帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

河南水旱灾害危险性时空特征研究
Research on Time and Spatial Characteristics of Flood and Drought Disasters Risk in Henan

查看参考文献30篇

文摘 河南省地处南北气候过渡带,水旱灾害频发。综合利用灾害数据资料及信息扩散模型,从致灾和承灾两个层面对河南省水旱灾害进行风险评估与时空特征研究,为加强水旱灾害的风险评估和管理提供理论依据。结果表明:①1988—2007年间发生水灾的年份主要是2003、2000、1998、1996、2005,旱灾年份是1997、2001、1999、1992、1988;②当降水距平百分率为20%、30%、40%时,发生水灾的概率分别为0.10、0.06、0.04,当降水距平百分率为-20%、-30%、-40%时,发生旱灾的概率分别为0.13、0.07、0.03;③水灾在5%、10%和15%受灾率时的风险概率分别为0.81、0.54、0.35,即1~3 a一遇之间,当受灾率大于20%时,风险概率为0.22,大约4.5 a一遇;而旱灾在5%、10%、15%、20%、25%受灾率时的风险概率分别为0.87、0.72、0.58、0.47和0.38,即1.2 a、1.4 a、1.7 a、2.1 a和2.6 a一遇;④旱灾发生频率大于水灾,空间上具有较大的区域差异,水旱灾害高风险区主要是驻马店、南阳、平顶山一带,旱灾大于水灾的区域主要是三门峡、洛阳、郑州、焦作、安阳、许昌,水灾大于旱灾的区域主要是信阳、漯河、开封、商丘、周口、濮阳,水旱灾害均较小的是济源和鹤壁。
其他语种文摘 Henan Province is located in the north-south climatic transitional zone with frequent flood and drought disasters. The risk probability of flood and drought disasters in Henan Province were researched with comprehensive utilization of disaster data and information diffusion model from two aspects of disaster-produced and disaster-consequence, so as to provide a theoretical basis for strengthening flood and drought risk assessment and management. The results showed that: 1) during the period of 1988 - 2007, the flood years are mainly 2003, 2000, 1998, 1996 and 2005, and the drought years are 1997, 2001, 1999, 1992 and 1988.2) When the rainfall anomaly percentage were at 20%, 30% and 40%, the floods probabilities were 0.10, 0.06 and 0.04; when the rainfall anomaly percentage were at - 20%, - 30% and - 40%, the droughts probabilities were 0.13, 0.07 and 0.03. 3) When the disaster occurrence rates of floods were 5%, 10%, 15%, the risk probabilities were 0.81, 0.54, 0.35 respectively, that was 1 - 3 a encounter, and when disaster rate was greater than 20%, approximately 4. 5 a encounter; while the disaster rates of droughts were at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, the risk probabilities were respectively 0.87, 0.72, 0.58, 0.47, 0.38, and that were 1. 2 a, 1. 4 a, 1. 7 a, 2.1 a, 2.6 a encounter. 4) The droughts occurred more frequently than the floods in Henan Province. There was a larger regional difference in space, both flood and drought high risk zones were mainly in Zhumadian, Nanyang, Pingdingshan, the regions with higher drought risk than floods were mainly in Sanmenxia, Luoyang, Zhengzhou, Jiaozuo, Anyang, Xuchang, and the regions with higher flood risk than drought were mainly in Xinyang, Luohe, Kaifeng, Shangqiu, Zhoukou, Puyang, in addition, the regions with both small flood and drought disasters risk were in Jiyuan and Hebi.
来源 自然资源学报 ,2013,28(6):957-968 【核心库】
关键词 风险评估 ; 水灾 ; 旱灾 ; 信息扩散模型 ; 河南省
地址

商丘师范学院环境与规划系, 河南, 商丘, 476000

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-3037
学科 植物保护
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 ;  河南省科技攻关项目 ;  河南省教育厅科技研究重点项目 ;  商丘师范学院青年科研基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:4872011

参考文献 共 30 共2页

1.  Li Y P. Climate change and drought: A risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Climate Research,2009,39(1):31-46 被引 21    
2.  Piao S. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature,2010,467(7311):43-51 被引 429    
3.  Potop V. Drought episodes in the Czech Republic and their potential effects in agriculture. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2010,99(3/4):373-388 被引 2    
4.  Wegren S K. Food security and Russia's 2010 drought. Eurasian Geography and Economics,2011,52(1):140-156 被引 6    
5.  Yan Denghua. General framework and key issues concerning integrated strategies for coping with drought and flood in China in a changing environment. Natural Hazards,2012,64(1):577-592 被引 3    
6.  Blakic C P. At Risk: Natural Hazard, People's Vulnerability and Disaster,1994 被引 1    
7.  Kates R W. Sustainability science. Science,2001,292:641-642 被引 187    
8.  Greg Niehavs. The allocation of catastrophe rish. Journal of Banking and Finance,2002,26(2/3):585-596 被引 2    
9.  史培军. 三论灾害研究的理论与实践. 自然灾害学报,2002,11(3):2-10 被引 4    
10.  刘新立. 区域水灾风险评估的理论与实践,2004 被引 1    
11.  赵士鹏. 基于GIS的山洪灾情评估方法研究. 地理学报,1996,51(5):471-479 被引 26    
12.  刘引鸽. 基于信息扩散理论的气象灾害风险评价方法. 气象科学,2005,25(1):84-89 被引 29    
13.  张顺谦. 基于信息扩散和模糊评价方法的四川盆地气候干旱综合评价. 自然资源学报,2008,23(7):713-723 被引 24    
14.  陈家金. 基于信息扩散理论的东南沿海三省农业干旱风险评估. 干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):248-252 被引 16    
15.  张继国. 基于信息扩散原理的区域洪水灾害风险评价模型. 水资源与水工程学报,2010,21(5):37-39 被引 3    
16.  王静爱. 中国水旱灾害危险性的时空格局研究. 自然灾害学报,2008,17(1):115-121 被引 20    
17.  刘亚彬. 基于信息扩散理论的中国粮食主产区水旱灾害风险评估. 农业工程学报,2010,26(8):1-7 被引 33    
18.  张丽娟. 基于信息扩散理论的气象灾害风险评估方法. 地理科学,2009,29(2):250-254 被引 40    
19.  王记芳. 近28a河南主要农业气象灾害及其影响. 气象与环境科学,2007,30(1):9-11 被引 4    
20.  刘佩. 河南省水旱灾害时空分布特征及与粮食产量关系. 中国农学通报,2011,27(29):290-295 被引 2    
引证文献 10

1 金菊良 旱灾风险评估的初步理论框架 灾害学,2014,29(3):1-10
被引 43

2 李治国 近36年河南农作物干旱灾情时空规律研究 干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(4):119-124
被引 3

显示所有10篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号