中国荔波锥状喀斯特世界自然遗产价值全球对比分析
Global comparative analysis on the world natural heritage values of Libo cone karst in China
查看参考文献24篇
|
文摘
|
研究世界自然遗产地价值,对遗产地本身以及其他类似区域的可持续发展有重要意义。基于系统论思想,将"中国南方喀斯特"第一批三处遗产地中的荔波锥状喀斯特置于全球视角,选取相似的、具有代表性的区域,结合世界遗产第八条有关地质地貌特征与演化历史等方面的评价标准,进行全球对比分析,揭示其全球显著价值。研究表明:荔波锥状喀斯特具有更为独特的演化环境与更为复杂的地质演化过程;更有典型的锥状喀斯特单体形态与较为齐全的地貌组合类型,更有罕见的锥状喀斯特森林生态系统和生命记录。荔波锥状喀斯特是反映地球热带—亚热带锥状喀斯特演化历史主要阶段的典型范例,极具代表中国南方喀斯特的世界遗产价值。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The World Natural Heritage is non-renewable resource, which is unique and irreplaceable, with world-class value and significance on the world. South China Karst is a total name of world natural heritage projects, which are declared by Chinese government to World Heritage Committee by stages. The first nominated sites, Libo in Guizhou Province, Shilin in Ynnan Province and Wulong in Chongqing City, which represent cone karst, stone forest and gorge karst respectively, were listed in World Heritage List on the 31st World Heritage Convention held in New Zealand on June 27, 2007.To study the values of world natural heritage sites has great significance to the sustainable development of the sites and other similar areas. Based on the systemism theory and the world heritage evaluation criterion viii about characters of geology, geomorphology and earth history, the outstanding universal values of Libo Karst, one of the properties of the South China Karst, were revealed after a global comparative analysis with similar areas worldwide. It was found that Libo Karst developed under more special environment with more complex geological evolution process. It demonstrates more typical geomorphological characters of both single cone karst forms and complex formations. It also owns rare forest ecosystem on cone karst and records of lives. Therefore, Libo Karst is the outstanding example representing the major stage of typical cone karst evolution history in tropical and subtropical areas, and has excellent representative values of the South China Karst.To study the values of world natural heritage sites is very important to the second stage world natural heritage nominated sites of South China Karst, which are declaring now. Yuntai Mountain of Shibing County in Guizhou Province, which is well-known with typical and integrated dolomite karst, is nominated as one of the second stage nominated sites of South China Karst. To explore the unique and aesthetic value of Yuntai Mountain is so important to be listed in world heritage list, and also is necessary to conservation and sustainable utilization of the scenic spots. To measure and count the characteristics of Yuntai Mountain on topographic maps using morphometry method, and to find similar typical landforms and contrast to it, the prominent value of world natural heritage can be proved, which would be study in future. |
|
来源
|
地理研究
,2013,32(8):1517-1527 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
锥状喀斯特
;
世界自然遗产
;
全球对比分析
;
中国荔波
|
|
地址
|
1.
贵州民族大学人文科技学院, 贵阳, 550025
2.
贵州师范大学中国南方喀斯特研究院, 贵阳, 550001
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0585 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
施秉喀斯特申报世界自然遗产项目
;
中国南方喀斯特申报世界自然遗产项目
;
贵州省科技厅项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4912775
|
参考文献 共
24
共2页
|
|
1.
袁道先.
中国岩溶动力系统,2002:3-13
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
熊康宁. "中国南方喀斯特"的世界自然遗产价值对比分析.
中国工程科学,2008,10(4):17-27
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Yuan Daoxian.
Global Karst Correlation,1998
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Ford D C.
Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology,1989:1-11
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
高道德.
黔南岩溶研究,1986:32-108
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
龚克. 桂林喀斯特区与世界遗产"中国南方喀斯特"对比分析.
资源与产业,2010,12(5):146-152
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Kieman K. The coastal tower karst of Phang Nga Bay.
喀斯特与洞穴风景旅游资源研究,1994:9-21
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Williams P W. Morphometric analysis of polygonal karst in New Guinea.
Karst Geomorphology,1974,83(3):374-409
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Day M J. Conservation of karst in Belize.
Journal of Cave and Karst Studies,1996,58(2):139-144
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Urich P B. Tropical karst management and agricultural development: Example from Bohol, Philippines.
Geografiska Annaler,1989,71(2):95-108
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Sonata D R. Protect of karst in the Philippines.
ACTA Carsologica,2006,35(1):121-130
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
. United Nations Education Scientific Cultural Organization.
World Heritage List: The Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park,2003
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Lyew-Ayee P. The use of GIS-based digital morphometric techniques in the study of cockpit karst.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2007,32(2):165-179
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Lehmann L. Morphological studies in Java.
Karst Geomorphology,1936:320-328
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Day M J. Morphology and distribution of residual limestone hills (mogotes) in the karst of northern Puerto Rico.
Geological Society of American Bulletin,1978,89(3):426-432
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Doerr A H. Karst Landscapes of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Jamaica.
The Scientific Monthly,1957,85(4):178-187
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Kholer H C. The subtropical karst of Bonito, western Brazil.
Global Karst Correlation,1998:257-267
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Xiong Kangning. Morphometry and evolution of fenglin karst in Shuicheng area, western Guizhou, China.
Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie,1992,36(2):227-248
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
王铮. 贵州省旅游业区重构研究.
地理研究,2003,22(3):313-323
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Haryono E. Landform differentiation within the Gunung Kidul Kegelkarst, Java.
Indonesia.Journal of Cave and Karst Studies,2004,66(2):62-69
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问