmental concerns about transportation show that the growing preference for accessibility is connected to interest in urban environment. However, in China, researches have reported the decreasing accessibility to facilities brought by rapid urbanization. Meanwhile, the increasing selectivity in preferences may further reduce accessibility. So far there has been little research on the general preference of different households for living environment; less is known about which households are experiencing a state of incongruence between their preference and reality. This paper is concerned with several aspects of accessibility to various daily life activities and destinations (education, health services, shopping, recreation space and food outlets). The paper has three aims. First, it is to analyze whether the preference for accessibility varies across socio-economic characteristics. Second, it is to measure the objective accessibility across different locations and housing types. Third, it is to identify the determinants of incongruence between people's preference and reality. Particularly, we are interested in the influence of urban temporal and spatial development, as well as housing access types. Our micro data comes from a large-scale 2005 residential satisfaction survey conducted in the city of Beijing. We also adopted GIS-based measures of objective accessibility and related it to a respondent's satisfaction levels. Evidence generated from this study will shed some light on the problem of social justice in urban space. Moreover, it can contribute to the debate on urban sprawl and housing reform. Finally, the paper sums up with suggestions to local government on public facilities provision. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2013,68(8):1071-1081 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
居民
;
服务设施可达性
;
偏好
;
错位
;
城市扩张
;
住房市场化
;
北京
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
美国俄勒冈大学规划与公共政策管理系, 尤金, 97403
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4936316
|
参考文献 共
31
共2页
|
|
1.
Marans R. Toward an understanding of community satisfaction.
Metropolitan America in Contemporary Perspective,1975:299-352
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
张文忠. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法.
地理科学,2007,27(1):17-23
|
被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Alonso W.
Location and Land Use,1964
|
被引
66
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Belden Russonello. The 2011 Community preference survey: What Americans are looking for when deciding where to live.
Commissioned by the National Association of Realtors,2011
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
柴彦威. 单位视角下的中国城市空间重构.
现代城市研究,2011(3):5-9
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Ding Wenjie. Value of access to jobs and amenities: Evidence for new residential properties in Beijing.
Tsinghua Science and Technology,2010,15(5):595-603
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Haugen K. Proximity, accessibility and choice: A matter of taste or condition?.
Papers in Regional Science,2012,91(1):65-84
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
蒋海兵. 基于时间可达性与伽萨法则的大卖场区位探讨：以上海市中心城区为例.
地理研究,2010,29(6):2-14
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
王松涛. 公共服务设施可达性及其对新建住房价格的影响——以北京中心城为例.
地理科学进展,2007,26(6):78-85
|
被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
邓羽. 北京城区交通时间可达性测度及其空间特征分析.
地理学报,2012,67(2):169-178
|
被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
张文忠. 西方城市居住区位决策与再选择模型的评述.
地理科学进展,2004,23(1):89-95
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Fieldman R M. Settlement-identity: Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society.
Environment and Behavior,1990,22:183-229
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Schwanen T. The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,2004,31:759-784
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Schwanen T. What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled.
Transportation Research Part D,2005,10:127-151
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
崔功豪. 中国城市边缘区空间结构特征及其发展：以南京等城市为例.
地理学报,1990,45(4):400-411
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
柴彦威. 以单位为基础的中国城市内部生活空间结构：兰州市的实证研究.
地理研究,1996,15(1):30-38
|
被引
69
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
揭艾花. 单位制与城市女性发展.
浙江社会科学,2001(1):94-99
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
郑思齐. 城市居民对居住区位的偏好及其区位选择的实证研究.
经济地理,2005,25(2):194-198
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Talen E. Traditional urbanism meets residential affluence: An analysis of the variability of suburban preference.
Journal of the American Planning Association,2001,67:199-216
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Naess P. Residential location affects travel behavior: But how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area.
Progress in Planning,2005,63(2):162-257
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问