滑坡泥石流风险评估框架体系
Discussion on framework of landslide and debris-flow risk assessments
查看参考文献18篇
|
文摘
|
滑坡泥石流灾害风险评估目前没有一个统一的概念体系和理论框架。从滑坡泥石流风险评估的基本概念出发,综合分析不确定性与灾害以及灾害与风险之间的关系,明确区分了“灾害体”、“灾害事件”和“灾害现象”三种含义,界定了灾害易发性、危险性和风险性的内涵。然后从这些明确的概念出发,提出了危险性和易损性的数学表达形式,由此构建了滑坡泥石流风险评估的理论框架,以期能够为今后的滑坡泥石流风险研究工作提供参考。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The lack of a unified concept system and theoretical framework is a key problem for the further development of landslide and debris-flow risk assessments. By investigating of the basic concepts of risk assessment and analyzing the relationships between uncertainty and hazard as well as hazard and risk, the connotation of susceptibility, hazard and risk are defined clearly. According to these definitions of the concepts, mathematical expressions of hazard and vulnerability are proposed, and the methods for different scales and categories of risk assessments are discussed. A quantitative and semi-quantitative theoretical framework is constructed with the concepts, definitions, and mathematical expressions, and can be served as a basis for the risk assessment of landslide and debris flow. |
|
来源
|
中国地质灾害与防治学报
,2013,24(2):26-30 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
滑坡
;
泥石流
;
风险评估
;
理论框架
;
体系
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室, 四川, 成都, 610041
2.
西南科技大学环境与资源学院, 四川, 绵阳, 621010
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1003-8035 |
|
学科
|
地质学 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
;
国家973计划
;
中国科学院“百人计划”项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4879923
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
|
1.
唐川. 泥石流堆积泛滥区危险度的评价与应用.
自然灾害学报,1993,4(2):79-84
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
韦方强. 四川省泥石流危险度区划.
水土保持学报,2000,14(1):59-63
|
被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Wei F. Method and its application of the momentum model for debris flow risk zoning.
Chinese Science Bulletin,2003,48(6):594-598
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
唐川. 城市泥石流易损性评价.
灾害学,2005,20(2):11-17
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
刘希林. 都(江堰)汶(川)公路泥石流危险性评价及活动趋势.
防灾减灾工程学报,2004,24(1):41-46
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Kienholz H. Aspects of integral risk management in practice-considerations with respect to mountain hazards in Switzerland.
O sterreichische Wasser-und Abfallwirtschaft,2004,56:43-50
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Fausto G. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models.
Geomorphology,2006,81(1):166-184
|
被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
John C D. Two models for evaluating landslide hazards.
Computers & Geosciences,2006,32(8):1120-1127
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
白利平. 基于GIS的北京地区泥石流危险度区划.
中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(2):12-15
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
乔建平. 滑坡本底因子贡献率与权重转换研究.
中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(3):13-16
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Wei Fangqiang. The model and method of debris flow risk zoning based on momentum analysis.
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences,2006,11(4):835-839
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Fuchs S. Vulnerability function for debris flow risk assessment.
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2007(7):495-506
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Akbas S O. Critical assessment of existing physical vulnerability estimation approaches for debris flows.
Proceedings of landslide processes: from geomorphologic mapping to dynamic modelling,2009:229-233
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Quan Luna B. The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves.
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2011,11:1-14
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Wilhelm C. Quantitative risk analysis for evaluation of avalanche protection projects.
Proceedings of the 25 Years of Snow Avalanche Research,1998:288-293
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Barbolini M. Risk assessment in avalanche-prone areas.
Annals of Glaciology,2004(38):115-122
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
UNDHA.
Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management,1991
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
UNDHA.
Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management,1992
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问