国际视觉景观研究评述
A review on visual landscape study in foreign countries
查看参考文献63篇
|
文摘
|
视觉景观研究在旅游景区建设、城乡规划与管理等领域具有广泛的应用前景。本文对近10年国外相关研究进行回顾,将其分为视觉景观质量评价、视觉影响评价、视觉景观偏好3个方面,阐述三者的基本含义、理论来源,重点介绍每个领域的研究主题、方法与技术,同时分析其中存在的优缺点及借鉴意义。在景观质量评价方面,研究重点仍在景观元素及特征对景观质量的影响,心理物理学方法居主导地位,呈现专家方法与之结合的趋势。在视觉影响评价方面,城乡建筑及能源设施产生的视觉影响为近期学者关注的焦点,GIS和3D可视化技术拓展了质量评价和影响评价的时空尺度,提高了精确性。在视觉景观偏好方面,学者从欣赏的主客体即人与景观两个角度进行了研究,深入挖掘人的自然、文化属性及景观特征对景观偏好的影响,并证实对景观的偏爱能够促进景观保护与土地合理利用。最后对近期国外研究状况进行总结,提出了未来研究的方向及对国内研究的有益启示。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Visual landscape study has a wide application prospect in the construction of scenic spots as well as urban and rural planning and management. Related foreign researches in the last decade were reviewed and divided into three parts in this paper: visual landscape quality assessment, visual impact assessment, and visual landscape preference. The basic implications and theoretical sources were introduced. This paper mainly concerns the topics, methods and techniques of each field. At the same time, advantages, disadvantages as well as relevant significance were analyzed. First, in landscape quality assessment, the research emphasis was the contribution of landscape elements and features to landscape quality. Psychophysical approaches were commonly used in this area, but there was an apparent tendency toward combination of the expert-based approach and the psychophysical approach. Secondly, visual impact caused by urban and rural buildings and renewable-energy facilities received much attention. GIS and 3D visualization techniques enlarged temporal-spatial scales and improved the precision of quality and impact assessment. Thirdly, scholars investigated visual landscape preference from two perspectives: human and landscape which was respectively subjective and objective part of appreciation. Not only human natural and cultural attributes but also landscape features were deeply explored to demonstrate the influence in landscape preference. It was confirmed that landscape preference could promote landscape preservation and rational land use. In conclusion, the progresses of the studies on visual landscape were summarized as follows: visual landscape study was more instructive in landscape planning and construction, because the subjective and objective methods were gradually integrated and the techniques were diversified; study areas were unbalanced and study objects were a little dull, so more relevant researches should be made in the developing countries and scholars should pay much attention to visual impact of a large variety of landscape types; there was a need for comprehensive perspectives as the number of interdisciplinary studies was increasing; the foreign researches had some enlightenment for the domestic ones. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2013,32(6):975-983 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
视觉景观
;
景观质量
;
视觉影响
;
景观偏好
;
综述
;
规划管理
|
|
地址
|
首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院, 北京, 100048
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
建筑科学 |
|
基金
|
北京市教育委员会科技计划面上项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4861445
|
参考文献 共
63
共4页
|
|
1.
Arriaza M. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2004,69(1):115-125
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Ayad Y M. Remote sensing and GIS in modeling visual landscape change: A case study of the northwestern arid coast of Egypt.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,73(4):307-325
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Beza B B. The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2010,97(4):306-317
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Canas I. A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public.
Land Use Policy,2009,26(4):1173-1181
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Carvalho-Ribeiro S M. Is an attractive forest also considered well managed? Public preferences for forest cover and stand structure across a rural/urban gradient in northern Portugal.
Forest Policy and Economics,2011,13(1):46-54
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Clay G R. Scenic landscape assessment: The effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,49(1/2):1-13
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Daniel T C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,54(1/4):267-281
|
被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
De Groot W T. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in The Netherlands.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,63(3):127-138
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
De Vries S. Eyesores in sight: Quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2012,105(1/2):118-127
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Dramstad W E. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,78(4):465-474
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Franco D. The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: The role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,62(3):119-138
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Fry G. The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators.
Ecological Indicators,2009,9(5):933-947
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Gallent N. Representing England's rural-urban fringe.
Landscape Research,2007,32(1):1-21
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Garre S. The dual role of roads in the landscape: A case study in the area around Mechelen (Belgium).
Landscape and Urban Planning,2009,92(2):125-135
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Hernandez J. Integration methodologies for visual impact assessment of rural buildings by geographic information systems.
Biosystems Engineering,2004,88(2):255-263
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Hernandez J. Assessment of the visual impact made on the landscape by new buildings: A methodology for site selection.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2004,68(1):15-28
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Junge X. Aesthetic preferences of non-farmers and farmers for different land-use types and proportions of ecological compensation areas in the Swiss lowlands.
Biological Conservation,2011,144(5):1430-1440
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Kaplan A. Assessing the visual quality of rural and urban-fringed landscapes surrounding livestock farms.
Biosystems Engineering,2006,95(3):437-448
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kim N H. The aesthetic evaluation of coastal landscape.
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2009,13(2):65-74
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Lange E. Scenario-visualization for the assessment of perceived green space qualities at the urban-rural fringe.
Journal of Environmental Management,2008,89(3):245-256
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问