帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

关于世界城市研究的两场争论及其对相关研究的影响
Two debates and two trends:Review on world city research

查看参考文献90篇

文摘 20世纪80年代以来,“世界城市”成为城市研究领域的热点话题。在迄今30年的研究过程中,2000年前后发生的针对世界城市经典理论的两场学术争论具有里程碑意义:① 关于世界城市发展动力和类型的争论;② 关于世界城市发展历史的争论。通过争论,凝聚了学界共识,引发了本研究领域逐步从论证经济全球化对城市重构的作用转向讨论城市全球化的多样路径。两场争论之后,“世界城市政治”和“世界城市历史”的讨论成为新世纪两个重要的研究方向。本文回顾了经典世界城市理论以及对其的早期批评,详细介绍了两场争论及其引发的两种研究方向,并在此基础上提出了对中国世界城市研究的启示。
其他语种文摘 This paper provides a review on the progress of world city research in the past 30 years. It attempts to argue that, in the 21st century, the focus of world city literature has shifted from proving the links between economic globalization and urban restructuring to revealing different pathways in world city formation. Two debates took place around 2000 have become turning points in the academic trajectory: (1) debate on world city types and driving forces led by Hill and Kim; (2) debate on world city history led by Abu-Lughod. This paper is organized into three sections. First, it briefly reviews the classical theories alongside with some early criticisms. In the 1980s,the world city theories founded by Friedmann and Sassen have caused a paradigm shift in urban studies. Cities have been seen as basing points of the new international division of labor. Although the classical theories are still the foundation of current research, scholars have criticized them for overemphasizing the economic factors, exaggerating the generality of New York model and neglecting historical analysis. Because of lacking solid empirical bases, these early criticisms have not challenged the classical theories radically. Secondly, it introduces the two debates and two following trends in detail. Based on the study of Tokyo and Seoul, Hill and Kim have led the first debate. As the important role of developmental state, they designated the two Asian cities as state-centred global cities,which were in sharp contrast to the market-certred ones, such as New York and London. Friedmann and Sassen have responds to their arguments and admitted that, the classical theories neglected the role of state. The second debate is about history of world cities. Through investigating the evolution of three American cities in a long-term, Abu-Lughod has explored their unique responses, called "personality", to globalization. Her historical-comparative method has opened up an important new theoretical perspective and aroused interest on historical analysis. As a result of the two debates, the discussions in this field have already been moved forward. Researches on "world city politics" and "world city history" have become two major trends in this new century. Finally, based on the reviews, it states some inspirations for world city research in China. With the rising of China,Chinese cities will play more important roles in the world. The research should not just follow the classical theories, but reveal the nature of Chinese modes, which will help to find the right way and enrich the world city theories.
来源 地理科学进展 ,2013,32(8):1177-1186 【核心库】
关键词 世界城市 ; 历史—比较方法 ; 世界城市政治 ; 动力 ; 类型
地址

中山大学城市与区域研究中心, 广州, 510275

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1007-6301
学科 自然地理学
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4923054

参考文献 共 90 共5页

1.  Abu-Lughod J. Comparing Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles: Testing some world cities hypotheses. World cities in a world system,1995:171-191 被引 2    
2.  Abu-Lughod J. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America'sglobal cities,1999 被引 1    
3.  Amin A. The ordinary city. Transactions ofthe Institute of British Geographers,1997,22(4):411-427 被引 4    
4.  Ancien D. Global city theory and the new urban politicstwenty years on: The case for a geohistorical materialistapproach to the (new) urban politics of global cities. UrbanStudies,2011,48(12):2473-2493 被引 1    
5.  Barr K. From Dhaka to Manchester: Factories, citiesand the world-economy, 1600-1900. Cities in the World-System,1991:81-96 被引 1    
6.  Bater J H. Moscow's changing fortunes under three regimes. World cities beyond the west,2004:191-212 被引 2    
7.  Beauregard R A. The unavoidable continuitiesof the city. Globalizing cities : Anew spatial order,2000:22-36 被引 1    
8.  Bordo M D. Globalization in hisrotical perspective: Ourera is not as unique as we might think, and current trendsare not irreversible. Business Economics,2002,37(1):21-29 被引 1    
9.  Bowen W M. What is "urbanstudies"? Context, internal structure, and content. Journalof Urban Affairs,2010,32(2):199-227 被引 1    
10.  Braudel F. Civilization and capitalism: 15th-18th century,1984 被引 1    
11.  Brenner N. World city theory, globalization and the comparative-historical method: Reflections on JanetAbu-Lughod's interpretation of contemporary urban restructuring. Urban Affairs Review,2001,37(1):123-147 被引 1    
12.  Chase-Dunn C. The system of world cities, AD 800-1975. Urbanization in the world-economy,1985:269-292 被引 1    
13.  Chase-Dunn C. Trade globalizationsince 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review,2000,65(1):77-95 被引 1    
14.  Chase-Dunn C. City systems and worldsystems: Four millennia of city growth and decline. Cross-Cultural Research,2002,36(4):379-398 被引 1    
15.  Chiu S. Testing the global city-social polarizationthesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s. Urban Studies,2004,41(10):1863-1888 被引 1    
16.  Cohen R B. The new international division of labor,multinational corporations and urban hierarchy. Urbanization and urban planning in capitalistsociety,1981:287-315 被引 1    
17.  Deinema M. Amsterdam's 20th-Century reemergence asa global publishing hub,2012 被引 1    
18.  Derudder B. Introduction: A relationalurban studies. International handbook of globalization and world cities,2012:1-4 被引 1    
19.  Frank A G. Reorient: Global economy in the Asian age,1998 被引 1    
20.  Friedmann J. World city formation: An agendafor research and action. International Journal of Urbanand Regional Research,1982,6(3):309-344 被引 60    
引证文献 5

1 薛德升 历史时期全球化作用下的城市空间转变——以1890s~1930s广州东山地区为例 地理科学,2014,34(6):687-695
被引 3

2 刘怀宽 城市特性与政府网站营销内容的关联性——基于中国28个世界城市的分析 地理科学进展,2019,38(2):259-270
被引 0 次

显示所有5篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号